Is there a preventive value in non-invasive cardiac imaging?

Summary

History: A 64-year old male marathon runner noted during training an asymptomatic sudden increase in heart rate as recorded on his heart rate monitor. But this was not verifiable on subsequent Holter-ECG monitoring. However, treadmill exercise testing revealed unexpected signs of ischemia, which required further diagnostic tests.

Investigations: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) demonstrated advanced coronary atherosclerosis, with suspected morphologically significant stenosis after contrast injection. Because of the absence of angina, a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was done which gave no evidence of ischemia, and there was no late enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging. In view of these findings invasive coronary angiography was not performed.

Treatment and course: The patient received aggressive risk modifying therapy. He is still running regularly event-free after nine months.

Conclusion: This case shows that the use of modern non-invasive cardiovascular imaging can have an impact in preventive clinical decision making.

References

• 1 Berman D S, Wong N D, Gransar H. et al . Relationship between stress-induced myocardial ischemia and atherosclerosis measured by coronary calcium tomography.  JACC. 2004;  44 923-930
• 2 Boden W E, O’Rourke R A, Teo K K. et al . The evolving pattern of symptomatic coronary artery disease in the United States and Canada: baseline characteristics of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial.  Am J Cardiol. 2007;  99 208-212
• 3 Boden W E, O’Rourke R A, Teo K K. et al, for the COURAGE Trial Research Group . Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease.  NEJM. 2007;  356 1503-1516
• 4 Breuckmann F, Möhlenkamp S, Nassenstein K. et al . Prevalence, pattern, and prognostic relevance of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement in marathon runners.  Radiology. 2009;  251 (1) 50-57
• 5 Budoff M J, Achenbach S, Blumenthal R S. et al . Assessment of CAD by Cardiac CT: A scientific statement from the AHA committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and committee on cardiac imaging, council on clinical cardiology.  Circulation. 2006;  114 1761-1791
• 6 Budoff M J, Dowe D, Jollis J G. et al . Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known CAD. Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) Trial.  JACC. 2008;  52 1724-1732
• 7 Detrano R, Guerci A D, Carr J J. et al . Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups.  N Engl J Med. 2008;  358 1336-1345
• 8 Erbel R, Möhlenkamp S, Moebus S. et al .Signs of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis measured as coronary artery calcification improve risk prediction of hard events beyond traditional risk factors in an unselected general population: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study five-year outcome data. ACC Annual Meeting 2009. Late Breaking Clinical Trial. http://acc09.acc.org/Pages/default.aspx – Presenters Only – Program Planner – Advanced Search – Presentation Number: 404 – 410. 
• 9 Gohlke H, Schuler G. Primärprävention kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen.  Z Kardiol. 2005;  94 (Suppl. 3) 1-115
• 10 Greenland P, Bonow R O, Brundage B H. et al . ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on CAC scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain. A report of the ACC Foundation clinical expert consensus task force (ACCF/AHA writing committee to update the 2000 expert consensus document on EBCT). Developed in collaboration with the SAIP and the SCCT.  Circulation. 2007;  115 403-426
• 11 Hachamovitch R, Hayes S W, Friedman J D, Cohen I, Berman D S. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior CAD undergoing stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.  Circulation. 2003;  107 2900-2907
• 12 Lauer M S. Elements of danger – The case of medical imaging.  NEJM. 2009;  361 841-843
• 13 Miller J M, Rochitte C E, Dewey M. et al . Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-Row CT.  NEJM. 2008;  359 2324-2336
• 14 Möhlenkamp S, Böse D, Mahabadi A A, Heusch G, Erbel R. On the paradox of exercise: coronary atherosclerosis in an apparently healthy marathon runner.  Nature Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;  4 (7) 396-401
• 15 Möhlenkamp S, Lehmann N, Breuckmann F. et al . Running: the risk of coronary events – prevalence and prognostic relevance of coronary atherosclerosis in marathon runners.  Eur Heart J. 2008;  29 (15) 1903-1910
• 16 Oudkerk M, Stillman A E, Halliburton S S. et al . Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI).  Eur Radiol. 2008;  18 (12) 2785-2807
• 17 Schmermund A, Bailey K R, Rumberger J A. et al . An algorithm for noninvasive identification of angiographic three-vessel and/or left main CAD in symptomatic patients on the basis of cardiac risk and EBCT calcium scores.  JACC. 1999;  33 44-52