Endoscopy 2010; 42(8): 652-655
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244233
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

“Eye-tracking” for assessment of image perception in gastrointestinal endoscopy with narrow-band imaging compared with white-light endoscopy

A.  Meining1 , S.  Atasoy1 , 2 , 3 , A.  Chung2 , N.  Navab3 , G.  Z.  Yang2
  • 1II Medical Department, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany
  • 2Visual Information Processing Group, Imperial College, London, UK
  • 3Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University Munich, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 26 January 2010

accepted after revision 28 April 2010

Publication Date:
10 June 2010 (online)

Background and study aims: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a new imaging methodology for improving the detection rate of gastrointestinal lesions. We aimed to evaluate perception of images by NBI and corresponding standard white-light-endoscopy (WLE) using a computer-guided eye-tracking system.

Methods: A total of 23 NBI images of various lesions with the 23 corresponding WLE images were assessed in random order by 18 subjects with various endoscopy experience. Before evaluation, a teaching set of three NBI and corresponding WLE images was shown to highlight the characteristics of lesions. An eye-tracking system (Tobii X series with integrated 17-inch monitor) was used to record the eye movements of the subjects while they examined respective images. The following parameters were measured: total time spent on image, time until first fixation of lesion, total number of fixations per image and per lesion, and number of fixations until finding the lesion.

Results: In total, 828 experiments were conducted. Lesions could not be detected in 6.5 % (NBI) and 4.1 % (WLE) of images (P = NS). The total number of fixations and total time spent on respective figures as a whole were significantly greater for NBI images compared with WLE images (P < 0.003). However, the number of fixations until the lesion was found, the number of fixations on the lesion, and the time until first fixation of the lesion did not differ between the two image groups (P > 0.1).

Conclusion: This is the first study using eye tracking to evaluate image perception in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Significant differences in the interpretation of NBI and WLE images were observed, which may be relevant for the detection and characterization of lesions during endoscopy.

References

  • 1 Sano Y, Ikematsu H, Fu K I. et al . Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 278-283
  • 2 East J E, Suzuki N, Bassett P. et al . Narrow band imaging with magnification for the characterization of small and diminutive colonic polyps: pit pattern and vascular pattern intensity.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 811-817
  • 3 Kara M A, Ennahachi M, Fockens P. et al . Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett’s esophagus by using narrow band imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 155-166
  • 4 Rastogi A, Keighley J, Singh V. et al . High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;  104 2422-2430
  • 5 Su M Y, Hsu C M, Ho Y P. et al . Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2711-2716
  • 6 Tischendorf J J, Wasmuth H E, Koch A. et al . Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1092-1096
  • 7 Rex D K, Helbig C C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.  Gastroenterol. 2007;  133 42-47
  • 8 Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A. et al . The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  7 1049-1054
  • 9 Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates.  Gut. 2008;  57 1406-1412
  • 10 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou I S. et al . A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?.  Gut. 2008;  57 59-64
  • 11 Curvers W L, Bohmer C J, Mallant-Hent R C. et al . Mucosal morphology in Barrett’s esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 799-805
  • 12 Curvers W L, van den Broek F J, Reitsma J B. et al . Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of abnormalities in the esophagus and stomach (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 307-317
  • 13 van den Broek F J, Reitsma J B, Curvers W L. et al . Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 124-135
  • 14 Pohl J, Lotterer E, Balzer C. et al . Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial.  Gut. 2009;  58 73-78
  • 15 Hoffman A, Kagel C, Goetz M. et al . Recognition and characterization of small colonic neoplasia with high-definition colonoscopy using i-Scan is as precise as chromoendoscopy.  Dig Liver Dis. 2010;  42 45-50
  • 16 Kara M A, Peters F P, Fockens P. et al . Endoscopic video-autofluorescence imaging followed by narrow band imaging for detecting early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 176-185

A. MeiningMD 

Technical University of Munich
II Medizinische Klinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar

TU München Munich 81675
Germany

Fax: +49-89-41404905

Email: Alexander.Meining@lrz.tum.de

    >