Curriculum for diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

Main Recommendations

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recognized the need to formalize and enhance training in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This manuscript represents the outcome of a formal Delphi process resulting in an official Position Statement of the ESGE and provides a framework to develop and maintain skills in diagnostic EUS. This curriculum is set out in terms of the prerequisites prior to training; the recommended steps of training to a defined syllabus; the quality of training; and how competence should be defined and evidenced before independent practice.

1 Trainees should have achieved competence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before training in diagnostic EUS.

2 The development of diagnostic EUS skills by methods that do not involve patients is advisable, but not mandatory, prior to commencing formal training in diagnostic EUS.

3 A trainee’s principal trainer should be performing adequate volumes of diagnostic EUSs to demonstrate maintenance of their own competence.

4 Training centers for diagnostic EUS should offer expertise, as well as a high volume of procedures per year, to ensure an optimal level of quality for training. Under these conditions, training centers should be able to provide trainees with a sufficient wealth of experience in diagnostic EUS for at least 12 months.

5 Trainees should engage in formal training and supplement this with a range of learning resources for diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy (FNA/FNB).

6 EUS training should follow a structured syllabus to guide the learning program.

7 A minimum procedure volume should be offered to trainees during diagnostic EUS training to ensure that they have the opportunity to achieve competence in the technique. To evaluate competence in diagnostic EUS, trainees should have completed a minimum of 250 supervised EUS procedures: 80 for luminal tumors, 20 for subepithelial lesions, and 150 for pancreaticobiliary lesions. At least 75 EUS-FNA/FNBs should be performed, including mostly pancreaticobiliary lesions.

8 Competence assessment in diagnostic EUS should take into consideration not only technical skills, but also cognitive and integrative skills. A reliable valid assessment tool should be used regularly during diagnostic EUS training to track the acquisition of competence and to support trainee feedback.

9 A period of supervised practice should follow the start of independent activity. Supervision can be delivered either on site if other colleagues are already practicing EUS or by maintaining contacts with the training center and/or other EUS experts.

10 Key performance measures including the annual number of procedures, frequency of obtaining a diagnostic sample during EUS-FNA/FNB, and adverse events should be recorded within an electronic documentation system and evaluated.

• References

• 1 Johnson G, Webster G, Boskoski I. et al. Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1071-1087
• 2 Rutter MD, Senore C, Bisschops R. et al. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: developing performance measures. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 81-89
• 3 Pimentel-Nunes P, Pioche M, Albeniz E. et al. Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 980-992
• 4 Sidhu R, Chetcuti Zammit S. et al. Curriculum for small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 669-686
• 5 Dekker E, Houwen B, Puig I. et al. Curriculum for optical diagnosis training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 899-923
• 6 Boskoski I, Pontecorvi V, Ibrahim M. et al. Curriculum for bariatric endoscopy and endoscopic treatment of the complications of bariatric surgery: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 276-293
• 7 Tate DJ, Argenziano ME, Anderson J. et al. Curriculum for training in endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 645-679
• 8 Dumonceau JM, Hassan C, Riphaus A. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline Development Policy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 626-629
• 9 Bisschops R, Dekker E, East JE. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) curricula development for postgraduate training in advanced endoscopic procedures: rationale and methodology. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 976-979
• 10 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE. et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 924-926
• 11 Cho CM. Training in endoscopy: endoscopic ultrasound. Clin Endosc 2017; 50: 340-344
• 12 Wani S, Keswani RN, Petersen B. et al. Training in EUS and ERCP: standardizing methods to assess competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1371-1382
• 13 Wani S, Keswani RN, Han S. et al. Competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, from training through independent practice. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 1483-1494e7
• 14 Early D, Badillo R. Training methods and assessment in endoscopic ultrasound. Techn Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 19: 110-116
• 15 Bekkali NL, Johnson GJ. Training in ERCP and EUS in the UK anno 2017. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017; 8: 124-128
• 16 Sewell JL, Bowen JL, Cate OT. et al. Learning challenges, teaching strategies, and cognitive load: insights from the experience of seasoned endoscopy teachers. Acad Med 2020; 95: 794-802
• 17 Sewell JL, Boscardin CK, Young JQ. et al. Learner, patient, and supervisor features are associated with different types of cognitive load during procedural skills training: implications for teaching and instructional design. Acad Med 2017; 92: 1622-1631
• 18 Sewell JL, Young JQ, Boscardin CK. et al. Trainee perception of cognitive load during observed faculty staff teaching of procedural skills. Med Educ 2019; 53: 925-940
• 19 Pourmand K, Sewell JL, Shah BJ. What makes a good endoscopic teacher: a qualitative analysis. J Surg Educ 2018; 75: 1195-1199
• 20 Zanchetti DJ, Schueler SA, Jacobson BC. et al. Effective teaching of endoscopy: a qualitative study of the perceptions of gastroenterology fellows and attending gastroenterologists. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2016; 4: 125-130
• 21 Bhutani MS, Aveyard M, Stills HF. et al. Improved model for teaching interventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 400-403
• 22 Wasan SM, Kapadia AS, Adler DG. EUS training and practice patterns among gastroenterologists completing training since 1993. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 914-920
• 23 Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO. et al. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 811-814
• 24 van Dam J, Brady PG, Freeman M. et al. Guidelines for training in electronic ultrasound: guidelines for clinical application. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 829-833
• 25 Koo CS, Anastassiades CP, Ho KY. Changing perspectives in the training of endoscopic ultrasonography in Asia. JGH Open 2021; 5: 1114-1118
• 26 Rosch T. State of the art lecture: endoscopic ultrasonography: training and competence. Endoscopy 2006; 38 (Suppl. 01) S69-S72
• 27 Polkowski M, Larghi A, Weynand B. et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 190-206
• 28 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA. et al. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 2016; 65: 607-615
• 29 de Campos ST, Arvanitakis M, Devière J. A portrait of Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and EUS training programs in Europe: current practices and opportunities for improvement. United European Gastroenterol J 2023; 11: 350-360
• 30 Hou X, Liang J, Konge L. et al. Training and certification of EUS operators in China. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11: 133-140
• 31 Harewood GC, Yusuf TE, Clain JE. et al. Assessment of the impact of an educational course on knowledge of appropriate EUS indications. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 554-559
• 32 Dhir V, Udawat P, Shah R. et al. Feasibility of an EUS e-training course with live cases. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1291-E1296
• 33 Kim GH, Bang SJ, Hwang JH. Learning models for endoscopic ultrasonography in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 5176-5182
• 34 Kefalides PT, Gress F. Simulator training for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 543-552 , viii
• 35 Goodman AJ, Melson J. et al. ASGE technology committee. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 1-12
• 36 Desilets DJ, Banerjee S, Barth BA. et al. Endoscopic simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 861-867
• 37 Matsuda K, Hawes RH, Sahai AV. et al. The role of simulators, models, phantoms. Whereʼs the evidence?. Endoscopy 2006; 38 (Suppl. 01) S61-S64
• 38 Li J, Yao J, Li S. et al. Validation of a novel swine model for training in EUS-FNA (with videos). Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 232-237
• 39 Sorbi D, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ. A simple phantom for learning EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 580-583
• 40 Bhutani MS, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH. A swine model for teaching endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging and intervention under EUS guidance. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 605-609
• 41 Barthet M, Gasmi M, Boustiere C. et al. EUS training in a live pig model: does it improve echo endoscope hands-on and trainee competence?. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 535-539
• 42 Fritscher-Ravens A, Cuming T, Dhar S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration training: evaluation of a new porcine lymphadenopathy model for in vivo hands-on teaching and training, and review of the literature. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 114-120
• 43 Ligresti D, Kuo YT, Baraldo S. et al. EUS anatomy of the pancreatobiliary system in a swine model: The WISE experience. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 249-254
• 44 Gonzalez JM, Cohen J, Gromski MA. et al. Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1286-E1291
• 45 Hoshi K, Irisawa A, Shibukawa G. et al. Validation of a realistic, simple, and inexpensive EUS-FNA training model using isolated porcine stomach. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E1004-E1008
• 46 Bar-Meir S. A new endoscopic simulator. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 898-900
• 47 Gao J, Fang J, Jin Z. et al. Use of simulator for EUS training in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 25-30
• 48 Burmester E, Leineweber T, Hacker S. et al. EUS Meets Voxel-Man: three-dimensional anatomic animation of linear-array endoscopic ultrasound images. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 726-730
• 49 Zhang J, Zhu L, Yao L. et al. Deep learning-based pancreas segmentation and station recognition system in EUS: development and validation of a useful training tool (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 874-885e3
• 50 Bhutani MS, Wong RF, Hoffman BJ. Training facilities in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an animal model as an aid to learning endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 932-934
• 51 Matsuda K, Tajiri H, Hawes RH. How shall we experience EUS and EUS-FNA before the first procedure? the development of learning tools.. Dig Endosc 2004; 16 (Suppl. 02) S236-S239
• 52 Xu W, Liu Y, Pan P. et al. Prior radial-scanning endoscopic ultrasonography training did not contribute to subsequent linear-array endoscopic ultrasonography study performance in the stomach of a porcine model. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 353-357
• 53 Kaneko M, Katanuma A, Maguchi H. et al. Prospective, randomized, comparative study of delineation capability of radial scanning and curved linear array endoscopic ultrasound for the pancreaticobiliary region. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E160-E170
• 54 Matthes K, Bounds BC, Collier K. et al. EUS staging of upper GI malignancies: results of a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 496-502
• 55 Bhatia V, Tajika M, Hijioka S. Radial-scanning flexible EUS of the anorectum and pelvis. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 288-297
• 56 Okasha HH, Farouk M, El Hendawy RI. et al. Practical approach to linear EUS examination of the liver. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10: 161-177
• 57 Bapaye A, Aher A. Linear EUS of the anorectum. In: Akahoshi K, Bapaye A. , eds. Practical Handbook of Endoscopic Ultrasonography. Tokyo: Springer; 2012: 293-298
• 58 Harewood GC, Wiersema LM, Halling AC. et al. Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 669-673
• 59 Cote GA, Hovis CE, Kohlmeier C. et al. Training in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: safety and diagnostic yield of attending supervised, trainee-directed FNA from the onset of training. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; 2011: 378540
• 60 Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 33-37
• 61 Lu Y, Chen L, Li C. et al. Diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Med Ultrason 2017; 19: 150-158
• 62 Yamashita Y, Shimokawa T, Napoleon B. et al. Value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography with enhancement pattern for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 125-133
• 63 Fusaroli P, Napoleon B, Gincul R. et al. The clinical impact of ultrasound contrast agents in EUS: a systematic review according to the levels of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 587-596e10
• 64 Dietrich CF, Burmeister S, Hollerbach S. et al. Do we need elastography for EUS?. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 284-290
• 65 Saftoiu A, Napoleon B, Arcidiacono PG. et al. Do we need contrast agents for EUS?. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 361-368
• 66 Education and Practical Standards Committee, European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Minimum training recommendations for the practice of medical ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27: 79-105
• 67 Saftoiu A, Gilja OH, Sidhu PS. et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of elastography in non-hepatic applications: update 2018. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40: 425-453
