Endoscopy 2026; 58(04): 438-439
DOI: 10.1055/a-2797-6749
Letter to the editor

Reply to Luo

Authors

  • Markus Brand

    1   Medical Department II – Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  • Alexander Meining

    1   Medical Department II – Gastroenterology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

10.1055/a-2793-0676

We thank Dr Luo for the critical comments on our recent article evaluating a photometric capsule examination (PCE) to stratify patients with suspected nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) into emergency versus elective endoscopy [1].

We fully agree with the author that clinical scoring systems are essential for the assessment and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for identifying high-risk patients (Glasgow–Blatchford bleeding score [GBS] ≥12) [2] [3]. However, as the current European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline recommends early endoscopy for all patients with GBS >1, a large, clinically heterogeneous group (GBS 1–11) falls within this recommendation [4].

Hence, our study tested whether PCE is a useful method for further stratifying these patients with intermediate risk in whom endoscopy can potentially be delayed (48–96 hours). As our study was designed as a feasibility study, we agree with Dr Luo that the number of cases and the end points of our study were not designed to determine long-term outcomes (recurrent bleeding and mortality). As mentioned in our discussion, we agree that randomized multicenter studies are necessary to investigate a possible advantage of PCE in relation to these long-term results.



Publication History

Article published online:
20 March 2026

© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany