Semin Liver Dis 2009; 29(1): 040-052
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1192054
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Candidate Selection and Organ Allocation in Liver Transplantation

Muhammad F. Dawwas1 , Alexander E. Gimson1
  • 1Liver Transplant Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
23. Februar 2009 (online)

ABSTRACT

Optimal candidate selection and organ allocation should offer liver transplantation to those who are sufficiently sick to justify the procedure but not too sick to benefit from it, in an order determined by patients' projected survival benefit, matching organs of sufficiently good quality to the appropriate recipients. Significant steps have been made in recent years toward devising selection and allocation criteria based on more objective and evidence-based definitions of candidate disease severity, transplant futility, organ quality, and appropriate donor-recipient matching. However, much work remains to be done in the future.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Merion R M, Schaubel D E, Dykstra D M, Freeman R B, Port F K, Wolfe R A. The survival benefit of liver transplantation.  Am J Transplant. 2005;  5 307-313
  • 2 Freeman R B. Liver allocation: the intent-to-treat approach.  Transpl Int. 2006;  19 270-274
  • 3 Schaubel D E, Sima C S, Goodrich N P, Feng S, Merion R M. The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality.  Am J Transplant. 2008;  8 419-425
  • 4 Barshes N R, Hacker C S, Freeman Jr R B, Vierling J M, Goss J A. Justice, administrative law, and the transplant clinician: the ethical and legislative basis of a national policy on donor liver allocation.  J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2007;  23 200-230
  • 5 Dawwas M F, Gimson A E, Lewsey J D, Copley L P, van der Meulen J H. Survival after liver transplantation in the United Kingdom and Ireland compared with the United States.  Gut. 2007;  56 1606-1613
  • 6 Wiesner R H, Freeman R B, Mulligan D C. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: the impact of the MELD allocation policy.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127(5, Suppl 1) S261-S267
  • 7 Merion R M, Rush S H, Dykstra D M, Goodrich N, Freeman Jr R B, Wolfe R A. Predicted lifetimes for adult and pediatric split liver versus adult whole liver transplant recipients.  Am J Transplant. 2004;  4(11) 1792-1797
  • 8 Foster R, Zimmerman M, Trotter J F. Expanding donor options: marginal, living, and split donors.  Clin Liver Dis. 2007;  11 417-429
  • 9 Collett D, O'Neill J, Neuberger J. Splitting livers: balancing the gain and the pain.  Transpl Int. 2008;  21 218-222
  • 10 Freeman Jr R B. Survival benefit: quality versus quantity and trade-offs in developing new renal allocation systems.  Am J Transplant. 2007;  7(5) 1043-1046
  • 11 Schaubel D E, Guidinger M K, Goodrich N P, Roys E C, Sima C S, Merion R M. Liver transplant benefit: liver allocation models.  Am J Transplant. 2007;  7(suppl 2) 192
  • 12 Freeman R B. MELD and the quality of life.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11 134-136
  • 13 Freeman Jr R B. Mortality risk, behavior, and pediatric liver allocation.  Liver Transpl. 2006;  12 12-15
  • 14 Olsen J A. Theories of justice and their implications for priority setting in health care.  J Health Econ. 1997;  16 625-640
  • 15 Dixon J, Welch H G. Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.  Lancet. 1991;  337 891-894
  • 16 Neuberger J, Adams D, MacMaster P, Maidment A, Speed M. Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: survey of public and clinicians.  BMJ. 1998;  317 172-175
  • 17 Ubel P A, Jepson C, Baron J, Mohr T, McMorrow S, Asch D A. Allocation of transplantable organs: do people want to punish patients for causing their illness?.  Liver Transpl. 2001;  7 600-607
  • 18 Ratcliffe J. Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation.  Health Econ. 2000;  9 137-148
  • 19 Ho D. When good organs go to bad people.  Bioethics. 2008;  22 77-83
  • 20 Steinbrook R. Allocating livers–devising a fair system.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  336(6) 436-438