• 68 Soares JB, Iglesias-Garcia J, Goncalves B. et al. Interobserver agreement of EUS elastography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Ultrasound 2015; 4: 244-249
• 69 Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-hepatic applications: update 2017 (long version). Ultraschall Med 2018; 39: e2-e44
• 70 Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 33-59
• 71 Fusaroli P, Kypraios D, Mancino MG. et al. Interobserver agreement in contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 1063-1069
• 72 Gincul R, Palazzo M, Pujol B. et al. Contrast-harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 373-379
• 73 Soares JB, Iglesias-Garcia J, Goncalves B. et al. Interobserver agreement of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E205-E209
• 74 DiMaio CJ, Mishra G, McHenry L. et al. EUS core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 476-481
• 75 Cassani L, Aihara H, Anand GS. et al. Core curriculum for EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 469-473
• 76 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Faulx AL, Lightdale JR. et al. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 273-281
• 77 Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L. et al. Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1116-1127
• 78 ACE Research Group. Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ. Assessment of competency in endoscopy: establishing and validating generalizable competency benchmarks for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 516-523e1
• 79 Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R. et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut 2014; 63: 1746-1754
• 80 van Vliet EP, Eijkemans MJ, Poley JW. et al. Staging of esophageal carcinoma in a low-volume EUS center compared with reported results from high-volume centers. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 938-947
• 81 Jenssen C, Hocke M, Fusaroli P. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV – EUS-guided interventions: general aspects and EUS-guided sampling (long version). Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: E33-E76
• 82 Shahidi N, Ou G, Lam E. et al. When trainees reach competency in performing endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E239-E243
• 83 Wani S, Han S, Simon V. et al. Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1160-1168e9
• 84 Yang D, Wagh MS, Draganov PV. The status of training in new technologies in advanced endoscopy: from defining competence to credentialing and privileging. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 1016-1025
• 85 Walsh CM. In-training gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tools: Types of tools, validation and impact. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30: 357-374
• 86 Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. NEJM 2007; 356: 387-396
• 87 van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005; 39: 309-317
• 88 Meenan J, Anderson S, Tsang S. et al. Training in radial EUS: what is the best approach and is there a role for the nurse endoscopist?. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 1020-1023
• 89 Wani S, Cote GA, Keswani R. et al. Learning curves for EUS by using cumulative sum analysis: implications for American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 558-565
• 90 Wani S, Hall M, Keswani RN. et al. Variation in aptitude of trainees in endoscopic ultrasonography, based on cumulative sum analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1318-1325e2
• 91 Wani S, Keswani R, Hall M. et al. A prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography among advanced endoscopy trainees: the rapid assessment of trainee endoscopy skills study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 1758-1767e11
• 92 Hedenstrom P, Marasco G, Eusebi LH. et al. GAPS-EUS: a new and reliable tool for the assessment of basic skills and performance in EUS among endosonography trainees. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8: e000660
• 93 Meenan J, Harris K, Oppong K. et al. Service provision and training for endoscopic ultrasound in the UK. Frontline Gastroenterol 2011; 2: 188-194
• 94 Jorgensen JE, Elta GH, Stalburg CM. et al. Do breaks in gastroenterology fellow endoscopy training result in a decrement in competency in colonoscopy?. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 503-509
• 95 Gordon HM, Lloyd DAJ, Higginson A. et al. A regional EUS service using a collaborative network. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017; 8: 26-28
• 96 Quispel R, van Driel L, Honkoop P. et al. Collaboration of community hospital endosonographers improves diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasonography guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E800-E807
• 97 Sahai AV, James PD, Levy MJ. et al. Evidence-based recommendations for establishing and implementing an EUS program: Recommendations for sustainable success and improved clinical outcomes across the continuum of care. Endosc Ultrasound 2020; 9: 1-5
• 98 Ho KY. Survey of endoscopic ultrasonographic practice and training in the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 1231-1235
• 99 Schutz HM, Quispel R, Veldt BJ. et al. Cumulative sum learning curves guiding multicenter multidisciplinary quality improvement of EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E549-E557
• 100 ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Forbes N, Coelho-Prabhu N. et al. Adverse events associated with EUS and EUS-guided procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 16-26e2
• 101 Nass KJ, van der Schaar PJ, van der Vlugt M. et al. Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 488-495