Int J Sports Med 2010; 31(5): 359-363
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247595
Behavioural Sciences

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Gender and Contraction Mode on Perceived Exertion

D. M. Pincivero1 , R. R. Polen2 , B. N. Byrd3
  • 1Wilfrid Laurier University, Kinesiology & Physical Education, Waterloo, Canada
  • 2University of Pittsburgh, Physical Therapy, Pittsburgh, United States
  • 3Ohio University, Physical Therapy, Athens, United States
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision January 11, 2010

Publication Date:
10 February 2010 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine perceived exertion responses during concentric and eccentric elbow flexor contractions between young adult men and women. Thirty healthy young adults participated in two experimental sessions. During the first session, subjects performed five concentric isokinetic maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) of elbow flexion, followed by nine, randomly-ordered sub-maximal contractions (10–90% MVC). The same procedures were repeated during the second session, with the exception that eccentric contractions were performed. Subjects rated their perceived exertion following the sub-maximal contractions with the Borg category-ratio scale. Perceived exertion was significantly (p<0.05) less than equivalent values on the CR-10 scale at intensities greater than, and equal to, 30% MVC. A three-factor interaction between 30–40% MVC indicated that perceived exertion increased more during the eccentric, than concentric, contractions in women, while the opposite pattern was evident for the men. There were no significant contraction mode or gender differences. Power function modeling revealed that perceived exertion increased in a negatively accelerating manner, except for the men performing eccentric exercise. Perceived exertion increases in a similar non-linear manner between men and women during concentric contractions, while men exhibited a statistically linear pattern during eccentric contractions.

References

  • 1 Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 377-381
  • 2 Cooper DF, Grimby G, Jones DA, Edwards RHT. Perception of effort in isometric and dynamic muscular contraction.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1979;  41 173-180
  • 3 Edin BB, Vallbo AB. Dynamic response of human muscle spindle afferents to stretch.  J Neurophysiol. 1990;  63 1297-1306
  • 4 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 701-702
  • 5 Hollander DB, Durand RJ, Trynicki JL, Larock D, Castracane VD, Hebert EP, Kraemer RR. RPE, pain, and physiological adjustment to concentric and eccentric contractions.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;  35 1017-1025
  • 6 Hollander DB, Kilpatrick MW, Ramadan ZG, Reeves GV, Francois M, Blakeney A, Castracane VD, Kraemer RR. Load rather than contraction type influences rate of perceived exertion and pain.  J Strength Cond Res. 2008;  22 1184-1193
  • 7 Kellis E, Baltzopoulos V. Muscle activation differences between eccentric and concentric isokinetic actions.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 1616-1623
  • 8 Noble BJ, Borg GAV, Jacobs I, Ceci R, Kaiser P. A category-ratio perceived exertion scale: relationship to blood and muscle lactates and heart rate.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;  15 523-528
  • 9 Noble BJ, Robertson RJ. Perceived Exertion. Human Kinetics Publishers. Champaign, IL 1996: 4-71
  • 10 Pincivero DM, Gandhi V, Timmons MK, Coelho AJ. Quadriceps femoris electromyogram during concentric, isometric and eccentric phases of fatiguing dynamic knee extensions.  J Biomech. 2006;  39 246-254
  • 11 Pincivero DM, Coelho AJ, Campy RM. Perceived exertion and maximal quadriceps femoris muscle strength during dynamic knee extension exercise in young adults males and females.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;  89 150-156
  • 12 Pincivero DM, Campy RM, Coelho AJ. Knee flexor torque and perceived exertion: a gender and reliability analysis.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;  35 1720-1726
  • 13 Pincivero DM, Lephart SM, Moyna NM, Karunakara RG, Robertson RJ. Neuromuscular activation and RPE in the quadriceps at low and high isometric intensities.  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;  39 43-48
  • 14 Stevens JC, Mack JD. Scales of apparent force.  Exp Psychol. 1959;  58 405-413
  • 15 Stevens SS. On the psychophysical law.  Psychol Rev. 1957;  64 153-181

Correspondence

Dr. Danny M. Pincivero

Wilfrid Laurier University

Kinesiology & Physical Education

75 University Avenue West

N2L-3C5 Waterloo

Canada

Phone: +1/519-884-1970

Fax: +1/519-747-4594

Email: dpincivero@wlu.ca

    >