Reply to Gao et al.

Endoscopy 2025; 57(11): 1321-1322
DOI: 10.1055/a-2702-3082

Letter to the editor

Authors

Carlos Fernandes

¹Programme in Health Data Science, Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Medicina, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN26705)
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro

²Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal, Porto, Portugal

³MEDCIDS, Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Medicina, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN26705)

References
1 Fernandes C, Estevinho M, Marques Cruz M. et al. Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2025; 57: 49-61
2 Lee R, Holmes D. Barriers and recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in Africa. Glob Health Action 2023; 16: 2181920
3 Hernandez L, Deas TM, Catalano MF. et al. Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: a report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 835-411
4 Barua I, Vinsard DG, Jodal HC. et al. Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 277-284
5 Budzyń K, Romańczyk M, Kitala D. et al. Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a multicentre, observational study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025; 10: 896-903