Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48(10): 1219-1224
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245567
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoskopische Prozeduren bei Patienten unter antithrombotischer Medikation – Risiken und praktisches Vorgehen

Endoscopic Procedures for Patients on Antithrombotic Medication – Risks and MethodsS. Müller-Lissner1 , H. Riess2
  • 1Abteilung Innere Medizin, Park-Klinik Weissensee
  • 2Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Manuskript eingetroffen: 11.3.2010

Manuskript akzeptiert: 24.6.2010

Publikationsdatum:
30. September 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung

In die Entscheidung, wie mit einer antithrombotischen Therapie umzugehen ist, wenn eine endoskopische Intervention im Bereich des Gastrointestinaltrakts ansteht, geht sowohl das Blutungsrisiko der Maßnahme als auch das Risiko thrombembolischer Komplikationen bei Pausieren der Medikation ein. Das Blutungsrisiko endoskopischer Maßnahmen ohne absehbare Eröffnung der Blutbahn und bei endoskopischen Biopsien ist vernachlässigbar, auch bei oraler Antikoagulation. Diese muss daher nur pausiert werden, wenn blutungsgefährdete Interventionen wie Polypektomie, EPT o. Ä. anstehen. Bei hohem Risiko für thrombembolische Komplikationen wie Kunstklappe in Mitralposition oder Vorhofflimmern mit Risikofaktoren muss passager auf kürzer wirksame und damit besser steuerbare Antikoagulanzien gewechselt werden („Bridging”). Bei Therapie mit Plättchenfunktionshemmern und niedrigem Blutungsrisiko inkl. Biopsie bestehen keine Bedenken gegen den Eingriff. Vor unaufschiebbaren Eingriffen mit hohem Blutungsrisiko soll Clopidogrel nach Rücksprache mit dem Kardiologen für eine Woche pausiert werden. Für die Koloskopie z. B. in Form der Screening-Koloskopie bestehen 2 Optionen: 1. Pausieren einer oralen Antikoagulation (ggf. mit Bridging) bzw. Clopidogrelmedikation zur Koloskopie, 2. Weiterführen der antithrombotischen Medikation mit erneuter elektiver Endoskopie zur Polypektomie bei reduzierter antithrombotischer Medikation, wenn Polypen, die nicht durch Biopsie entfernt werden konnten, entdeckt wurden. Die Entscheidung zwischen diesen Optionen muss individuell fallen.

Abstract

The decision how to handle an antithrombotic treatment when an intervention during GI endoscopy is planned is influenced both by the risk of bleeding and by the thomboembolic risk when treatment is suspended. The risk of bleeding is negligible even when on oral anticoagulants in diagnostic procedures with standard forceps biopsies. Oral anticoagulation has to be stopped, however, when planning invasive procedures such as polypectomy or EPT. In the case of patients with a high risk of thromboembolic complications such as artificial valves in mitral position or atrial fibrillation with risk factors, one has to temporarily switch to anticoagulants with shorter action (”bridging”). Treatment with inhibitors of platelet function does not preclude procedures with a low risk of bleeding including forceps biopsy. Urgent procedures with a high risk of bleeding should be performed after stopping clopidogrel one week previously but only after consultation with the treating cardiologist. In the case of colonoscopy, in particular as a screening procedure, there are two options: 1) stopping oral anticoagulation (with or without bridging) or clopidogrel, respectively, or 2) continuing antithrombotic treatment and performing a second elective endoscopy for polypectomy with tapered antithrombotic medication if polyps are found which are not amenable to resection by biopsy forceps. The choice between these two options has to be made individually.

Literatur

  • 1 Scharf R E. Management of bleeding in patients using antithrombotic agents. Prediction, prevention, protection and problem-oriented intervention.  Hämostaseologie. 2009;  29 388-398
  • 2 Burger W, Chemnitius J M, Kneissl D et al. Low-dose aspirin for secondary cardiovascular prevention – cardiovascular risks after its perioperative withdrawal versus bleeding risks with ist continuation – review and meta-analysis.  J Intern Med. 2005;  257 399-414
  • 3 Douketis J D, Berger P B, Dunn A S et al. The perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).  Chest. 2008;  133 299S-339S
  • 4 Rosenfeldt M T, Haverkamp W, Trappe R et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients receiving antithrombotic drugs: what to heed?.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006;  131 982-986
  • 5 Bowles C J, Leicester R, Romaya C et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
  • 6 Gibbs D H, Opelka F G, Beck D E et al. Postpolypectomy colonic hemorrhage.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 806-810
  • 7 Rosen L, Bub D S, Reed 3rd  J F et al. Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 1126-1131
  • 8 Shiffman M L, Farrel M T, Yee Y S. Risk of bleeding after endoscopic biopsy or polypectomy in patients taking aspirin or other NSAIDS.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 458-462
  • 9 Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 620-627
  • 10 Wexner S D, Garbus J E, Singh J J et al. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 251-261
  • 11 Yousfi M, Gostout C J, Baron T H et al. Postpolypectomy lower gastrointestinal bleeding: potential role of aspirin.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1785-1789
  • 12 Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 383-393
  • 13 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
  • 14 Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 417-423
  • 15 Nelson D B, Freeman M L. Major hemorrhage from endoscopic sphincterotomy: risk factor analysis.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;  19 283-287
  • 16 Vaira D, D’Anna L, Ainley C et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients.  Lancet. 1989;  2 431-434
  • 17 Wang P, Li Z S, Liu F et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;  104 31-40
  • 18 Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K et al. Technical feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients taking anti-coagulants or anti-platelet agents.  J Gastroenterol. 2009;  44 1185-1189
  • 19 Neale J C, Goulden J W, Allan S G et al. Esophageal stents in malignant dysphagia: a two-edged sword?.  J Palliat Care. 2004;  20 28-31
  • 20 Wang M Q, Sze D Y, Wang Z P et al. Delayed complications after esophageal stent placement for treatment of malignant esophageal obstructions and esophagorespiratory fistulas.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12 465-474
  • 21 Luman W, Kwek K R, Loi K L et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy – indications and outcome of our experience at the Singapore General Hospital.  Singapore Med J. 2001;  42 460-465
  • 22 Yao M D, Rosenvinge E C, Groden von C et al. Multiple endoscopic biopsies in research subjects: safety results from a National Institutes of Health series.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 906-910
  • 23 Anderson M A, Ben-Menachem T, Gan S I et al. ASGE guideline: Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 1060-1070
  • 24 Veitch A M, Baglin T P, Gershlick A H et al. Guidelines for the management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures.  Gut. 2008;  57 1322-1329
  • 25 Bini E J, Firoozi B, Choung R J et al. Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: A prospective 30-day outcomes study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 816
  • 26 Hui A J, Wong R M, Ching J Y et al. Risk of colonoscopic polypectomy bleeding with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents: analysis of 1657 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 44-48
  • 27 Kim H S, Kim T I, Kim W H et al. Risk factors for immediate postpolypectomy bleeding of the colon: a multicenter study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 1333-1341
  • 28 Sorbi D, Norton I, Conio M et al. Postpolypectomy lower GI bleeding: descriptive analysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 690-696
  • 29 Hussain N, Alsulaiman R, Burtin P et al. The safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients receiving antiplatelet agents: a case-control study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;  25 579-584
  • 30 Oren A, Breumelhof R, Timmer R et al. Abnormal clotting parameters before therapeutic ERCP: do they predict major bleeding?.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;  11 1093-1097
  • 31 Sawhney M S, Salfiti N, Nelson D B et al. Risk factors for severe delayed postpolypectomy bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 115-119
  • 32 Barkay O, Niv E, Santo E et al. Low-dose heparin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 1971-1976
  • 33 Rabenstein T, Fischer B, Wiessner V et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin does not prevent acute post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 606-613
  • 34 Singh M, Mehta N, Murthy U K et al. Postpolypectomy bleeding in patients undergoing colonoscopy on uninterrupted clopidogrel therapy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  71 998-1005
  • 35 Hsieh Y H, Lin H J, Tseng G Y et al. Is submucosal epinephrine injection necessary before polypectomy? A prospective, comparative study.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;  48 1379-1382
  • 36 Friedland S, Sedehi D, Soetikno R. Colonoscopic polypectomy in anticoagulated patients.  World J Gastroenterol. 2009;  15 1973-1976
  • 37 Hui C K, Lai K C, Yuen M F et al. Does withholding aspirin for one week reduce the risk of post-sphincterotomy bleeding?.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;  16 929-936
  • 38 Gogarten W, Aken van H, Büttner J et al. Regional anaesthesia and thromboembolism prophylaxis/anticoagulation – Revised recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthsiology and Intensive Care Medicine.  Anästh Intensivmedizin. 2007;  48 S109-S124
  • 39 Gage B F, Waterman A D, Shannon W et al. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation.  JAMA. 2001;  285 2864-2870
  • 40 Blacker D J, Wijdicks E F, McClelland R L. Stroke risk in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing endoscopy.  Neurology. 2003;  61 964-968
  • 41 Berdague P, Boneu B, Soula P h et al. Usefulness of low molecular weight heparins during post-operative period in mitral mechanical valve replacement: clinical ischaemic and haemorrhagic complications in 110 cases (abstract).  Eur Heart J. 1998;  19 (Suppl) 534
  • 42 Fork F T, Lafolie P, Tóth E et al. Gastroduodenal tolerance of 75 mg clopidogrel versus 325 mg aspirin in healthy volunteers. A gastroscopic study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 464-469
  • 43 Sørensen R, Hansen M L, Abildstrom S Z et al. Risk of bleeding in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with different combinations of aspirin, clopidogrel, and vitamin K antagonists in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of nationwide registry data.  Lancet. 2009;  374 1967-1974
  • 44 Foley P, Foley S, Kinnaird T et al. Clinical review: gastrointestinal bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: a deadly combination.  QJM. 2008;  101 425-433
  • 45 Chassot P G, Delabays A, Spahn D R. Perioperative antiplatelet therapy: the case for continuing therapy in patients at risk of myocardial infarction.  Brit J Anaesth. 2007;  99 316-328
  • 46 Collet J P, Montalescot G, Blanchet B et al. Impact of prior use or recent withdrawal of oral antiplatelet agents on acute coronary syndromes.  Circulation. 2004;  110 2361-2367
  • 47 Ho P, Peterson E D, Wang L et al. Incidence of death and acute myocardial infarction associated with stopping Clopidogrel after acute coronary syndrome.  JAMA. 2008;  299 532-539
  • 48 Moussa I D, Colombo A. Antiplatelet therapy discontinuation following drug-eluting stent placement: dangers, reasons, and management recommendations.  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;  74 1047-1054
  • 49 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand . Guidelines for the management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary stents undergoing non-cardiac surgery.  Heart Lung Cir. 2010;  19 2-10
  • 50 Patti G, Colonna G, Pasceri V et al. Randomized trial of high loading dose of Clopidogrel for reduction of periprocedural myocardial infarction in patients undergoing coronary intervention: results from the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of Myocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study.  Circulation. 2005;  111 2099-2106
  • 51 Altenhofen L, Heringer M, Blaschy S et al. Projekt wissenschaftliche Begleitung von Früherkennungs-Koloskopien in Deutschland. http://www.zi-berlin.de/koloskopie/downloads/Jahresbericht_2007_Berlin_Vers_1_1.pdf
  • 52 Bokemeyer B, Bock H, Hüppe D et al. Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention: results from a German online registry on 269 000 cases.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  21 650-655
  • 53 Becker R C, Scheiman J, Dauerman H L et al. Management of platelet-directed pharmacotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease undergoing elective endoscopic gastrointestinal procedures.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;  104 2903-2917
  • 54 Cryer B. Management of patients with high gastrointestinal risk on antiplatelet therapy.  Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2009;  38 289-303

Prof. Stefan Müller-Lissner

Abteilung Innere Medizin, Park-Klinik Weissensee

Schönstraße 80

13086 Berlin

Telefon: ++ 49/30/96 28 36 00

Fax: ++ 49/30/96 28 36 05

eMail: mueli@park-klinik.com

    >