Abstract
68Ga-Pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography has
shown potential in primary aldosteronism subtyping, but analysis of its
diagnostic accuracy based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography concordance
and positron emission tomography/computed tomography avidity patterns is
lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of
68Ga-Pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography
for subtyping primary aldosteronism and to assess its performance based on
concordance with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission
tomography/computed tomography avidity patterns. Clinical, biochemical,
radiological, functional imaging, treatment, histopathological, and follow-up
details of 30 patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent positron
emission tomography/computed tomography over 2 years at a tertiary center in
India were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy of positron emission
tomography/computed tomography for primary aldosteronism subtyping was evaluated
in the whole cohort and in subgroups based on contrast-enhanced computed
tomography–positron emission tomography/computed tomography concordance and
positron emission tomography/computed tomography avidity patterns. Out of the 30
patients, final subtype classification was achieved in 15 (9 unilateral and 6
bilateral) based on surgical outcomes and/or adrenal venous sampling. Positron
emission tomography/computed tomography correctly subtyped 14/15 (93.3%)
patients. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission
tomography/computed tomography concordance was seen in 10 patients, and positron
emission tomography/computed tomography accuracy was 100% (10/10) in this
subgroup. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission
tomography/computed tomography discordance (contrast-enhanced computed
tomography bilateral and positron emission tomography/computed tomography
unilateral) was seen in five patients, and positron emission tomography/computed
tomography accuracy in this subgroup was 80% (4/5). Positron emission
tomography/computed tomography avidity patterns in the 15 patients having final
subtype classification were unilateral avid (n=10), bilateral avid
(n=2), and bilateral nonavid (n=3). Diagnostic accuracy of
positron emission tomography/computed tomography was 90% (9/10) in patients with
unilateral avidity, and 100% in those with bilateral avidity or nonavidity.
Preliminary analysis suggests that positron emission tomography/computed
tomography demonstrates higher accuracy in certain subgroups, potentially
guiding the triage for adrenal venous sampling.
Keywords
68Ga-Pentixafor - PET/CT - primary aldosteronism - subtyping - CT concordance