Zusammenfassung
Zusammenfassend sind Plattenepithelkarzinome des Ösophagus seitens ihrer Ätiopathogenese,
Tumorbiologie, Komorbidität und ihres operativen Risikos sowie der Prognose eine komplett
unterschiedliche Entität verglichen mit den Adenokarzinomen. Beim oberflächlichen
Plattenepithelkarzinom besteht bereits ab der Mukosainfiltrationstiefe m3 das Risiko
einer relevanten Lymphknotenmetastasierung und somit die Indikation zur onkologischen
Resektion. Beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Plattenepithelkarzinom ist die neoadjuvante
Radiochemotherapie internationaler Standard. Eine Früh-Response-Determinierung sollte
angestrebt werden. Nonresponder müssen frühzeitig erkannt und einer Salvage-Operation
mit vertretbarem operativen Risiko zugeführt werden. Die definitive Radiochemotherapie
ist aufgrund ihrer hohen kompletten Response eine Option insbesondere für hochsitzende
Plattenepithelkarzinome und für Patienten mit hohem operativen Risiko, wenngleich
die lokale Tumorkontrolle nach operativer Therapie signifikant besser ist. Aufgrund
des Erfolgs der definitiven Radiochemotherapie stellt sich zunehmend die Frage, ob
zukünftig eine chirurgische Resektion nach neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie weiterhin
erforderlich ist, oder ob durch die alleinige Radiochemotherapie ähnliche Ergebnisse
des rezidivfreien Überlebens und des Gesamtüberlebens erreicht werden können. Die
chirurgische Therapie sollte immer in einem Expertenzentrum mit niedriger Morbidität
und Mortalität durchgeführt werden. Im Fokus zukünftiger Forschung stehen Prädiktoren
der histopathologischen Response, um möglicherweise gezielter die chirurgische Morbidität
bei Patienten mit kompletter pathologischer Response nach multimodaler Therapie zu
vermeiden.
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinomas of the oesophagus are a completely different entity from
adenocarcinomas in regard to their aetiopathology, tumour biology, co-morbidity, operative
risk, and prognosis. For superficial squamous cell carcinomas, the risk of a relevant
lymph node metastatisation already exists from the mucosal infiltration level m3 onward,
and thus oncological resection is indicated. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is the
international standard for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma. The early-response
should be determined. Non-responders must be identified early, and a salvage operation
with a justifiable operative risk should be carried out. Due to its high complete
response rate, definitive radiochemotherapy is an option especially for squamous cell
carcinomas of the upper third of the oesophagus and for patients with a high operative
risk, even though local tumour control is significantly better after surgical therapy.
Due to the success of definitive radiochemotherapy, the question is being asked increasingly,
whether surgical resection after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy will still be necessary
in the future or whether radiochemotherapy alone can attain similar results for relapse-free
survival and total survival. Surgical therapy should always be carried out in a specialised
high volume centre with low morbidity and mortality. Future research will focus on
predictors of the histopathological response, in order to possibly more accurately
avoid surgical morbidity in patients with complete pathological responses after multimodal
therapy.
Schlüsselwörter
Plattenepithelkarzinom des Ösophagus - Stellenwert der Chirurgie - therapeutisches
Konzept
Key words
squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus - impact of surgery - therapeutic concept
Literatur
- 1
Brown L M, Devesa S S, Chow W H.
Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage,
and age.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
2008;
100
1184-1187
- 2
Blot W J, Devesa S S, Kneller R W. et al .
Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia.
JAMA.
1991;
256
1287-1289
- 3
Devesa S S, Blot W J, Fraumeni J F.
Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United
States.
Cancer.
1998;
83
2049-2053
- 4
Brown L M, Devesa S S.
Epidemiologic trends in esophageal and gastric cancer in the United States.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am.
2002;
11
235-256
- 5
Corley D A, Buffler P A.
Oesophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas: analysis of regional variation using
the cancer incidence in five continents database.
Int J Epidemiology.
2001;
30
1415-1425
- 6
Chang S S, Lu C L, Chao J Y. et al .
Unchanging trend of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia in Taiwan:
a 15-year experience in a single center.
Dig Dis Sci.
2002;
47
735-740
- 7
Hongo Jr M.
Review article: Barrett’s oesophagus and carcinoma in Japan.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2004;
20 (Suppl 8)
50-54
- 8
Law S, Wong J.
Changing disease burden and management issues for esophageal cancer in the Asia-Pacific
region.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2002;
17
374-381
- 9
Shibata S, Matsuda T, Ajiki W. et al .
Trend in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in Japan, 1993 – 2001.
Jpn J Clin Oncol.
2008;
38
464-468
- 10
Fock K M, Talley N J, Fass R. et al .
Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: update.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2008;
23
8-22
- 11
Wong W M, Lam S K, Hui W M. et al .
Long-term perspective follow-up of endoscopic oesophagitis in southern Chinese – prevalence
and spectrum of the disease.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2002;
16
2037-2042
- 12
Hongo M, Nagasaki Y, Shoji T.
Epidemiology of esophageal cancer: Orient to Occident. Effects of chronology, geography
and ethnicity.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2009;
24
729-735
- 13
The Coordinating Group for Research on the Etiology of Esophageal Cancer of North
China .
The epidemiology of esophageal cancer in North China and preliminary results in the
investigation of its etiological factors.
Scientia Sinica.
1991;
18
131-148
- 14
Ribeiro Jr U, Posner M C, Safatale-Ribeiro A V. et al .
Risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus.
Br J Surg.
1996;
83
1174-1185
- 15
Siewert J R, Ott K.
Are squamous and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus the same disease?.
Semin Radiat Oncol.
2006;
17
38-44
- 16
Takubo K, Aida J, Sawabe M. et al .
Early squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: the Japanese viewpoint.
Histopathology.
2007;
51
733-742
- 17
Endo M, Yoshino K, Kawano T. et al .
Clinicopathologic analysis of lymph node metastasis in surgically resected superficial
cancer of the thoracic esophagus.
Dis Esophagus.
2000;
13
125-129
- 18
Eguchi T, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T. et al .
Histopathological criteria for additional treatment after endoscopic mucosal resection
for esophageal cancer: analysis of 464 surgically resected cases.
Mod Pathol.
2006;
19
475-480
- 19
Matsubara T, Ueda M, Abe T. et al .
Unique distribution patterns of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with superficial
carcinoma of the thoracic oesophagus.
Br J Surg.
1999;
86
669-673
- 20
Narahara H, Iishi H, Tatsuta M. et al .
Effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection with submucosal saline injection technique
for superficial squamous carcinomas of the esophagus.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2000;
52
730-734
- 21
Shimizu Y, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M. et al .
Metachronous squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus arising after endoscopic mucosal
resection.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
190-194
- 22
Shimizu Y, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M. et al .
Long-term outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with esophageal squamous
cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae and deeper.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2002;
56
387-390
- 23
Pech O, Gossner L, May A. et al .
Endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas: western experience.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2004;
99
1126-1232
- 24
Pech O, May A, Gossner L. et al .
Curative endoscopic therapy in patients with early esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma
or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Endoscopy.
2008;
39
30-35
- 25
Katada C, Muto M, Manabe T. et al .
Local recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus after EMR.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
61
219-225
- 26
Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N. et al .
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal squamous cell neoplasms.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2006;
4
688-694
- 27
Oyama T, Miyata Y, Shimatani S. et al .
Lymph node metastasis of m3 and sm1 esophageal cancer.
I Cho (Stomach Intestine).
2002;
37
71-74
- 28
Gockel I, Domeyer M, Sgourakis G G. et al .
Prediction model of lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma
and squamous cell cancer including D 2 – 40 immunostaining.
J Surg Oncol.
2009;
100
191-198
- 29
Gockel I, Sgourakis G, Lyros O. et al .
Risk of lymph node metastasis in submucosal esophageal cancer: A review of surgically
resected patients.
submitted.
- 30
Bollschweiler E, Baldus S E, Schröder W. et al .
High rate of lymph-node metastasis in submucosal esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas
and adenocarcinomas.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
149-156
- 31
Stein H J, Feith M, Bruecher B L. et al .
Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term
survival after surgical resection.
Ann Surg.
2005;
242
566-573
- 32
Stahl M, Oliveira J (on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group).
Esophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
Ann Oncol.
2008;
19 (Suppl 2)
ii21-ii22
- 33
Gockel I, Kneist W, Junginger T.
Incurable esophageal cancer: patterns of tumor spread and therapeutic consequences.
World J Surg.
2006;
30
183-190
- 34
Kelsen D P, Ginsberg R, Pajak T F. et al .
Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal
cancer.
N Engl J Med.
1998;
339
1979-1984
- 35
Urschel J D, Vasan H.
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation
and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer.
Am J Surg.
2003;
186
538-543
- 36
Fiorica F, Di Bona D, Schepis F. et al .
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gut.
2004;
53
925-930
- 37
Malthaner R A, Wong R, Rumble R B. et al .
,.
BMC Med.
2004;
2
35-51
- 38
Stuschke M, Sarbia M.
Neoadjuvante Radiochemotherapie und Responseprädiktion.
Onkologe.
2004;
10
1179-1190
- 39
Greer S E, Goodney P P, Sutton J E. et al .
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Surgery.
2005;
137
172-177
- 40
Gebski V, Burmeister B, Smithers B M. et al .
Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal
carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Lancet Oncol.
2007;
8
226-234
- 41
Burmeister B H, Smithers B M, Gebski V. et al .
Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of
the oesophagus. A randomised controlled phase III trial.
Lancet Oncol.
2005;
6
659-668
- 42
Tepper J, Krasna M J, Niedzwiecki D. et al .
Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy,
and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781.
J Clin Oncol.
2008;
26
1086-1092
- 43
Jouve J, Michel P, Mariette C. et al .
,.
J Clin Oncol.
2008;
26 (Suppl)
220 (Abstr. 4555)
- 44
Stahl M.
Combined preoperative radiochemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma: The view of the
medical oncologist.
Chirurg.
2009;
Epub ahead of print
- 45
Weber W A, Ott K, Becker K. et al .
Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric
junction by metabolic imaging.
J Clin Oncol.
2001;
19
3058-3065
- 46
Ott K, Weber W A, Lordick F. et al .
Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinoma of
the esophagogastric junction.
J Clin Oncol.
2006;
24
4692-4698
- 47
Lordick F, Ott K, Krause B J. et al .
PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of
the oesophagogastric junction: the Municon phase II trial.
Lancet Oncol.
2007;
8
797-805
- 48
Wieder H, Brücher B L, Zimmermann F. et al .
Time course of tumor metabolic activity during chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous
cell carcinoma and response to treatment.
J Clin Oncol.
2004;
22
900-908
- 49
Gillham C M, Lucey J A, Keogan M. et al .
18FDG uptake during induction chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer fails to predict
histomorphological tumour response.
Br J Cancer.
2006;
95
1174-1179
- 50
Brücher B L, Weber W, Bauer M. et al .
Neoadjuvant therapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Response evaluation by
positron emission tomography.
Ann Surg.
2001;
233
300-309
- 51
Brücher B LDM, Swisher S G, Königsrainer A. et al .
Response to preoperative therapy in upper gastrointestinal cancers.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2009;
16
878-886
- 52
Stahl M, Stuschke M, Lehmann N. et al .
Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous
cell carcinoma of the esophagus.
J Clin Oncol.
2005;
23
2311-2317
- 53
Stahl M, Wilke H, Lehmann N. et al .
Long-term results of a phase III study investigating chemoradiation with and without
surgery in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (LA-SCC) of the esophagus.
J Clin Oncol.
2008;
26 (Suppl)
220 (Abstr. 4530)
- 54
Bedenne L, Michel P, Bouché O. et al .
Chemoradiation followed by surgery compared with chemoradiation alone in squamous
cell cancer of the esophagus: FFCD 9102.
J Clin Oncol.
2007;
25
1160-1186
- 55
Stahl M.
Clinical recommendations. Esophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical recommendations for diagnosis,
treatment and follow-up.
Ann Oncol.
2007;
18 (Suppl 2)
ii15-ii16
PD Dr. Ines Gockel
Klinik für Allgemein- und Abdominalchirurgie, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität
Langenbeckstr. 1
55131 Mainz
Phone: ++ 49/61 31/17 72 91
Fax: ++ 49/61 31/17 66 30
Email: gockel@ach.klinik.uni-mainz.de