Reply to Maida et al.

Endoscopy 2025; 57(11): 1314-1315
DOI: 10.1055/a-2688-2535

Letter to the editor

Authors

Daryl Ramai

¹Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN1861)
Abdulrahman Qatomah

¹Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN1861)

²King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Hiroyuki Aihara

¹Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN1861)

References
1 Maida M, Facciorusso A, Sferrazza S. Comment on: “Performance of three major techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis’ – more questions than answers?. Endoscopy 2025; 57
2 Ramai D, Qatomah A, Chun M. et al. Performance of three major techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2025;
3 Maida M, Facciorusso A, Marasco G. et al. Comparative efficacy of different techniques for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Liver Dis 2025; 57: 527-534