Improving the Relevance of Research in Homeopathy

• References

• 1 Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G. et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834-843
• 2 Mathie RT, Lloyd SM, Legg LA. et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 142
• 3 Mathie RT, Ramparsad N, Legg LA. et al. Randomised controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2017; 6: 63
• 4 Ramsey S, Scoggins J. Commentary: practicing on the tip of an information iceberg? Evidence of underpublication of registered clinical trials in oncology. Oncologist 2008; 13: 925-929
• 5 Tannock IF, Amir E, Booth CM. et al. Relevance of randomised controlled trials in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17: e560-e567
• 6 Witt CM, Brinkhaus B, Pach D. et al. Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 413
• 7 Lüdtke R, Rutten ALB, Frei H, van Haselen RA, Fisher P, Bell IR. Guidelines for case reports in homeopathy (HOM-CASE): expanding the CARE guidelines. Homeopathy 2009; 98: 263-266
• 8 Relton C, Torgerson D, O'Cathain A, Nicholl J. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the “cohort multiple RCT” design. BMJ 2010; 340: c1066
• 9 Ulbrich-Zürni S, Teut M, Roll S, Mathie RT. The N-of-1 clinical trial: a timely research opportunity in homeopathy. Homeopathy 2018; 107: 10-18
• 10 Shamseer L, Sampson M, Bukutu C. et al. CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2015; 350: h1793
• 11 Rutten L. Data collection: treat every variable as a treasure. Homeopathy 2015; 104: 190-196