Unilateral Versus Bilateral Spreader Grafts to Correct Cartilaginous Deviations in Structural Rhinoplasty: A Comparative Study on the Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes

Abstract

Introduction

Spreader grafts (SG) are used in rhinoplasty to correct cartilaginous deviations. There are no studies that compare aesthetic and functional outcomes of unilateral (USG) and bilateral SG (BSG).

Objectives and Hypotheses

Compare whether USG or BSG is better to correct cartilaginous deviations, if there are differences in dorsal width ratio (DWR) and in patient-perceived aesthetic and functional outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective study of 35 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty with USG or BSG. Deviation angle and DWR were calculated in frontal images before and 6 months postsurgery. Aesthetic and functional results were measured using nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) and visual analog scales (VAS).

Results

BSG significantly improved postoperative nasal deviation compared to USG (179.6 degrees vs. 172.9 degrees; p < 0.05). In minor preoperative deviations, there were no significant differences between BSG and USG (179.57 degrees vs. 177 degrees, respectively; p > 0.05). In major preoperative deviations, BSG provided better correction (179.62 degrees vs. 170.5 degrees; p < 0.05). DWR increased more with BSG compared to USG (0.12 vs. 0.04; p < 0.05). VAS and NOSE scores were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

BSG is more effective in correcting major cartilaginous deviations, while both USG and BSG effectively correct minor deviations. Though BSG increases DWR, this does not negatively impact patient-perceived aesthetic or functional outcomes.

Keywords

spreader grafts - functional septorhinoplasty - crooked nose - nasal deviation - dorsal width

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Oktober 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 19. November 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
20. November 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. November 2025

• References

• 1 Abu El-Wafa AM, Emara SS. Deviated nose: a systematic approach for correction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (08) e3078
• 2 Fuller JC, Levesque PA, Lindsay RW. Analysis of patient-perceived nasal appearance evaluations following functional septorhinoplasty with spreader graft placement. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2019; 21 (04) 305-311
• 3 Demir UL. A novel approach to crooked nose in rhinoplasty: asymmetric level osteotomy combined with unilateral spreader graft. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (05) 1512-1515
• 4 Thomas JR, Prendiville S. Overly wide cartilaginous middle vault. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12 (01) 107-110
• 5 Jang YJ, Wang JH, Lee BJ. Classification of the deviated nose and its treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134 (03) 311-315
• 6 Keyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B, Jafari Modrek M, Ramezanzade S, Sadeghi E. Spreader graft vs spreader flap in rhinoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of aesthetic and functional outcomes. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (06) 590-602
• 7 Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (02) 230-239
• 8 Gonçalves Ferreira M, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, Santos M. Ferreira-Ishida technique: spare roof technique B. Step-by-step guide to preserving the bony cap while dehumping. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (05) 901e-904e
• 9 Toriumi DM, Kovacevic M, Kosins AM. Structural preservation rhinoplasty: a hybrid approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (05) 1105-1120
• 10 Durán-Vega HC, Regalado-Briz A. Spreader graft easy and stable fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (03) e2168
• 11 Gökler O, Koçak İ. The combined use of spreader flap and asymmetric spreader graft in crooked nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (03) 1332-1338
• 12 Barone M, Cogliandro A, Salzillo R. et al. Role of spreader flaps in rhinoplasty: analysis of patients undergoing correction for severe septal deviation with long-term follow-up. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2019; 43 (04) 1006-1013
• 13 Kucuker I, Ozmen S. Extended spreader graft placement before lateral nasal osteotomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (04) 684-691
• 14 Reyneke JP, Ferretti C. Clinical assessment of the face. Semin Orthod 2012; 18 (03) 172-186
• 15 Chen YY, Kim SA, Jang YJ. Centering a deviated nose by caudal septal extension graft and unilaterally extended spreader grafts. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020; 129 (05) 448-455
• 16 Spiekermann C, Amler S, Rudack C, Stenner M. The visual analog scale as a comprehensible patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in septorhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018; 42 (03) 859-866
• 17 Gerecci D, Casanueva FJ, Mace JC. et al. Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) score outcomes after septorhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2019; 129 (04) 841-846
• 18 Floyd EM, Ho S, Patel P, Rosenfeld RM, Gordin E. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating functional rhinoplasty outcomes with the NOSE score. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 156 (05) 809-815
• 19 Elsayed AI, Elbahrawy A, Sorour S, Elsadek A, Fouad YA. The use of a unilateral curved spreader graft in the management of crooked nose deformity. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92 (02) 156-160
• 20 Sazgar AA, Razmara N, Razfar A, Sazgar AK, Amali A. Outcome of rhinoplasty in patients undergoing autospreader flaps without notable dorsal hump reduction: a clinical trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (10) 1688-1693
• 21 Ingels KJAO, Orhan KS, van Heerbeek N. The effect of spreader grafts on nasal dorsal width in patients with nasal valve insufficiency. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2008; 10 (05) 354-356