Endoscopy 2009; 41(8): 679-683
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214979
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms

H.  Isomoto1 , 2 , H.  Nishiyama2 , N.  Yamaguchi1 , 2 , E.  Fukuda2 , H.  Ishii2 , K.  Ikeda2 , K.  Ohnita2 , K.  Nakao2 , S.  Kohno1 , S.  Shikuwa3
  • 1Department of Endoscopy, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
  • 3Sankokai Miyazaki Hospital, Isahaya, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

submitted28 December 2008

accepted after revision4 May 2009

Publication Date:
10 August 2009 (online)

Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) permits removal of colorectal epithelial neoplasms en bloc, but a substantial risk of procedure-related perforation has been reported. We sought to unravel the clinicopathological factors associated with the clinical outcomes of ESD for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in a large series.

Patients and methods: ESD was done in 278 patients with 292 colorectal tumors that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The criteria for ESD were: lesion greater than 20 mm in size, lesion with fibrotic scarring, locally residual colorectal lesion, or invasive carcinoma with slight submucosal penetration. Resection was assessed as en bloc or piecemeal, complete (en bloc with tumor-free lateral and basal margins) or incomplete. Complications including perforation and bleeding were assessed, and factors related to each were analyzed using logistic regression. Patients underwent multiple follow-up endoscopic examinations (mean 4.6; median 4; range 2 – 9; total number 1010).

Results: En bloc resection was achieved in 90.1 % of lesions (263/292) and resection was deemed to be complete in 233 (79.8 %). Right-side colonic location and the finding of fibrosis were the significant contributors to incomplete resection. Perforation was seen in 24 cases (8.2 %), and was associated with large tumor size and the presence of fibrosis. When the contributive factors for each were combined, the risks of incomplete resection and perforation were substantially increased.

Conclusion: The present study provides useful information for predicting risks for incomplete resection and complication in colorectal ESD.

References

  • 1 Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H. et al . A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 560-563
  • 2 Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer.  Gut. 2001;  48 225-259
  • 3 Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study.  Gut. 2009;  58 331-336
  • 4 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal epithelial neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 493-497
  • 5 Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 100-107
  • 6 Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 418-422
  • 7 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N. et al . Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 678-683
  • 8 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T. et al . Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections [with video].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 966-973
  • 9 Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection.  J Gastroenterol. 2008;  43 641-651
  • 10 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 (6 Suppl) S3-S43
  • 11 Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: technical feasibility, operation time and complications from a large consecutive series.  Dig Endosc. 2005;  17 54-58
  • 12  . General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Part I. Clinical classification. Japanese Research Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.  Jpn J Surg. 1983;  13 557-573
  • 13 Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y. et al . The Vienna Classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  47 251-255
  • 14 Fujishiro M. Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 4289-4295
  • 15 Kudo S E, Kashida H. Flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 (7 Suppl 1) S33-S36

H. IsomotoMD 

Department of Endoscopy
Nagasaki University Hospital

1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501
Japan

Fax: +81-95-8497285

Email: hajimei2002@yahoo.co.jp

    >