  • 21 Ubel P A, Caplan A L. Geographic favoritism in liver transplantation–unfortunate or unfair?.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  339(18) 1322-1325
  • 22 HHS/HRSA/HSB/DOT .2005 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report 1995–2004
  • 23 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network; final rule revision of comment period and effective dates—HRSA. Extension of comment period and delay of effective date for Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.  Fed Regist. 1998;  63 16296-16338
  • 24 Institute of Medicine .Analysis of waiting times. In: Committee on Organ Transplantation. Assessing Current Policies and the Potential Impact of the DHHS Final Rule. Washington, DC; National Academy Press 1999: 57-78
  • 25 Freeman R B. MELD: the holy grail of organ allocation?.  J Hepatol. 2005;  42 16-20
  • 26 Malinchoc M, Kamath P S, Gordon F D, Peine C J, Rank J, Borg P C. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.  Hepatology. 2000;  31 864-871
  • 27 Kamath P S, Wiesner R, Malinchoc M et al.. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.  Hepatology. 2001;  33 464-470
  • 28 Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R et al.. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 91-96
  • 29 Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Shusang V et al.. A systematic review of the performance of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) in the setting of liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl. 2006;  12 1049-1061
  • 30 Kanwal F, Dulai G S, Spiegel B M, Yee H F, Gralnek I M. A comparison of liver transplantation outcomes in the pre- vs. post-MELD eras.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;  21(2) 169-177
  • 31 Freeman Jr R B, Wiesner R H, Roberts J P, McDiarmid S, Dykstra D M, Merion R M. Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD.  Am J Transplant. 2004;  4(Suppl 9) 114-131
  • 32 UNOS policy management policies .Available at: http://www.unos.org/policiesandbylaws/policies.asp?resources=true Accessed October 10, 2008
  • 33 Neuberger J, James O. Guidelines for selection of patients for liver transplantation in the era of donor-organ shortage.  Lancet. 1999;  354 1636-1639
  • 34 Pugh R N, Murray-Lyon I M, Dawson J L, Pietroni M C, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices.  Br J Surg. 1973;  60 646-664
  • 35 Christensen E. Prognostic models including the Child-Pugh, MELD and Mayo risk scores—where are we and where should we go?.  J Hepatol. 2004;  41 344-350
  • 36 Durand F, Valla D. Assessment of the prognosis of cirrhosis: Child-Pugh versus MELD.  J Hepatol. 2005;  42(suppl 1) S100-S107
  • 37 Barber K M, Pioli S, Blackwell J E et al.. Development of a UK score for patients with end-stage liver disease.  Hepatology. 2007;  46 510A
  • 38 Heuman D M, Abou-Assi S G, Habib A et al.. Persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death.  Hepatology. 2004;  40 802-810
  • 39 Biggins S W, Rodriguez H J, Bacchetti P, Bass N M, Roberts J P, Terrault N A. Serum sodium predicts mortality in patients listed for liver transplantation.  Hepatology. 2005;  41 32-39
  • 40 Biggins S W, Kim W R, Terrault N A et al.. Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 1652-1660
  • 41 Ruf A E, Kremers W K, Chavez L L, Descalzi V I, Podesta L G, Villamil F G. Addition of serum sodium into the MELD score predicts waiting list mortality better than MELD alone.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11 336-343
  • 42 Londoño M C, Cárdenas A, Guevara M et al.. MELD score and serum sodium in the prediction of survival of patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation.  Gut. 2007;  56(9) 1283-1290
  • 43 Kim W R, Biggins S W, Kremers W K et al.. Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list.  N Engl J Med. 2008;  359 1018-1026
  • 44 Neuberger J, Gimson A, Davies M Liver Advisory Group et al. UK Blood and Transplant. Selection of patients for liver transplantation and allocation of donated livers in the UK.  Gut. 2008;  57 252-257
  • 45 Desschans B, Van Gelder F, Van Hees D et al.. Evolution in allocation rules for renal, hepatic, pancreatic and intestinal grafts.  Acta Chir Belg. 2008;  108 31-34
