Is Blood Flow Restriction During Warm-Up Able to Alter the Performance of Soccer Players?

We sought to evaluate the effects of a low-intensity warm-up with blood flow restriction (BFR) compared to low- and high-intensity warm-up on performance and perceptual responses. A randomized, controlled, crossover clinical trial was conducted with 33 soccer players, divided into three experimental conditions: warm-up at 30% of VO₂ peak, warm-up at 80% of VO₂ peak, and warm-up at 30% of VO₂ peak combined with BFR at 80% of total occlusion pressure. Vertical jump and sprint tests, muscle pain, perception of effort, discomfort in relation to BFR, and myotonometry were measured before, immediately post, and 10 and 20 minutes post warm-up. No difference was observed between experimental conditions, and no interaction between conditions vs. moments for the performance. In the condition with BFR, there was a difference for the effort perceived and the perception of discomfort in relation to the BFR technique, indicating greater perception of effort and level of discomfort. For myotonometry, differences were found, indicating lower muscle elasticity in the condition with BFR. The low-intensity warm-up with BFR as well as the low- and high-intensity warm-up without BFR resulted in similar performances. Furthermore, although perception of discomfort was greater in the warm-up condition with BFR, it can be attenuated with different BFR protocols.

Keywords

warm-up exercise - vascular occlusion - performance - pain

• References

• 1 Hedrick A. Physiological responses to warm-up. J Strength Cond Res 1992; 14: 25-27
• 2 Knudson DV. Warm-up and flexibility. In: Chandler TJ, Brown LE, editors Conditioning for strength and human performance. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins; 2008
• 3 Smith CA. The warm-up procedure: to stretch or not to stretch. A brief review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1994. 19. 12-17
• 4 Thacker SB, Gilchrist J, Stroup DF. et al. The impact of stretching on sports injury risk: a systematic review of the literature. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 371-378
• 5 Fradkin AJ, Zazryn TR, Smoliga JM. Effects of warming-up on physical performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 140-148
• 6 Robergs RA, Pascoe DD, Costill DL. et al. Effects of warm-up on muscle glycogenolysis during intense exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 37-43
• 7 Tsurubami R, Oba K, Samukawa M. et al. Warm-up intensity and time course effects on jump performance. J Sports Sci Med 2020; 19: 714-720
• 8 Slysz J, Stultz J, Burr JF. The efficacy of blood flow restricted exercise: A systematic review & meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport 2016; 19: 669-675
• 9 Pearson SJ, Hussain SR. A review on the mechanisms of blood-flow restriction resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy. Sports Med 2015; 45: 187-200
• 10 Bishop D. Warm up I: potential mechanisms and the effects of passive warm up on exercise performance. Sports Med 2003; 33: 439-454
• 11 Doma K, Leicht AS, Boullosa D, Woods CT. Lunge exercises with blood-flow restriction induces post-activation potentiation and improves vertical jump performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 687-695
• 12 McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES. et al. Defining training and performance caliber: A participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 317-331
• 13 Dankel SJ, Buckner SL, Counts BR. et al. The acute muscular response to two distinct blood flow restriction protocols. Physiol Int 2017; 104: 64-76
• 14 Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 2005; 37: 379-384
• 15 Cerqueira MS, Kovacs D, França IM. et al. Effects of individualized ischemic preconditioning on protection against eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage: a randomized controlled trial. Sports Health 2021; 13: 554-564
• 16 Hughes L, Jeffries O, Waldron M. et al. Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions. PeerJ 2018; 6: e4697
• 17 Patterson SD, Hughes L, Warmington S. et al. Blood flow restriction exercise: considerations of methodology, application, and safety. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 533
• 18 Lixandrão ME, Ugrinowitsch C, Laurentino G. et al. Effects of exercise intensity and occlusion pressure after 12 weeks of resistance training with blood-flow restriction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 2471-2480
• 19 Hanson NJ, Scheadler CM, Lee TL. et al. Modality determines VO_2max achieved in self-paced exercise tests: validation with the Bruce protocol. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 1313-1319
• 20 Panissa VLG, Fukuda DH, Caldeira RS. et al. Is oxygen uptake measurement enough to estimate energy expenditure during high-intensity intermittent exercise? Quantification of anaerobic contribution by different methods. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 868
• 21 Cabral-Santos C, Gerosa-Neto J, Inoue DS. et al. Physiological acute response to high-intensity intermittent and moderate-intensity continuous 5 km running performance: implications for training prescription. J Hum Kinet 2017; 56: 127-137
• 22 Petronijevic MS, Garcia Ramos A, Mirkov DM. et al. Self-preferred initial position could be a viable alternative to the standard squat jump testing procedure. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 3267-3275
• 23 Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I. et al. Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. J Strength Cond Res 2004; 18: 551-555
• 24 Chaouachi A, Manzi V, Chaalali A. et al. Determinants analysis of change-of-direction ability in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 2667-2676
• 25 Marques MC, Gabbett TJ, Marinho DA. et al. Influence of strength, sprint running, and combined strength and sprint running training on short sprint performance in young adults. Int J Sports Med 2015; 36: 789-795
• 26 Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity-rating scales. Pain 2011; 152: 2399-2404
• 27 Brandt M, Jakobsen MD, Thorborg K. et al. Perceived loading and muscle activity during hip strengthening exercises: comparison of elastic resistance and machine exercises. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013; 8: 811-819
• 28 Loenneke JP, Kim D, Mouser JG. et al. Are there perceptual differences to varying levels of blood flow restriction?. Physiol Behav 2016; 157: 277-280
• 29 Friedmann-Bette B, Bauer T, Kinscherf R. et al. Effects of strength training with eccentric overload on muscle adaptation in male athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 108: 821-836
• 30 Agyapong-Badu S, Aird L, Bailey L. et al. Interrater reliability of muscle tone, stiffness and elasticity measurements of rectus femoris and biceps brachii in healthy young and older males. Working Pap Health Sci 2013; 1: 1-11
• 31 Van Deun B, Hobbelen JSM, Cagnie B. et al. Reproducible measurements of muscle characteristics using the myotonpro device: comparison between individuals with and without paratonia. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2018; 41: 194-203
• 32 Silva LM, Neiva HP, Marques MC. et al. Effects of warm-up, post-warm-up, and re-warm-up strategies on explosive efforts in team sports: A systematic review. Sports Med 2018; 48: 2285-2299
• 33 Miller BC, Tirko AW, Shipe JM. et al. The systemic effects of blood flow restriction training: A systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2021; 16: 978-990
• 34 Rotllan C, Corbi F, Viscor G. Muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity in elite female cyclists after consecutive short competitions. Transl Sports Med 2024; 2024: 2434494
• 35 Bailey L, Samuel D, Warner M. Parameter representing muscle tone, elasticity and stiffness of biceps brachii in healthy older males: Symmetry and within-session reliability using the myotonPRO. J Neurol Disord 2013; 1: 1000116
• 36 Bruschetta D, Milardi D, Trimarchi F. et al. Muscle contracture diagnosis: the role of sonoelastography. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016; 56: 1518-1525