As real as possible: Chancen und Herausforderungen von Online-Psychotherapie

Im Zuge der fortschreitenden Digitalisierung und moderner Technologien gewinnen videobasierte Psychotherapien immer mehr an Bedeutung. Sie haben einige Vorteile, bergen aber auch Herausforderungen. Gerade innerhalb der psychoanalytischen Gemeinschaft werden sie kritisch diskutiert. Dieser Beitrag zeigt anhand von zwei empirischen Studien, wie ähnlich videobasierte Settings dem Realkontakt kommen können.

• Literatur

• 1 Wind TR, Rijkeboer M, Andersson G. et al. The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interv 2020; 20: 100317
• 2 Zwerenz R, Becker J, Johansson R. et al. Transdiagnostic, psychodynamic web-based self-help intervention following inpatient psychotherapy: results of a feasibility study and randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health 2017; 4: 1-13
• 3 Andersson G, Cuijpers P. Internet-based and other computerized psychological treatments for adult depression: a meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther 2009; 38: 196-205
• 4 Scharff JS. Clinical issues in analyses over the telephone and the internet. Int J Psychoanal 2012; 93: 81-95
• 5 Juhos C, Meszaros J. Psychoanalytic psychotherapy and its supervision via videoconference: experience, questions and dilemmas. Am J Psychoanal 2019; 79: 555-576
• 6 Merchant J. The use of Skype in analysis and training: a research and literature review. Journal of Analytical Psychology 2016; 61: 309-328
• 7 Norcross JC, Pfund RA, Cook DM. The Predicted Future of Psychotherapy: A Decennial e-Delphi Poll. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2022; 53: 109-115
• 8 Johansson R, Andersson G. Internet-based psychological treatments for depression. Expert Rev Neurother 2012; 12: 861-9 quiz 870
• 9 Lindqvist K, Mechler J, Carlbring P. et al. Affect-Focused Psychodynamic Internet-Based Therapy for Adolescent Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e18047
• 10 Abd-Alrazaq AA, Rababeh A, Alajlani M. et al. Effectiveness and safety of using chatbots to improve mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e16021
• 11 Fernandez E, Woldgabreal Y, Day A. et al. Live psychotherapy by video versus in-person: A meta-analysis of efficacy and its relationship to types and targets of treatment. Clin Psychol Psychother 2021; 28: 1535-1549
• 12 Lopez A, Schwenk S, Schneck CD. et al. Technology-Based Mental Health Treatment and the Impact on the Therapeutic Alliance. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019; 21: 76
• 13 Andreas S, Gablonski T-C, Tschacher W. et al. Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in a face-to-face versus videoconferencing setting: A single case study. J. Clin. Psychol 2023; 79: 277-295
• 14 WHO. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1992
• 15 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Pub Incorporated; 2013
• 16 Gablonski TC, Herrmann PL, Lüdemann J. et al. Intersession experiences and internalized representations of psychotherapy: A scoping review. J Clin Psychol 2023; 79: 1875-1901
• 17 Koole SL, Tschacher W. Synchrony in Psychotherapy: A Review and an Integrative Framework for the Therapeutic Alliance. Front Psychol 2016; 7: 862
• 18 Lux M, Rabung S, Herrmann P. et al. Looking Beyond the Screen. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference. ACM Digital Library. Association for Computing Machinery; 2024: 499-502
• 19 Berthiaume M, Bouchard S, Brisebois C. et al. The validation of a telepresence scale for psychotherapy delivered in videoconference. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 2018; 16: 131-136
• 20 Kelley FA, Gelso CJ, Fuertes JN. et al. The real relationship inventory: development and psychometric investigation of the client form. Psychotherapy 2010; 47: 540-553