Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000128.xml
physioscience 2026; 22(01): 1-2
DOI: 10.1055/a-2750-8299
DOI: 10.1055/a-2750-8299
Editorial
Artificial Intelligence in Physiotherapy: Where do we stand?
Article in several languages: deutsch | EnglishAuthors
Back in the year 2021, a group of authors (Rowe et al.), already published an article entitled “How to replace a physiotherapist: artificial intelligence and the redistribution of expertise” [1] in the journal Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. So, is traditional physiotherapy on the brink of extinction in the year 2026, or have we already passed that point?
Publication History
Article published online:
27 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Rowe M, Nicholls DA, Shaw J. How to replace a physiotherapist: artificial intelligence and the redistribution of expertise. Physiother Theor Pract 2022; 38: 2275-2283
- 2 McBee JC, Han DY, Liu L. et al. Assessing ChatGPTʼs Competency in Addressing Interdisciplinary Inquiries on Chatbot Uses in Sports Rehabilitation: Simulation Study. JMIR Med Educ 2024; 10: e51157
- 3 Sawamura S, Bito T, Ando T. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPTʼs responses to and references for clinical questions in physical therapy. J Phys Ther Sci 2024; 36: 234-239
- 4 Gürses ÖA, Özüdoğru A, Tuncay F. et al. The Role of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models in Personalized Rehabilitation Programs for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational Study. J Med Syst 2025; 49: 73
- 5 Hao J, Yao Z, Tang Y. et al. Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy: Evaluating ChatGPTʼs Role in Clinical Decision Support for Musculoskeletal Care. Ann Biomed Eng 2025; 53: 9-13
- 6 Rossettini G, Bargeri S, Cook C. et al. Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4o, Copilot, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity in advising on lumbosacral radicular pain against clinical practice guidelines: cross-sectional study. Front Digit Health 2025; 7: 1574287
- 7 Saglam S, Uludag V, Karaduman ZO. et al. Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence models GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 in clinical decision-making in sports surgery and physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2025; 25: 163
- 8 Griefahn A, Zalpour C, Luedtke K. Identifying the risk of exercises, recommended by an artificial intelligence for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Sci Rep 2024; 14: 14472
- 9 Granviken F, Meisingset I, Bach K. et al. Personalised decision support in the management of patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary physiotherapy care: a cluster randomised controlled trial (the SupportPrim project). Pain 2025; 166: 1167-1178
- 10 Ergezen Sahin G, Aras Bayram G, Sanchez Sierra A. et al. Effects of artificial intelligence based physiotherapy educational approach in developing clinical reasoning skills: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2025; 25: 1378
- 11 Ferrer-Peña R, Di-Bonaventura S, Pérez-González A. et al. Feasibility of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Large AI-Based Linguistic Models for Clinical Reasoning Training of Physical Therapy Students: Pilot Randomized Parallel-Group Study. JMIR Form Res 2025; 9: e66126
- 12 Hao J, Yao Z, Siu KC. Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy Education: Evaluating Clinical Reasoning Performance in Musculoskeletal Care Using ChatGPT. Musculoskeletal Care 2025; 23: e70177