Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy: excellent results, but will mucosal exposure devices push this boundary?

• References

• 1 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700
• 2 Aniwan S, Mekritthikrai K, Kerr SJ. et al. Computer-aided detection, mucosal exposure device, their combination, and standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 507-516
• 3 Haghbin H, Zakirkhodjaev N, Beran A. et al. G-EYE improves polyp, adenoma, and serrated polyp detection rates in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 58: 668-673
• 4 Chirapongsathorn S, Suzuki S, Prasanwon P. et al. Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia. Dig Dis 2025; 43: 215-224
• 5 Rocchetto S, Rondonotti E, Alicante S. et al. Added value of a balloon-based mucosal exposure device in computer-aided detection-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial (COMBAT study). Endoscopy 2025;
• 6 Rondonotti E, Di Paolo D, Rizzotto ER. et al. Efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in a fecal immunochemical test-based organized colorectal cancer screening program: a randomized controlled trial (AIFIT study). Endoscopy 2022; 54: 1171-1179
• 7 Hassan C, Senore C, Radaelli F. et al. Full-spectrum (FUSE) versus standard forward-viewing colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme. Gut 2017; 66: 1949-1955
• 8 Williet N, Tournier Q, Vernet C. et al. Effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 846-860