Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

M. Wallace; G. Y. Lauwers; Y. Chen; E. Dekker; P. Fockens; P. Sharma; A. Meining

doi:10.1055/s-0030-1256632

Endoscopy, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Endoscopy 2011; 43(10): 882-891
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256632

Review

Miami classification for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

Autoren

M. Wallace

¹Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
G. Y. Lauwers

²Division of Surgical Pathology and Gastrointestinal Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Y. Chen

³Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
E. Dekker

⁴Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
P. Fockens

⁴Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
P. Sharma

⁵Kansas University Medical Center and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
A. Meining

⁶Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Abstract

An essential element for any new advanced imaging technology is standardization of indications, terminology, categorization of images, and research priorities. In this review, we propose a state-of-the-art classification system for normal and pathological states in gastrointestinal disease using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE). The Miami classification system is based on a consensus of pCLE users reached during a meeting held in Miami, Florida, in February 2009.

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Wang TD, Friedland S, Sahbaie P et al. Functional imaging of colonic mucosa with a fibered confocal microscope for real-time in vivo pathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1300-1305
2 Meining A, Bajbouj M, von Delius S, Prinz C. Confocal laser scanning microscopy for in vivo histopathology of the gastrointestinal tract. Arab J Gastroenterol 2007; 8: 14
3 Becker V, von Delius S, Bajbouj M et al Intravenous application of fluorescein for confocal laser scanning microscopy: evaluation of contrast dynamics and image quality with increasing injection-to-imaging time. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 319-323
4 Kwan AS, Barry C, McAllister IL, Constable I. Fluorescein angiography and adverse drug reactions revisited: the Lions Eye experience. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006; 34: 33-38
5 Meining A, Wallace MB. Endoscopic imaging of angiogenesis in vivo. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 915-918
6 Matysiak-Budnik T, Coron E, Mosnier J-F et al 780 Quantitative in vivo assessment of vascular permeability in human colonic mucosa using confocal endomicroscopy: clinical implications for colonic neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: A-123
7 Wang KK, Sampliner RE. Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 788-797
8 Cameron AJ, Carpenter HA. Barrett’s esophagus, high-grade dysplasia, and early adenocarcinoma: a pathological study. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 586-591
9 Kiesslich R, Gossner L, Goetz M et al In vivo histology of Barrett’s esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 979-987
10 Pohl H, Rosch T, Vieth M et al Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 2008; 57: 1648-1653
11 Uhlmann D, Wiedmann M, Schmidt F et al Management and outcome in patients with Klatskin-mimicking lesions of the biliary tree. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 1144-1150
12 Wallace M, Abrams J, Bajbouj M et al Accuracy and inter-observer agreement of experts for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy detection of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB351
13 Sharma P, Meining A, Coron E et al Detection of neoplastic tissue in Barrett’s esophagus with in vivo probe-based confocal endomicroscopy (DONT BIOPCE). Final results of a prospective international RCT: image guided versus 4 quadrant random biopsies?. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: S-155
14 Puhalla H, Schuell B, Pokorny H et al Treatment and outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg 2005; 189: 173-177
15 Rosch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger E et al ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 390-396
16 Ponchon T, Gagnon P, Berger F et al Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 565-572
17 Schoefl R, Haefner M, Wrba F et al Forceps biopsy and brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary stenoses. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 363-368
18 Meining A, Saur D, Bajbouj M et al In vivo histopathology for detection of gastrointestinal neoplasia with a portable, confocal miniprobe: an examiner blinded analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1261-1267
19 Stevens P, Chen Y, Shah R et al Real-time intraductal confocal microscopy during ERCP: feasibility and technical considerations. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB267
20 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M et al Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 706-713
21 Becker V, Vercauteren T, von Weyhern CH et al High-resolution miniprobe-based confocal microscopy in combination with video mosaicing (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 1001-1007
22 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008; 57: 59-64
23 Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T et al Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 410-416
24 van den Broek FJ, van Soest EJ, Naber AH et al Combining autofluorescence imaging and narrow-band imaging for the differentiation of adenomas from non-neoplastic colonic polyps among experienced and non-experienced endoscopists. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1498-1507
25 Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N et al Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1171-1178
26 Sanduleanu S, Driessen A, Gomez-Garcia E et al In vivo diagnosis and classification of colorectal neoplasia by chromoendoscopy-guided confocal laser endomicroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 371-378
27 Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al Comparison of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colon polyps. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 834-842
28 Buchner AM, Gomez V, Heckman MG et al The learning curve of in vivo probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for prediction of colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 556-560
29 Kiesslich R, Fritsch J, Holtmann M et al Methylene blue-aided chromoendoscopy for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and colon cancer in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 880-888
30 Rutter MD, Saunders BP, Schofield G et al Pancolonic indigo carmine dye spraying for the detection of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gut 2004; 53: 256-260
31 van den Broek FJ, Fockens P, van Eeden S et al Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for surveillance in ulcerative colitis: randomised comparison of high-resolution endoscopy and autofluorescence imaging for neoplasia detection; and evaluation of narrow-band imaging for classification of lesions. Gut 2008; 57: 1083-1089
32 Dekker E, vandenBroek FJ, Reitsma JB et al Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 216-221
33 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K et al Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 874-882
34 Hurlstone DP, Thomson M, Brown S et al Confocal endomicroscopy in ulcerative colitis: differentiating dysplasia-associated lesional mass and adenoma-like mass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1235-1241
35 Palma GD, Staibano S, Siciliano S et al In-vivo characterization of DALM in ulcerative colitis with high-resolution probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 677-680
36 Li CQ, Xie XJ, Yu T et al Classification of inflammation activity in ulcerative colitis by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Am J gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1391-1396
37 Kakeji Y, Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D et al Development and assessment of morphologic criteria for diagnosing gastric cancer using confocal endomicroscopy: an ex vivo and in vivo study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 886-890
38 Kitabatake S, Niwa Y, Miyahara R et al Confocal endomicroscopy for the diagnosis of gastric cancer in vivo. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 1110-1114
39 Trovato C, Sonzogni A, Ravizza D et al Celiac disease: in vivo diagnosis by confocal endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 1096-1099
40 Zambelli A, Villanacci V, Buscarini E et al Confocal laser endomicroscopy in celiac disease: description of findings in two cases. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1018-1020
41 Leong RW, Nguyen NQ, Meredith CG et al In vivo confocal endomicroscopy in the diagnosis and evaluation of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1870-1876
42 Vasen HF, Moslein G, Alonso A et al Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut 2008; 57: 704-713
43 Nugent KP, Spigelman AD, Williams CB, Phillips RK. Iatrogenic pancreatitis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 1993; 34: 1269-1270
44 Shahid M, Buchner A, Hasan M et al The role of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in detection of dysplasia in duodenal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB369