Risks Associated with Prolonged Latent Phase of Labor

Abstract

Objective

We sought to assess the impact of a prolonged latent phase (PLP) on maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Study Design

This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study conducted 2010 to 2015 that included all term gravidas who reached active labor (6 cm). Primary outcomes were composite maternal morbidity (maternal fever, postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, and severe perineal lacerations) and composite neonatal morbidity (respiratory distress syndrome, mechanical ventilation, birth injury, seizures, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia, or umbilical artery pH ≤ 7.1). Outcomes were compared between patients with and without PLP, defined as ≥90th percentile of labor duration between admission and active phase. Results were stratified by induction of labor (IOL) versus spontaneous labor. A stratified analysis was performed by mode of delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.

Results

In this cohort of 6,509 patients, 51% underwent IOL. A total of 650 patients had a PLP with a median length of 8.5 hours in spontaneous labor and 18.8 hours in IOL. Among patients with PLP, there was a significant increase in composite maternal morbidity with both IOL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.84) and spontaneous labor (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.04) and an increase in composite neonatal morbidity with spontaneous labor only (aOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.45). Cesarean delivery occurred more often in PLP group (14.0 vs. 25.1%). Among patients who underwent cesarean delivery, PLP remained associated with increased odds of maternal morbidity compared with those with normal latent phase.

Conclusion

PLP at or above the 90th percentile in patients who reach active labor is associated with increased risk of maternal morbidity that is not mediated by cesarean delivery. PLP in spontaneous labor is associated with increased neonatal morbidity. These data suggest that further research is needed to establish latent phase cut-offs that may be incorporated into labor management guidelines.

Key Points

• Latent labor ≥90th percentile is associated with increased maternal morbidity in induced and spontaneous labor.

• Latent labor ≥90th percentile in spontaneous but not induced labor is associated with increased neonatal morbidity.

• Cesarean delivery alone does not explain this increased maternal morbidity.

Keywords

labor dystocia - maternal morbidity - neonatal morbidity

• References

• 1 Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (03) 179-193
• 2 Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118 (01) 29-38
• 3 Friedman EA. An objective approach to the diagnosis and management of abnormal labor. Bull N Y Acad Med 1972; 48 (06) 842-858
• 4 Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware Branch D. et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (06) 1281-1287
• 5 Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, López JD, Macones GA. A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (05) 523.e1-523.e12
• 6 Blankenship SA, Raghuraman N, Delhi A. et al. Association of abnormal first stage of labor duration and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (03) 445.e1-445.e15
• 7 Goetzl L. Maternal fever in labor: etiologies, consequences, and clinical management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228 (5S): S1274-S1282
• 8 Bailey EJ, Frolova AI, López JD, Raghuraman N, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Mild neonatal acidemia is associated with neonatal morbidity at term. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (S 01): e155-e161
• 9 Aziken ME, Orhue AA, Okonkwo AC, Osazuwa HO. Maternal and fetal outcome after a prolonged latent phase of labour. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 22 (02) 171-176
• 10 Maghoma J, Buchmann EJ. Maternal and fetal risks associated with prolonged latent phase of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22 (01) 16-19
• 11 Chelmow D, Kilpatrick SJ, Laros Jr RK. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81 (04) 486-491
• 12 Tilden EL, Caughey AB, Ahlberg M. et al. Latent phase duration and associated outcomes: a contemporary, population-based observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228 (5S): S1025 , 1036.e9
• 13 Induction of labor. ACOG practice bulletin no. 107. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (2 Pt 1): 386-397
• 14 Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96 (5 Pt 1): 671-677
• 15 Simon CE, Grobman WA. When has an induction failed?. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (04) 705-709
• 16 Kawakita T, Reddy UM, Iqbal SN. et al. Duration of oxytocin and rupture of the membranes before diagnosing a failed induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (02) 373-380
• 17 Harper LM, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Zhao Q, Cahill AG. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (06) 1113-1118