Download PDF
neuroreha 2009; 1(1): 28-32
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1242445
Schwerpunkt Repetition

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Komplexes aufgabenspezifisches repetitives Training bei zentralmotorischen Störungen

Caroline Renner, Horst Hummelsheim
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 November 2009 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Erlernen von Fähigkeiten verändert die Funktion des Gehirns – dies gilt sowohl für Sportler und Pianisten als auch für den Patienten nach Hirninfarkt während eines intensiven, sich steigernden, repetitiven sensomotorischen Trainings der paretischen Extremitäten. Der vorliegende Artikel gibt einen Einblick in die Grundlagen und die praktische Durchführung des repetitiven Trainings. Entscheidend ist, dass der Patient das repetitive Training aktiv mehrmals täglich durchführt und sich die Anforderungen des Trainings und/oder die Komplexität der Aufgabe parallel zur Verbesserung der motorischen Leistungen steigern: Der Patient übt stets an seiner individuellen Leistungsgrenze. Zudem darf die Auswahl der Trainingsinhalte keinesfalls stereotyp erfolgen, sondern Therapeuten sollten diese an die individuellen Funktionsstörungen bzw. die Bedürfnisse des Patienten anpassen.

Literatur

  • 01 Asanuma H, Keller A. Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning in mammals.  Neuroreport. 1991;  2 217-224
    Google Scholar
  • 02 Asanuma H, Pavlides C. Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals.  Neuroreport. 1997;  8 i-vi
    Google Scholar
  • 03 Barbay S, Plautz E J, Friel K M. et al. . Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of delayed training following a small ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys .  Exp Brain Res. 2006;  169(1) 106-116
    Google Scholar
  • 04 Brogardh C, Sjölund B H. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use.  Clinical Rehabil. 2006;  20 218-227
    Google Scholar
  • 05 Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P. et al. . Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.  J. Neurol. Sci.. 1995;  130 59-68
    Google Scholar
  • 06 Bütefisch C M, Davis B C, Wise S P. et al. . Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;  97 3661-3665
    Google Scholar
  • 07 Classen J, Liepert J, Wise S P. et al. . Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice.  J Neurophysiol. 1998;  79(2) 1117-1123
    Google Scholar
  • 08 Dromerick A W, Lang C E, Birkenmeier R L. Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS). A single-center RCT.  Neurology. 2009;  73(3) 195-201
    Google Scholar
  • 09 Feys H, Weerdt W, Selz B. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke.  Stroke. 1998;  29 785-792
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Feys H, Weerdt W, Werbeke G. et al. . Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial.  Stroke. 2004;  35 924-929
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 French B, Thomas L H, Leathley M J. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Art. No.: CD006073. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006073.pub2 2007 Issue 4
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Gauthier L V, Taub E, Perkins C. et al. . Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke.  Stroke. 2008;  39(5) 1520-1525
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hauptmann B, Hummelsheim M. Facilitation of motor evoked potentials in hand extensor muscles of stroke patients: correlation to the level of voluntary contraction.  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;  101(5) 387-394
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke M T. et al. . Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients.  Stroke. 1995;  26 976-981
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Hesse S, Konrad M, Uhlenbrock D. Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects. 1999; 80: 421–427.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil.. 1991;  80 421-427
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hummelsheim M, Maier-Loth M L, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients.  Scand J Rehabil Med. . 1997;  29(1) 3-10
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kaelin-Lang A, Sawaki L, Cohen L G. Role of voluntary drive in encoding an elementary motor memory.  J Neurophysiol. 2005;  93(2) 1099-1103
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Krakauer J W. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.  Curr Opin Neurol.. 2006;  19(1): 84-90
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kwakkel G, Wagenaar R, Twisk J. et al. . Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle cerebral artery stroke: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 1999;  354 191-196
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kwakkel G, Kollen B J, Wagenaar R C. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;  72(4) 473-479
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang H R. et al. . Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans.  Stroke. 2000;  31(6) 1210-1216
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lindberg P, G , Schmitz C. et al. . Use-dependent up- and down-regulation of sensorimotor brain circuits in stroke patients.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;  21(4) 315-326
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N. et al. . Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive.  Brain. 2003;  126(Pt 4) 86-872
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Merzenich M M, Nelson R J, Stryker M P. et al. . Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys.  J Comp Neurol. 1984;  224 591-605
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Miltner W H, Bauder H, Sommer M. et al. . Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication.  Stroke. 1999;  30 586-592
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Moore J. Neuroanatomical considerations relating to the recovery of function following brain injury. In: Bach-y-Rita P (ed.) Recovery of function: theoretical considerations for brain injury rehabilitation Huber Verlag; Bern 1980: 9-91
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Nudo R J, Milliken G W. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys.  J Neurophysiol. 1996;  75 2144-2149
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Nudo R J, Milliken G W, Merzenich M M. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys.  J Neurosci. 1996;  16(2) 785-807
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Page S J, Levine P, Leonard A. Modified contraint induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;  19 27-32
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Platz T, Winter T, Muller N. et al. . Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.  Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2001;  82 961-968
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sterr A, Elbert T, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch.  Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2002;  83 1374-1377
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sirtori V, Gatti R, Corbetta D. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in stroke patients (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews CD004433. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004433 2003 Issue 4
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Taub E, Miller N E, Novack T A. et al. . Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;  74 347-354
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Winstein C J, Rose D K, Tan S M. et al. . A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  85(4) 620-628
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Woldag H, Waldmann G, Heuschkel G. et al. . Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients?.  Clin Rehabil. 2003;  17(7) 723-730
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Woldag H, Stupka K, Hummelsheim H. The repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements with shaping is beneficial for motor improvement in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. submitted. 
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Wolf S L, Winstein C J, Miller J P. et al. . Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial.  Lancet Neurol. 2008;  7 33-40
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Woodlee M T, Schallert T. The interplay between behaviour and neurodegeneration in rat models of Parkinson’s disease and stroke.  Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2004;  22 153-161
    Google Scholar

Dr. med. Caroline I. E.  RennerOberärztin, Fachärztin für Neurologie
Prof. Dr. med. habil. Horst  Hummelsheimärztlicher Direktor, Professor für Neurologische Rehabilitation an der Universität Leipzig

Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Leipzig

Universität Leipzig

Muldentalweg 1

04828 Bennewitz

Phone: 03425/888197

Fax: 03425/888190

Email: renner@sachsenklinik.de

      >