Endoscopy 2010; 42(11): 885-888
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255714
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prospective comparison between double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy

T.  Frieling1 , J.  Heise1 , W.  Sassenrath1 , A.  Hülsdonk1 , C.  Kreysel1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectiology, Neurogastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, HELIOS-Clinic Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 3 March 2010

accepted after revision 18 June 2010

Publication Date:
27 August 2010 (online)

Background and study aims: Push enteroscopy, balloon-guided, and single- and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) are now well established techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy for small-bowel imaging and therapy. There are no published prospective studies comparing DBE with spiral enteroscopy and so the aim of the current study was to compare the performance of the two techniques in patients undergoing diagnostic enteroscopy.

Patients and methods: Between January and December 2009, 35 patients referred for diagnostic enteroscopy were prospectively assigned to either spiral enteroscopy (n = 18) or DBE (n = 17). The performance of the two techniques was compared.

Results: The patients were comparable with regard to age, sex, and indication for enteroscopy. Investigation performance, as assessed by time of insertion into the pylorus, the depth of insertion, the duration of the enteroscopy, and the amount of sedoanalgesia required were not significantly different between spiral enteroscopy and DBE. In 40 % of the investigations, enteroscopy could detect abnormalities in the intestinal mucosa, in particular inflammatory changes and ulcers and, to a lesser extent, angiodysplasia. No significant difference in pathological findings could be detected between the two groups; however, clinically, diagnostic yield appeared to be higher for DBE (47.1 % vs. 33.4 %; n. s.).

Conclusion: Although this small study appears to show that DBE has a clinically higher diagnostic yield than spiral enteroscopy, larger studies are needed to confirm this preliminary finding.

References

  • 1 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y. et al . Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
  • 2 Yamamoto H, Yano T, Kita H. et al . New system of double-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal disorders.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 1556-1557
  • 3 May A, Nachbar L, Wardak A. et al . Double-balloon enteroscopy: preliminary experience in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic abdominal pain.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 985-991
  • 4 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K. et al . Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 1010-1016
  • 5 Ell C, May A, Nachbar L. et al . Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon technique: results of a prospective European multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 613-616
  • 6 Heine G DN, Hadithi M, Groenen M J. et al . Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 42-48
  • 7 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A. et al . Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 11-15
  • 8 Lo S K. Small bowel endoscopy: have we conquered the final frontier?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 536-538
  • 9 Mönkemüller K, Olano C, Fry L C, Malfertheiner P. Small-bowel endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 55-58
  • 10 Akerman P A, Agrawal D, Chen W. et al . Spiral enteroscopy: a novel method of enteroscopy by using the Endo-Ease Discovery SB overtube and a pediatric colonoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 327-332
  • 11 Matsumoto T, Moriyama T, Esaki M. et al . Performance of antegrade double-balloon enteroscopy: comparison with push enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 392-398
  • 12 May A, Färber M, Aschmoneit I. et al . Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders.  Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication, 5 January. 2010;  doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.712
  • 13 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M. et al . Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 66-70
  • 14 Akerman P, Cantero D, Bookwalter W. et al . A new in vitro porcine model for spiral enteroscopy training: the Akerman enterosocopy trainer [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB264
  • 15 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M, Ell C. Prospective comparison of push enteroscopy and push-and-pull enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2016-2024
  • 16 Gerson L B. Double-balloon enteroscopy: the new gold standard for small-bowel imaging?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 71-75
  • 17 Mensink P B, Haringsma J, Kucharzik T. et al . Complications of double balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey.  Endoscopy. 2007;  3 613-615
  • 18 May A, Nachbar L, Pohl J. et al . Endoscopic interventions in the small bowel using double balloon enteroscopy: feasibility and limitations.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 527-535

T. FrielingMD 

Medizinische Klinik II
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectiology, Neurogastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology
HELIOS-Clinic Krefeld

Lutherplatz 40
47805 Krefeld
Germany

Fax: +49-2151-322078

Email: thomas.frieling@helios-kliniken.de

    >