  • 46 Fontana M, Giostra E, Pilon N et al.. Liver transplantation: new organ allocation system in Switzerland.  Rev Med Suisse. 2008;  4 221-223
  • 47 Teixeira A C, Souza F F, Mota Gde A, Martinelli Ade L, Sankarankutty A K, Silva Ode C. Liver transplantation: expectation with MELD score for liver allocation in Brazil.  Acta Cir Bras. 2006;  21(Suppl 1) 12-14
  • 48 Freeman Jr R B. The model for end-stage liver disease comes of age.  Clin Liver Dis. 2007;  11 249-263
  • 49 de la Mata M, Cuende N, Huet J et al.. Model for end-stage liver disease score-based allocation of donors for liver transplantation: a Spanish multicenter experience.  Transplantation. 2006;  82 1429-1435
  • 50 Huo T I, Lin H C, Lee S D. Model for end-stage liver disease and organ allocation in liver transplantation: where are we and where should we go?.  J Chin Med Assoc. 2006;  69 193-198
  • 51 Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R et al.. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 693-699
  • 52 Freeman R B, Edwards E B, Harper A M. Waiting list removal rates among patients with chronic and malignant liver diseases.  Am J Transplant. 2006;  6(6) 1416-1421
  • 53 Freeman R B, Mithoefer A, Ruthazer R et al.. Optimizing staging for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis of the UNOS/OPTN database.  Liver Transpl. 2006;  12(10) 1504-1511
  • 54 Devlin J, O'Grady J. Indications for referral and assessment in adult liver transplantation: a clinical guideline. British Society of Gastroenterology.  Gut. 1999;  45(Suppl 6) VI1-VI22
  • 55 Yao F Y, Ferrell L, Bass N M et al.. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival.  Hepatology. 2001;  33 1394-1403
  • 56 Yao F Y, Bass N, Nikolai B et al.. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of survival according to the intention-to-treat principle and dropout from the waiting list.  Liver Transpl. 2002;  8 873-883
  • 57 Yao F Y, Xiao L, Bass N M, Kerlan R, Ascher N R, Roberts J P. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Validation of the UCSF expanded criteria based on preoperative imaging.  Am J Transplant. 2007;  7 2587-2596
  • 58 Bhoori S, Schiavo M, Russo A, Mazzaferro V. First-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: resection or transplantation?.  Transplant Proc. 2007;  39 2271-2273
  • 59 Freeman R B, Gish R G, Harper A et al.. Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception guidelines: results and recommendations from the MELD Exception Study Group and Conference (MESSAGE) for the approval of patients who need liver transplantation with diseases not considered by the standard MELD formula.  Liver Transpl. 2006;  12(suppl 3) S128-S136
  • 60 Freeman Jr R B. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) for liver allocation: a 5-year score card.  Hepatology. 2008;  47 1052-1057
  • 61 Ragni M V, Eghtesad B, Schlesinger K W, Dvorchik I, Fung J J. Pretransplant survival is shorter in HIV-positive than HIV-negative subjects with end-stage liver disease.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11 1425-1430
  • 62 Horslen S. Organ allocation for liver-intestine candidates.  Liver Transpl. 2004;  10(10 Suppl 2) S86-S89
  • 63 O'Grady J G, Alexander G J, Hayllar K M, Williams R. Early indicators of prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure.  Gastroenterology. 1989;  97 439-445
  • 64 Kremers W K, van IJperen M, Kim W R et al.. MELD score as a predictor of pretransplant and posttransplant survival in OPTN/UNOS status 1 patients.  Hepatology. 2004;  39 764-779
  • 65 Yantorno S E, Kremers W K, Ruf A E, Trentadue J J, Podesta L G, Villamil F G. MELD is superior to King's college and Clichy's criteria to assess prognosis in fulminant hepatic failure.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13 822-828
  • 66 Bernuau J, Goudeau A, Poynard T et al.. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in fulminant hepatitis B.  Hepatology. 1986;  6 648-651
  • 67 Bernal W, Wendon J. Liver transplantation in adults with acute liver failure.  J Hepatol. 2004;  40 192-197
  • 68 Sass D A, Shakil A O. Fulminant hepatic failure.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11 594-605
  • 69 Blei A T. Selection for acute liver failure: have we got it right?.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11(11 Suppl 2) S30-S34
  • 70 Jacob M, Lewsey J D, Sharpin C, Gimson A, Rela M, van der Meulen J H. Systematic review and validation of prognostic models in liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11 814-825
  • 71 Lewsey J D, Dawwas M, Copley L P, Gimson A, Van der Meulen J H. Developing a prognostic model for 90-day mortality after liver transplantation based on pretransplant recipient factors.  Transplantation. 2006;  82 898-907
  • 72 Ghobrial R M, Gornbein J, Steadman R et al.. Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients.  Ann Surg. 2002;  236 315-322
  • 73 Ioannou G N. Development and validation of a model predicting graft survival after liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl. 2006;  12 1594-1606
  • 74 Plotkin J S, Scott V L, Pinna A, Dobsch B P, DeWolf A M, Kang Y. Morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl Surg. 1996;  2 426-430
  • 75 Volk M L, Hernandez J C, Lok A S, Marrero J A. A modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting survival after liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13 1515-1520
  • 76 Yoo H Y, Thuluvath P J. The effect of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus on outcome of liver transplantation.  Transplantation. 2002;  74 1007-1012
  • 77 Thuluvath P J. When is diabetes mellitus a relative or absolute contraindication to liver transplantation?.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11(11 Suppl 2) S25-S29
  • 78 Pikul J, Sharpe M D, Lowndes R et al.. Degree of preoperative malnutrition is predictive of postoperative morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients.  Transplantation. 1994;  57 469-472
  • 79 Müller M J, Lautz H, Plogmann B, Burger M, Korber J, Schmidt F. Energy expenditure and substrate oxidation in patients with cirrhosis: the impact of cause, clinical staging and nutritional state.  Hepatology. 1992;  15 782-794
  • 80 Selberg O, Bottcher J, Tusch G, Pichlmayr R, Henkel E, Muller M. Identification of high- and low-risk patients before liver transplantation: a prospective cohort study of nutritional and metabolic parameters in 150 patients.  Hepatology. 1997;  25 652-657
  • 81 Bilbao I, Armadans L, Lazaro J L, Hidalgo E, Castells L, Margarit C. Predictive factors for early mortality following liver transplantation.  Clin Transplant. 2003;  17 401-411
  • 82 Dawwas M F, Gimson A E, Watson C J, Allison M E. Modeling the impact of recipient body mass index on post-liver transplant survival: a fractional polynomial approach.  Hepatology. 2008;  48(suppl) 554A
  • 83 Jacob M, Copley L P, Lewsey J D, Gimson A, Rela M, van der Meulen J HP. Functional status of patients before liver transplantation as a predictor of posttransplant mortality.  Transplantation. 2005;  80 52-57
  • 84 Yerdel M A, Gunson B, Mirza D et al.. Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome.  Transplantation. 2000;  69 1873-1881
  • 85 Thuluvath P J, Yoo H Y, Thompson R E. A model to predict survival at one month, one year and five years after liver transplantation based on pretransplant clinical characteristics.  Liver Transpl. 2003;  9 527-532
  • 86 Desai N M, Mange K C, Crawford M D et al.. Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: utility of the model for end stage liver disease.  Transplantation. 2004;  77 99-106
  • 87 Dawwas M F, Lewsey J D, Watson C J, Gimson A E. The impact of serum potassium concentration on mortality after liver transplantation: a cohort multicenter study.  Transplantation. 2008;  , In press
  • 88 Londono M C, Guevara M, Rimola A et al.. Hyponatremia impairs early posttransplantation outcome in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 1135-1143
  • 89 Dawwas M F, Lewsey J D, Neuberger J M, Gimson A E. The impact of serum sodium concentration on mortality after liver transplantation: a cohort multicenter study.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13 1115-1124
  • 90 Yerdel M A, Gunson B, Mirza D et al.. Portal vein thrombosis in adults undergoing liver transplantation: risk factors, screening, management, and outcome.  Transplantation. 2000;  69 1873-1881
  • 91 Selvaggi G, Weppler D, Nishida S et al.. Ten-year experience in porto-caval hemitransposition for liver transplantation in the presence of portal vein thrombosis.  Am J Transplant. 2007;  7 454-460
  • 92 Bathgate A J. UK Liver Transplant Units . Recommendations for alcohol-related liver disease.  Lancet. 2006;  367 2045-2046
  • 93 Murray K F, Carithers Jr R L. AASLD . AASLD practice guidelines: evaluation of the patient for liver transplantation.  Hepatology. 2005;  41 1407-1432
  • 94 DiMartini A, Day N, Dew M A et al.. Alcohol consumption patterns and predictors of use following liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease.  Liver Transpl. 2006;  12(5) 813-820
  • 95 Dew M A, DiMartini A F, Steel J et al.. Meta-analysis of risk for relapse to substance use after transplantation of the liver or other solid organs.  Liver Transpl. 2008;  14(2) 159-172
  • 96 Kelly M, Chick J, Gribble R et al.. Predictors of relapse to harmful alcohol after orthotopic liver transplantation.  Alcohol Alcohol. 2006;  41 278-283
  • 97 De Gottardi A, Spahr L, Gelez P et al.. A simple score for predicting alcohol relapse after liver transplantation: results from 387 patients over 15 years.  Arch Intern Med. 2007;  167 1183-1188
  • 98 Leithead J A, Ferguson J W, Hayes P C. Smoking-related morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl. 2008;  14 1159-1164
  • 99 Koch M, Banys P. Methadone is a medication, not an addiction.  Liver Transpl. 2002;  8 783-786
  • 100 Charpentier K P, Mavanur A. Removing patients from the liver transplant wait list: A survey of US liver transplant programs.  Liver Transpl. 2008;  14 303-307
  • 101 Trotter J F, Brimhall B, Arjal R, Phillips C. Specific laboratory methodologies achieve higher model for endstage liver disease (MELD) scores for patients listed for liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl. 2004;  10 995-1000
  • 102 Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Kerry A et al.. Different methods of creatinine measurement significantly affect MELD scores.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13(4) 523-529
  • 103 Cholongitas E, Marelli L, Kerry A et al.. Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores—a systematic bias.  Am J Transplant. 2007;  7(3) 685-692
  • 104 Sherman D S, Fish D N, Teitelbaum I. Assessing renal function in cirrhotic patients: problems and pitfalls.  Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;  41 269-278
  • 105 Ravaioli M, Masetti M, Ridolfi L et al.. Laboratory test variability and model for end-stage liver disease score calculation: effect on liver allocation and proposal for adjustment.  Transplantation. 2007;  83(7) 919-924
  • 106 Trotter J F, Olson J, Lefkowitz J, Smith A D, Arjal R, Kenison J. Changes in international normalized ratio (INR) and model for endstage liver disease (MELD) based on selection of clinical laboratory.  Am J Transplant. 2007;  7(6) 1624-1628
  • 107 Tripodi A, Chantarangkul V, Primignani M et al.. The international normalized ratio calibrated for cirrhosis (INR(liver)) normalizes prothrombin time results for model for end-stage liver disease calculation.  Hepatology. 2007;  46(2) 520-527
  • 108 Bellest L, Eschwège V, Poupon R, Chazouillères O, Robert A. A modified international normalized ratio as an effective way of prothrombin time standardization in hepatology.  Hepatology. 2007;  46(2) 528-534
  • 109 Tripodi A, Chantarangkul V, Mannucci P M. The international normalized ratio to prioritize patients for liver transplantation: problems and possible solutions.  J Thromb Haemost. 2008;  6 243-248
  • 110 Saab S, Ibrahim A B, Shpaner A et al.. MELD fails to measure quality of life in liver transplant candidates.  Liver Transpl. 2005;  11 218-223
  • 111 Yoo H Y, Edwin D, Thuluvath P J. Relationship of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scale to hepatic encephalopathy, neuropsychometric testing, and ascites.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 1395-1399
  • 112 Huo T I, Lin H C, Wu J C et al.. Different model for end-stage liver disease score block distributions may have a variable ability for outcome prediction.  Transplantation. 2005;  80(10) 1414-1418
  • 113 Udayakumar N, Subramaniam K, Umashankar L, Verghese J, Jayanthi V. Predictors of mortality in hepatic encephalopathy in acute and chronic liver disease: a preliminary observation.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;  41 922-926
  • 114 Yu J W, Wang G Q, Li S C. Prediction of the prognosis in patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis using the MELD scoring system.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  21 1519-1524
  • 115 Sharma P, Schaubel D E, Sima C S, Merion R M, Lok A S. Re-weighting the model for end-stage liver disease score components.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  135 1575-1581
  • 116 Ripoll C, Bañares R, Rincón D et al.. Influence of hepatic venous pressure gradient on the prediction of survival of patients with cirrhosis in the MELD era.  Hepatology. 2005;  42(4) 793-801
  • 117 Said A, Williams J, Holden J et al.. Model for end stage liver disease score predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of liver disease.  J Hepatol. 2004;  40(6) 897-903
  • 118 Luca A, Angermayr B, Bertolini G et al.. An integrated MELD model including serum sodium and age improves the prediction of early mortality in patients with cirrhosis.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13 1174-1180
  • 119 Stewart C A, Malinchoc M, Kim W R, Kamath P S. Hepatic encephalopathy as a predictor of survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13(10) 1366-1371
  • 120 Heuman D M, Mihas A A, Habib A et al.. MELD-XI: a rational approach to “sickest first” liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients requiring anticoagulant therapy.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13(1) 30-37
  • 121 Feng S, Goodrich N P, Bragg-Gresham J L et al.. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.  Am J Transplant. 2006;  6 783-790
  • 122 Dawwas M F, Collett D, Barber K, Watson C J, Neuberger J M. Developing a liver transplantation donor risk index in a national registry.  Hepatology. 2007;  46(suppl 1) 235A
  • 123 Dawwas M F, Collett D, Barber K, Watson C J, Neuberger J N, Gimson A E. Should donor organs and recipients be matched in liver transplantation? An analysis of the United Kingdom and Ireland Liver Transplant Database.  Hepatology. 2007;  46(suppl 1) 516A
  • 124 Ravaioli M, Grazi G L, Ercolani G et al.. Liver allocation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a European Center policy in the pre-MELD era.  Transplantation. 2006;  81 525-530
  • 125 Segev D L, Maley W R, Simpkins C E et al.. Minimizing risk associated with elderly liver donors by matching to preferred recipients.  Hepatology. 2007;  46 1907-1918
  • 126 Dawwas M F, Allison M E, Watson C J, Gimson A E. Diabetic donor organs and survival among HCV + liver transplant recipients: a further piece in the jigsaw.  Hepatology. 2008;  48(suppl) 19A
  • 127 Dawwas M F, Watson C J, Gimson A E. Liver transplant allocation to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.  Hepatology. 2008;  48(suppl) 104A
  • 128 Amin M G, Wolf M P, Tenbrook M A et al.. The underutilization of expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis.  Liver Transpl. 2004;  10 1468-1475
  • 129 Haydon G H, Hiltunen Y, Lucey M R et al.. Self-organizing maps can determine outcome and match recipients and donors at orthotopic liver transplantation.  Transplantation. 2005;  79 213-218
  • 130 Cucchetti A, Vivarelli M, Heaton N D et al.. Artificial neural network is superior to MELD in predicting mortality of patients with end-stage liver disease.  Gut. 2007;  56 253-258
  • 131 Shechter S M, Bryce C L, Alagoz O et al.. A clinically based discrete-event simulation of end-stage liver disease and the organ allocation process.  Med Decis Making. 2005;  25 199-209
  • 132 Thompson D, Waisanen L, Wolfe R, Merion R M, McCullough K, Rodgers A. Simulating the allocation of organs for transplantation.  Health Care Manage Sci. 2004;  7 331-338

Alexander E GimsonM.D. 

Liver Transplant Unit, Box 210, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road

Cambridge CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom

eMail: alexander.gimson@addenbrookes.nhs.uk

    >