RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2593-4919
Feasibility and Efficacy of Transdermal Skin Contour Sutures: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Study
Autoren
Abstract
Introduction
Achieving optimal contour and projection of the nasal tip is one of the most challenging aspects of rhinoplasty. The skin-soft tissue envelope (STE) plays a pivotal role in determining the final outcome, as its thickness and elasticity significantly impact the predictability of postoperative results. Avoiding dead space in the lower third of the nose is essential to ensure consistent outcomes. Recently, transcutaneous skin contour sutures (TSCS) have been proposed to enhance the precision of tip definition and contouring, particularly in patients with thick STE. To mitigate risks such as skin necrosis or scarring associated with traditional TSCS techniques, we modified the approach by placing the knot of the transdermal contour suture on the internal nasal surface.
Methods
A retrospective, propensity-score matched analysis was conducted on 159 patients who underwent rhinoplasty. After matching, two cohorts of 120 patients were retained: 60 patients underwent rhinoplasty with TSCS, while the control cohort of 60 patients underwent rhinoplasty without TSCS. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were utilized to evaluate functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Results
Using PROMs, we found significant improvements in mean preoperative scores for all PROMs in both cohorts. Postoperative assessments revealed that while the overall healing trajectories were not significantly different, TSCS offered notable early benefits in nasal contour and patient satisfaction, especially during the first 3 to 6 months postoperatively.
Conclusion
The modified TSCS technique shows significant early postoperative benefits, particularly in the first 3 to 6 months. However, the overall healing trajectories over 12 months of follow-up were similar between both groups. This suggests that while TSCS has a short-term impact, the natural healing processes in both groups likely converge over time, leading to a diminishing of observable differences. Future research should focus on identifying patient subgroups that experience the greatest benefits from TSCS. The level of evidence is 3.
* These authors share co-first authorship of this article.
Declaration of GenAI Use
During the writing process of this paper, the authors used Reverso for language support. The authors reviewed and edited the text and take full responsibility for the content of the paper.
Publikationsverlauf
Accepted Manuscript online:
24. April 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Mai 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Aydın C, Yücel ÖT, Akçalar S. et al. Role of steroid injection for skin thickness and edema in rhinoplasty patients. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2021; 6 (04) 628-633
- 2 Layliev J, Gupta V, Kaoutzanis C. et al. Incidence and preoperative risk factors for major complications in aesthetic rhinoplasty: analysis of 4978 patients. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (07) 757-767
- 3 Guyuron B, DeLuca L, Lash R. Supratip deformity: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (03) 1140-1151 , discussion 1152–1153
- 4 Davis RE, Hrisomalos EN. Surgical management of the thick-skinned nose. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (01) 22-28
- 5 Cobo R, Vitery L. Isotretinoin use in thick-skinned rhinoplasty patients. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (06) 656-661
- 6 Irvine LE, Nassif PS. Use of 5-fluorouracil for management of the thick-skinned nose. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (01) 9-13
- 7 Kosins AM. Comprehensive diagnosis and planning for the difficult rhinoplasty patient: applications in ultrasonography and treatment of the soft-tissue envelope. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (05) 509-518
- 8 Bitik O, Uzun H, Konaş E. Scroll reconstruction: Fine tuning of the interface between middle and lower thirds in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2019; 39 (05) 481-494
- 9 Robotti E, Leone F, Malfussi VA, Cottone G. The “3 points compartmentalization” technique in subperichondrial-subperiosteal dissection in primary rhinoplasty to reduce edema and define contour. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (04) 1923-1931
- 10 Zholtikov V, Kosins A, Ouerghi R, Daniel RK. Skin contour sutures in rhinoplasty. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43 (04) 422-432
- 11 Pollock T, Pollock H. Progressive tension sutures in abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2004; 31 (04) 583-589 , vi
- 12 Jabbour S, Awaida C, Mhawej R, Bassilios Habre S, Nasr M. Does the addition of progressive tension sutures to drains reduce seroma incidence after abdominoplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (04) 440-447
- 13 Klassen AF, Cano SJ, East CA. et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q scales for patients undergoing rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (01) 27-35
- 14 Pingnet L, Verkest V, Fransen E, Declau F. Dutch translation and validation of the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module. Facial Plast Surg 2021; 37 (03) 296-301
- 15 Moubayed SP, Ioannidis JPA, Saltychev M, Most SP. The 10-item standardized cosmesis and health nasal outcomes survey (SCHNOS) for functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (01) 37-42
- 16 Lohuis PJFM, Hakim S, Duivesteijn W, Knobbe A, Tasman AJ. Benefits of a short, practical questionnaire to measure subjective perception of nasal appearance after aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (06) 913e-923e
- 17 Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM. et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the nasal obstruction septoplasty effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (03) 283-290
- 18 Gerbault O, Daniel RK, Kosins AM. The role of piezoelectric instrumentation in rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (01) 21-34
- 19 de Souza RJ, Eisen RB, Perera S. et al. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: sensitivity analyses in randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103 (01) 5-17
- 20 Verkest V, Pingnet L, Van Hout G, Fransen E, Declau F. Comparison in patient satisfaction between structural component and hybrid T-bar preservation rhinoplasty: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (06) 2598-2608
- 21 Kovacevic M, Veit JA, Toriumi DM. Subdorsal Z-flap: a modification of the Cottle technique in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 29 (04) 244-251
- 22 Ferreira MG, Monteiro D, Reis C, Almeida e Sousa C. Spare roof technique: a middle third new technique. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (01) 111-116
- 23 Verkest V, Pingnet L, Fransen E, Declau F. Multidimensionality of patient-reported outcome measures in rhinoplasty satisfaction. Facial Plast Surg 2022; 38 (05) 468-476
- 24 Saltychev M, Kandathil CK, Abdelwahab M, Spataro EA, Moubayed SP, Most SP. Psychometric properties of the standardized cosmesis and health nasal outcomes survey: item response theory analysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (06) 519-521
- 25 Guyuron B, Lee M. An effective algorithm for management of noses with thick skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (02) 381-387
- 26 Whitaker EG, Johnson Jr CM. Skin and subcutaneous tissue in rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002; 26 (Suppl. 01) S19
- 27 Ozucer B, Yildirim YS, Veyseller B. et al. Effect of postrhinoplasty taping on postoperative edema and nasal draping a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 157-163
- 28 Cobo R, Camacho JG, Orrego J. Integrated management of the thick-skinned rhinoplasty patient. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (01) 3-8
- 29 Hudson DA, Adams S. Quilting sutures in open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (04) 724e-725e
- 30 Ouldamer L, Bonastre J, Brunet-Houdard S, Body G, Giraudeau B, Caille A. Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (04) e009903
- 31 Titley OG, Spyrou GE, Fatah MFT. Preventing seroma in the latissimus dorsi flap donor site. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50 (02) 106-108
- 32 Baroudi R, Ferreira CAA. Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J 1998; 18 (06) 439-441
