Endoscopy 2010; 42(5): 395-399
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243860
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Transcylindrical cholecystectomy under local anesthesia plus sedation. A pilot study

E.  J.  Grau-Talens1 , J.  H.  Cattáneo1 , R.  Giraldo1 , P.  G.  Mangione-Castro1 , M.  Giner2
  • 1Department of Surgery, Hospital Siberia-Serena, Talarrubias (Badajoz), Spain
  • 2Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 14 August 2009

accepted after revision 18 November 2009

Publication Date:
25 January 2010 (online)

Background and study aim: The practice of laparoscopic cholecystectomy under local anesthesia is almost anecdotal. For 15 years we have been using a “transcylindrical cholecystectomy” technique for the treatment of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and choledocholithiasis. The present study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of transcylindrical cholecystectomy under local anesthesia through a prospective and longitudinal efficacy study.

Patients and methods: Transcylindrical cholecystectomy is performed gas-free through a single cylinder 3.8 cm in diameter and 10.0 cm in length. In 60 patients suffering from cholelithiasis (mean age 52.6 years, range 31 – 83 years; men/women 13/47; body mass index 29.6 kg/m2, range 24 – 44 kg/m2), transcylindrical cholecystectomy was planned and started under local anesthesia. Patients were reviewed 5 days after surgery; pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and procedure satisfaction was assessed following completion of a patient questionnaire.

Results: Surgery was satisfactorily completed through the cylinder in all patients. In 13 patients (21.7 %) local anesthesia was converted to general anesthesia due to technical difficulties in 11 patients (two related to patient body volume), respiratory depression in one patient, and poor patient tolerance in one patient. Postoperative complications were: wound infection (n = 1, 1.7 %), wound seromas (n = 2, 3.3 %), and nausea (n = 3, 5 %). After surgery, only three patients experienced pain at rest with VAS values of 0.5, 1.5, and 2.9, respectively. All but two patients were discharged from hospital on the day of surgery, and all patients were satisfied with the procedure.

Conclusions: Transcylindrical cholecystectomy under local anesthesia is a feasible technique that builds on the benefits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and confers an economic advantage and improved safety for patients.

References

  • 1 Keus F, deJong J, Gooszen H G. et al . Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;  Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006229. DOI: 10.1002/14 651 858.CD006229
  • 2 Hamad M A, El-Khattary O A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia with nitrous oxide pneumoperitoneum: a feasibility study.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 1426-1428
  • 3 Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia: a pilot study.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 580-582
  • 4 Van Zundert A AJ, Stultiens G, Jakimowicz J J. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under segmental thoracic spinal anaesthesia: a feasibility study.  Br J Anaesth. 2007;  98 682-686
  • 5 Grau-Talens E J, García-Olives F, Rupérez-Arribas M P. Transcylindrical cholecystectomy: new technique for minimally invasive cholecystectomy.  World J Surg. 1998;  22 453-458
  • 6 Ramsay M, Savege T, Simpson B R. et al . Controlled sedation with alphaxolone-alphadolone.  BMJ. 1974;  2 656-659
  • 7 LeBlanc J M, Dasta J F, Kane-Gill S L. Role of the bispectral index in sedation monitoring in the ICU.  Ann Pharmacother. 2006;  40 490-500
  • 8 Chung F. Recovery pattern and home-readiness after ambulatory surgery.  Anesth Analg. 1995;  80 896-902
  • 9 Keus F, deJong J, Gooszen H G. et al . Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006;  Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006231. DOI: 10.1002/14 651 858.CD006231
  • 10 Keus F, deJonge T, Gooszen H G. et al . Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings.  Trials. 2009;  10 80
  • 11 El-Minawi M F, Wahbi O, El-Bagouri I S. et al . Physiologic changes during CO2 and N2O pneumoperitoneum in diagnostic laparoscopy: a comparative study.  J Reprod Med. 1981;  26 338-346
  • 12 Nordin P, Zetterstrom H, Gunnarsson U. et al . Local, regional, or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial.  Lancet. 2003;  362 853-857
  • 13 O’Dwyer P J, Serpeli M G, Millar K. et al . Local or general anesthesia for open hernia repair: a randomized trial.  Ann Surg. 2003;  4 574-579
  • 14 Nordin P, Zetterstrom H, Carlsson P. et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis of local, regional and general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia repair using data from a randomized clinical trial.  Br J Surg. 2007;  94 500-505
  • 15 Reid T D, Sanjay P, Woodward A. Local anesthetic hernia repair in overweight and obese patients.  World J Surg. 2009;  33 138-141
  • 16 Tangjaroen S, Watanapa P. Mini-cholecystectomy under LA.  Asian J Surg. 2007;  30 235-238
  • 17 Séfiani T, Uscain M, Sany J L. et al . Coeliochirurgie sous anesthésie locale et hypnosédation, à propos de 35 cholécystectomies et 15 cures de hernies.  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2004;  23 1093-1101

M. GinerMD 

Department of Surgery
School of Medicine
Complutense University of Madrid
Pza./ Ramón y Cajal s/n
Ciudad Universitaria

28040-Madrid
Spain

Fax: +34-913303183

Email: manginer@med.ucm.es

    >