Int J Sports Med 2010; 31(2): 89-94
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1233466
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Anaerobic Work Capacity Derived from Isokinetic and Isoinertial Cycling

M. S. F. Wiedemann1 , 3 , L. Bosquet2 , 3
  • 1Technical University of Munich, Faculty of Sports Science, Munich, Germany
  • 2Université de Poitiers, Faculté des sciences du sport, Poitiers, France
  • 3Université de Montréal, Département de kinésiologie, Montréal, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision June 16, 2009

Publication Date:
17 December 2009 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare Anaerobic Work Capacity (AWC) measured on an isoinertial or an isokinetic bicycle ergometer. Twelve male participants completed two randomly ordered exercise testing sessions including a torque-velocity test followed by a 30-s all-out test on an isokinetic ergometer, or a force-velocity test followed by a Wingate Anaerobic Test on an isoinertial ergometer. Optimal load measured during the force-velocity test on the isoinertial ergometer was 1.13±0.11 N.kg−1. Optimal cadence measured during the torque-velocity test on the isokinetic ergometer was 107±13 rpm. Although Ppeak measures were significantly correlated (r=0.77), we found a large difference between them (effect size=2.85) together with wide limits of agreement (bias±95%LOA=24±12%). The same observation was made with Pmean, but with a smaller magnitude of difference (bias±95%LOA=4.2±12%; effect size=0.51; r=0.73). This lack of agreement led us to the conclusion that AWC measures obtained during 30-s all-out tests performed on an isoinertial or an isokinetic bicycle ergometer are not necessarily similar and cannot be used interchangeably.

References

  • 1 Abbiss CR, Quod MJ, Levin G, Martin DT, Laursen PB. Accuracy of the Velotron ergometer and SRM power meter.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 107-112
  • 2 Ayalon A, Inbar O, Bar-Or O. Relationships among measurements of explosive strength and anaerobic power. In: Nelson RC, Morehouse CA (eds), International Series on Sport Sciences. Baltimore: University Press 1974: 572-577
  • 3 Bar-Or O. The Wingate Anaerobic Test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.  Sports Med. 1987;  4 381-394
  • 4 Baron R, Bachl N, Petschnig R. Measurement of maximal power output in isokinetic and non-isokinetic cycling. A comparison of two methods.  Int J Sports Med. 1999;  20 532-537
  • 5 Bentley DJ, McNaughton LR, Thompson D, Vleck VE, Batterham AM. Peak power output, the lactate threshold, and time trial performance in cyclists.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;  33 2077-2081
  • 6 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
  • 7 Coggan AR, Costill DL. Biological and technological variability of three anaerobic ergometer tests.  Int J Sports Med. 1984;  5 142-145
  • 8 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988: 567
  • 9 Coleman DA, Wiles JD, Nunn M, Smith MF. Reliability of sprint test indices in well-trained cyclists.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 383-387
  • 10 Coleman SG, Hale T. The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test.  Can J Appl Physiol. 1998;  23 409-417
  • 11 Craig NP, Norton KI. Characteristics of track cycling.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 457-468
  • 12 Dotan R. The Wingate Anaerobic Test's past and future and the compatibility of mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle-ergometers.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;  98 113-116
  • 13 Green S. Measurement of anaerobic work capacities in humans.  Sports Med. 1995;  19 32-42
  • 14 Hautier CA, Linossier MT, Belli A, Lacour JR, Arsac LM. Optimal velocity for maximal power production in non-isokinetic cycling is related to muscle fibre type composition.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1996;  74 114-118
  • 15 Hoffman JR, Cooper J, Wendell M, Im J, Kang J. Effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate on power performance and indices of muscle damage and stress during high intensity training.  J Strength Cond Res. 2004;  18 747-752
  • 16 Inbar O, Bar-Or O, Skinner JS. The Wingate Anaerobic Test.  Champaign: Human Kinetics;. 1996;  110
  • 17 Jones NL, McCartney N, Graham T. Muscle performance and metabolism in maximal isokinetic cycling at slow and fast speeds.  J Appl Physiol. 1985;  59 132-136
  • 18 Lakomy HK. Measurement of work and power output using friction-loaded cycle ergometers.  Ergonomics. 1986;  29 509-517
  • 19 MacIntosh BR, MacEachern P. Paced effort and all-out 30-s power tests.  Int J Sports Med. 1997;  18 594-599
  • 20 MacIntosh BR, Rishaug P, Svedahl K. Assessment of peak power and short-term work capacity.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;  88 572-579
  • 21 MacIntosh BR, Svedahl K, Kim M. Fatigue and optimal conditions for short-term work capacity.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;  92 369-375
  • 22 Martin JC, Diedrich D, Coyle EF. Time course of learning to produce maximum cycling power.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 485-487
  • 23 Martin JC, Spirduso WW. Determinants of maximal cycling power: crank length, pedaling rate and pedal speed.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;  84 413-418
  • 24 Maxwell BF, Withers RT, Ilsley AH, Wakim MJ, Woods GF, Day L. Dynamic calibration of mechanically, air- and electromagnetically braked cycle ergometers.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;  78 346-352
  • 25 McCartney N, Obminski G, Heigenhauser GJ. Torque-velocity relationship in isokinetic cycling exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1985;  58 1459-1462
  • 26 Micklewright D, Alkhatib A, Beneke R. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;  96 748-751
  • 27 Minahan C, Chia M, Inbar O. Does power indicate capacity? 30-s Wingate anaerobic test vs. maximal accumulated O2 deficit.  Int J Sports Med. 2007;  28 836-843
  • 28 Philips M, Svedahl K, MacIntosh BR. Isokinetic Wingate test scores for adolescent Aathletes.  (Abstract). Can J Appl Physiol. 2004;  29 S72
  • 29 Reiser  2nd  RF, Broker JP, Peterson ML. Inertial effects on mechanically braked Wingate power calculations.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 1660-1664
  • 30 Sargeant AJ, Hoinville E, Young A. Maximum leg force and power output during short-term dynamic exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1981;  51 1175-1182
  • 31 Stolen T, Chamari K, Castagna C, Wisloff U. Physiology of soccer: an update.  Sports Med. 2005;  35 501-536
  • 32 Vandewalle H, Peres G, Heller J, Monod H. All out anaerobic capacity tests on cycle ergometers. A comparative study on men and women.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1985;  54 222-229
  • 33 Vandewalle H, Peres G, Monod H. Standard anaerobic exercise tests.  Sports Med. 1987;  4 268-289
  • 34 Watt KK, Hopkins WG, Snow RJ. Reliability of performance in repeated sprint cycling tests.  J Sci Med Sport. 2002;  5 354-361
  • 35 Williams CA, Doust JH, Hammond A. Power output and VO2 responses during 30 s maximal isokinetic cycle sprints at different cadences in comparison to the Wingate test.  Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2006;  14 327-333
  • 36 Williams CA, Hammond A, Doust JH. Short term power output of females during isokinetic cycling.  Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2003;  11 123-131

Correspondence

Dr. L. Bosquet

Université de Poitiers

Faculté des sciences du sport

4 allée Jean Monnet

86000 Poitiers

France

Phone: +33/(0)/549 454 115

Fax: +33/(0)/549 453 396

Email: laurent.bosquet@gmail.com

    >