Int J Sports Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2785-7668
Training & Testing

Influence of Individual Traits on Measurement Differences in Percent Body Fat

Authors

  • Meghan K Magee

    1   Health Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, USA
  • Angela Miller

    2   Education, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA
  • Jennifer B Fields

    3   Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA
  • Andrew R Jagim

    4   Sports Medicine Research, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, USA
  • Brittanie Lockard

    5   Kinesiology, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, USA
  • Debra Stroiney

    6   Kinesiology, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA
  • Margaret T Jones

    7   Sports, Recreation, and Tourism Management, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to identify the influence of individual characteristics on differences in body fat percentage between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (change in body fat percentage) in 360 collegiate student-athletes. Body fat percentage was obtained from air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. A 2 (sex)×3 (Brozek body fat percentage, Siri body fat percentage, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body fat percentage) analysis of variance was used to evaluate the difference between the body fat percentages obtained from air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in men and women. The agreement between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was evaluated via Bland–Altman plot and linear regression. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the influence of sex, race, height, and body mass on the change in body fat percentages. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry yielded greater body fat percentages in both men (4.8±2.8; p < 0.001) and women (2.2±2.9; p < 0.001) compared to air displacement plethysmography measurements. Proportional and systematic biases were observed between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Race, height, and mass were significant predictors of the body fat percentage difference between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (R 2=0.445, p<0.001, and standard error of the estimate=2.527). The present study suggests that air displacement plethysmography underestimates body fat percentages when compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and this underestimation may not be the same for every athlete due to their individual characteristics.



Publication History

Received: 30 April 2025

Accepted after revision: 09 January 2026

Article published online:
12 March 2026

© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany