Download PDF
Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2025; 13(01): e35-e40
DOI: 10.1055/a-2663-1933
Case Report

Acute Urinary Retention Secondary to Urethral Lithiasis in a 4-Year-Old Boy: How We Managed This Rare Case

Authors

  • Thibault Planchamp 

    1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, Occitanie, France

  • Pierre Estournes

    2   Department of Urology, Hôpital de Rangueil, Toulouse, Occitanie, France

  • Adrien Boileau

    2   Department of Urology, Hôpital de Rangueil, Toulouse, Occitanie, France

  • Solène Joseph

    1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, Occitanie, France

  • Mathilde Piraprez

    1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, Occitanie, France

  • Florian Laclergerie

    2   Department of Urology, Hôpital de Rangueil, Toulouse, Occitanie, France

  • Luana Carfagna

    1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, Occitanie, France

  • Olivier Abbo 

    1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hôpital des Enfants, Toulouse, Occitanie, France
Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Urethral stone impaction (USI) is an extremely rare cause of acute urinary retention (AUR) in pediatric urology. Few case reports are available, and no consensus guidelines currently exist for managing this condition. We describe our management of such a case and provide a review of the relevant literature. A 4-year-old boy with no prior urological history presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain lasting 8 days. An ultrasound performed 5 days earlier identified a 7-mm stone at the ureterovesical junction. Symptomatic treatment with paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was initiated. However, dysuria, painful penile swelling, and AUR developed 7 days after the onset of pain. A CT scan revealed bilateral hydronephrosis, urinary retention, and a 9-mm stone (980 Hounsfield Units) that had migrated to the proximal anterior urethra. Under general anesthesia, a suprapubic puncture removed 400 mL of urine for analysis. A 7.5-Fr cystoscope was used to identify an impacted stone at the base of the penile urethra. In situ lithotripsy was performed using a holmium laser to fragment the stone in the urethra. The fragments were then pushed into the bladder for complete disintegration. Intravesical fragments were subsequently removed with a Dormia basket. No urethral wounds were observed, and a 10-Fr catheter was placed. Recovery was uneventful, with catheter removal and spontaneous voiding on postoperative day 1. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient exhibited normal voiding and uroflowmetry. AUR secondary to USI is rare and lacks standardized management protocols in pediatric urology. Management of USI should be tailored to the size and location of the calculus, as well as the presence of any associated urethral pathology, with a preference for minimally invasive endoscopic surgery whenever possible. If necessary, urethral in situ laser lithotripsy appears to be a safe and effective treatment option to consider.

Keywords

urolithiasis - urethral calculi - pediatric urology - laser lithotripsy - endoscopy


Publication History

Received: 13 April 2025

Accepted: 12 July 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 July 2025

Article published online:
05 August 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany