Die lumbale Spinalkanalstenose

Degenerative Veränderungen der Lendenwirbelsäule und die damit einhergehenden symptomatischen Krankheitsbilder zählen zu den am häufigsten diagnostizierten Krankheitsbildern. Der Beitrag thematisiert das Management der lumbalen Spinalkanalstenose, die zu erheblichen Schmerzen, neurologischen Ausfällen und einer stark eingeschränkten Lebensqualität der betroffenen Patienten führen kann.

Schlüsselwörter

lumbale Spinalkanalstenose - Claudicatio spinalis - Wirbelsäulendekompression - Cross-over-Technik - Wirbelsäulenchirurgie

• Literatur

• 1 Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesundheit, Diagnosedaten der Patienten und Patientinnen in Krankenhäusern 2021. Fachserie 12 Reihe 6.2.1. Accessed September 24, 2021 at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/Publikationen/Downloads-Krankenhaeuser/grunddaten-krankenhaeuser-2120611217004.html
• 2 Verbiest H. Results of surgical treatment of idiopathic developmental stenosis of the lumbar vertebral canal. A review of twenty-seven years’ experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1977; 59: 181-188
• 3 Sarpyener MA. Spina bifida aperta and congenital stricture of the spinal canal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1947; 29: 817-821
• 4 Johnsson KE. Lumbar spinal stenosis. A retrospective study of 163 cases in southern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66: 403-405
• 5 Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K. et al. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1978; 3: 319-328
• 6 Park JB, Chang JK, Lee JK. Quantitative analysis of transforming growth factor-beta 1 in ligamentum flavum of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: E492-E495
• 7 Kobayashi S, Kokubo Y, Uchida K. et al. Effect of lumbar nerve root compression on primary sensory neurons and their central branches: changes in the nociceptive neuropeptides substance P and somatostatin. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 276-282
• 8 Kobayashi S, Baba H, Uchida K. et al. [Blood circulation of cauda equina and nerve root]. Clin Calcium 2005; 15: 63-72
• 9 Chosa E, Sekimoto S, Kubo N. et al. Evaluation of circulatory compromise in the leg in lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (431) 129-133
• 10 Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A. et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 1919-1924
• 11 Athiviraham A, Yen D. Is spinal stenosis better treated surgically or nonsurgically?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 90-93
• 12 Siepe CJ, Bridts AL, Ayman M. et al. Full-endoscopic bilateral over-the-top decompression in lumbar central stenosis: surgical technique and outcomes. Eur Spine J 2023; 32: 2918-2923
• 13 RIWOspine. Advanced Techniques in Full-Endoscopic Decompression by Prof. Dr. Christoph Siepe. Accessed September 24, 2023 at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OuX_Wh_g2k
• 14 RIWOspine. RIWOspine full-endoscopic over-the-top decompression performed by Prof. Dr. Christoph Siepe, Munich. Accessed September 24, 2023 at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pj-DrGaU1IQ&t
• 15 Mayer HM, Heider F. Selektive, mikrochirurgische „Cross-over“-Dekompression mehrsegmentaler lumbaler Spinalstenosen. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2013; 25: 47-62
• 16 Mayer HM, Heider F. “Slalom”: microsurgical cross-over decompression for multilevel degenerative lumbar stenosis. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 9074257
• 17 Mayer HM. Microsurgical Decompression of acquired (degenerative) central and lateral spinal Canal Stenosis. In: Mayer HM. Minimally invasive Spine Surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; 2000: 105-116
• 18 Papavero L, Thiel M, Fritzsche E. et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis: Prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach. Neurosurgery 2009; 65: 182-187
• 19 Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Rodgers JA. Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: S355-S360
• 20 Aalto T, Sinikallio S, Kröger H. et al. Preoperative predictors for good postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery–a prospective observational study with a two-year follow-up. Scand J Surg 2012; 101: 255-260
• 21 Toyoda H, Nakamura H, Konishi S. et al. Clinical outcome of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 410-415
• 22 Yagi M, Okada E, Ninomiya K. et al. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 10: 293-299
• 23 Sasai K, Umeda M, Maruyama T. et al. Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 9: 55-59
• 24 Müslüman AM, Cansever T, Yilmaz A. et al. Midterm outcome after a microsurgical unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2012; 16: 68-76
• 25 Matsumura A, Namikawa T, Terai H. et al. The influence of approach side on facet preservation in microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 13: 758-765
• 26 Kelleher M, Timlin M, Persaud O. et al. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E981-E987
• 27 Kleinstück FS, Grob D, Lattig F. et al. The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 1198-1203