Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2721-3151
Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding following cold snare polypectomy of lesions <10 mm in patients on high-dose antithrombotic therapy: insights from a Dutch colonoscopy cohort
Authors

Abstract
Background
Current guidelines state that low-risk polypectomies (cold snare polypectomies of lesions <10 mm) can be safely performed with continuation of single antiplatelet therapy (low-dose antithrombotic therapy [ATT]). The safety of low-risk polypectomies with continuation of an anticoagulant or dual antiplatelet therapy (high-dose ATT) is uncertain.
Methods
Data from 31 325 colonoscopies performed at two Dutch endoscopy centers were analyzed. The centers followed different protocols for the management of ATT around colonoscopies. Incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) and thromboembolic events with continuation or discontinuation of different ATTs around colonoscopy were analyzed.
Results
The overall incidence of DPPB for colonoscopies with only low-risk polypectomies was 11/12 291 (0.09%). The incidence of DPPB was similar for patients continuing either high- or low-dose ATT (0.58% vs. 0.30%; P = 0.61). Although the incidence of DPPB significantly differed between patients on continued high-dose and no ATT (0.58% vs. 0.07%; P = 0.04), the absolute risk difference was small (0.67%) and the number of patients required to discontinue high-dose ATT to prevent one case of DPPB was estimated at 150. The severity of DPPBs was comparable between all groups. The incidence of thromboembolic events with ATT discontinuation was 2/1098 (0.18%).
Conclusion
The risk of DPPB after low-risk polypectomies was similar for patients who continued high- and low-dose ATT. Although higher compared with patients without ATT, the incidence of DPPB with continued high-dose ATT remains very low. Therefore, we suggest continuation of high-dose ATT for colonoscopy indications with a low risk of detecting advanced polyps.
Publication History
Received: 20 April 2025
Accepted after revision: 08 October 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
10 October 2025
Article published online:
20 November 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
- 2 Loberg M, Kalager M, Holme O. et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 799-807
- 3 Reumkens A, Rondagh EJ, Bakker CM. et al. Post-colonoscopy complications: a systematic review, time trends, and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 1092-1101
- 4 Tagawa T, Yamada M, Minagawa T. et al. Endoscopic characteristics influencing postpolypectomy bleeding in 1147 consecutive pedunculated colonic polyps: a multicenter retrospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 803-811.e806
- 5 Yeh JH, Wang WL, Lin CW. et al. Safety of cold snare polypectomy with periprocedural antithrombotic agents for colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15: 17562848211070717
- 6 Zhang X, Jiang X, Shi L. Risk factors for delayed colorectal postpolypectomy bleeding: a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24: 162
- 7 Fujimoto K, Fujishiro M, Kato M. et al. Guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 1-14
- 8 Acosta RD, Abraham NS, Chandrasekhara V. et al. The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 3-16
- 9 Kato M, Uedo N, Hokimoto S. et al. Guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment: 2017 appendix on anticoagulants including direct oral anticoagulants. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 433-440
- 10 Chan FKL, Goh KL, Reddy N. et al. Management of patients on antithrombotic agents undergoing emergency and elective endoscopy: joint Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE) and Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE) practice guidelines. Gut 2018; 67: 405-417
- 11 Veitch AM, Radaelli F, Alikhan R. et al. Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline update. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 947-969
- 12 Chan FKL, Kyaw MH, Hsiang JC. et al. Risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with uninterrupted clopidogrel therapy in an industry-independent, double-blind, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 918-925.e911
- 13 Li DF, Chang X, Fang X. et al. Colonoscopic post-polypectomy bleeding in patients on uninterrupted clopidogrel therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2020; 19: 3211-3218
- 14 Li YK, Guo CG, Cheung KS. et al. Risk of postcolonoscopy thromboembolic events: a real-world cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 3051-3059.e3054
- 15 Zhu Y-F, Ma J-H, Qian H. et al. Risks of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing colonoscopy on uninterrupted and interrupted anticoagulant therapy in real-world setting. Thromb Res 2024; 241: 109107
- 16 Won D, Kim JS, Ji JS. et al. Cold snare polypectomy in patients taking dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized trial of discontinuation of thienopyridines. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2019; 10: e00091
- 17 Ket S, Hewett DG, Kheir AO. et al. Cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm on clopidogrel: Australian and New Zealand randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E745-e752
- 18 Matsumoto M, Yoshii S, Shigesawa T. et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for colorectal polyps in patients on antithrombotic medication. Digestion 2018; 97: 76-81
- 19 Arimoto J, Chiba H, Ashikari K. et al. Safety of cold snare polypectomy in patients receiving treatment with antithrombotic agents. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 3247-3255
- 20 Makino T, Horiuchi A, Kajiyama M. et al. Delayed bleeding following cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps in patients taking antithrombotic agents. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 52: 502-507
- 21 Hayasaka J, Yamashita S, Matsui A. et al. Safety of cold snare polypectomy during continuous use of antithrombotic drugs for delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: a pilot study. Dig Dis 2023; 41: 729-736
- 22 Nass KJ, van der Schaar PJ, van der Vlugt M. et al. Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 488-495
- 23 Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M. et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1078-1085.e1078
- 24 Jaruvongvanich V, Prasitlumkum N, Assavapongpaiboon B. et al. Risk factors for delayed colonic post-polypectomy bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32: 1399-1406
- 25 Twisk JWR. Applied multilevel analysis: a practical guide for medical researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006;
- 26 Morita A, Horiuchi I, Tanaka N. et al. Managing bleeding risk after cold snare polypectomy in patients receiving direct-acting oral anticoagulants. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 969-974
- 27 Aizawa M, Utano K, Nemoto D. et al. Risk of delayed bleeding after cold snare polypectomy in patients with antithrombotic therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67: 1869-1878
- 28 Yabe K, Horiuchi A, Kudo T. et al. Risk of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedure-related bleeding in patients with or without continued antithrombotic therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66: 1548-1555
- 29 Øines M, Helsingen LM, Bretthauer M. et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of colorectal polyps. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31: 419-424
- 30 Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Craanen ME, van der Hulst RW. et al. Colonoscopic yield of colorectal neoplasia in daily clinical practice. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1085-1092
- 31 Fernandes C, Estevinho M, Marques Cruz M. et al. Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2024; 57: 49-61
- 32 Brenner H, Haug U, Arndt V. et al. Low risk of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas more than 10 years after negative colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 870-876
- 33 The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Monitor Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme 2022. Bilthoven, Utrecht: RIVM; 2023. Accessed: December 19, 2024. https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2023–12/Monitor-2022-darmkanker-eindnoten_0.pdf
- 34 The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Monitor Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme 2023. Bilthoven, Utrecht: RIVM; 2024. Accessed: December 19, 2024. https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2024–11/DK%20Monitor2023-ENG.pdf
- 35 Noordzij M, van Diepen M, Caskey FC. et al. Relative risk versus absolute risk: one cannot be interpreted without the other. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2017; 32: ii13-ii18
