Zentralbl Chir 2011; 136(3): 269-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262767
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ˙ New York

Die laparoskopische Wiederanschlussoperation nach Hartmann-Resektion

Laparoscopic Recovery Continuity after the Hartmann ProcedureT. C. Böttger1 , D. Mohseni1 , J. Beardi1 , U. Hesse1
  • 1EuromedClinic, Fürth, Deutschland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 February 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Zwischen dem 1.1.2003 und dem 30.6.2009 wurden 923 komplexe laparoskopische kolorektale Eingriffe von einem Chirurgen vorgenommen und prospektiv anhand einer Datenbank mit 152 Variablen erfasst. Bei 15 Patienten (10 Frauen, 5 Männer) mit einem medianen Alter von 61 Jahren (Spanne: 35–83 Jahre) erfolgte laparoskopisch eine Wieder­anschlussoperation. Bei 3 Patienten war dem Eingriff eine konventionelle Sigma-Diskontinuitäts­resektion, in 12 Fällen eine laparoskopische Kolonresektion mit Hartmann-Situation vorausgegangen. Eine Konversion war in keinem Fall notwendig, die mediane Operationsdauer betrug 100 min. Sowohl intra- als auch postoperativ sahen wir bis auf einen Wundinfekt (6,6 %) keine Komplikationen. Die mediane postoperative Verweildauer betrug 8 Tage. Die laparoskopische Wiederanschlussoperation stellt einen anspruchsvollen Eingriff dar, der für den Geübten technisch ­sicher und gut mit einer geringen Morbidität und Mortalität machbar ist. Die bekannten Vorteile der laparoskopischen Kolon­chirurgie scheinen auf die laparoskopische Wiederanschlussopera­tion übertragbar zu sein. 

Abstract

In the period from January 2003 to June 2009 923 complex laparoscopic colorectal procedures were performed by one surgeon. Data was as­sessed prospectively in a database including 152 variables. In 15 patients (10 f, 5 m), with a median age of 61 years (range: 35–83 years), discontinuity resection of the colon was performed including 3 patients with open discontinuity resection of the sigma and 12 patients with laparoscopic Hartmann procedures. In all cases continuity of the ­colon was recovered laparoscopically. Median op­er­ation time was 100 min, conversion to an open procedure was not necessary. No intra-operative complications occurred and only one wound infection (6.6 %) was recorded postoperatively with a median postoperative stay of 8 days. Although the laparoscopic approach to recover continuity of the colon is technically challenging, we con­clude that the experienced bowel surgeon is able to perform the laparoscopic approach with a low morbidity and mortality by retaining the well known advantages of laparoscopic colonic sur­gery. 

Literatur

  • 1 Hartmann H. Nouveau prodede d’ablation des cancers de la partie ­erminale du colon pelvien. Trentieme Congres de Chirurgie Strasborg 1923; 411–413
  • 2 Meyer F, Marusch F, Koch A et al. Emergency operation in carcinomas of the left colon: value of Hartmann’s procedure.  Tech Coloproctol. 2004;  8 226-229
  • 3 Golash V. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure.  J Min Access Surg. 2006;  2 211-215
  • 4 Haughn C, Ju B, Uchal M et al. Complication rates after Hartmann’s reversal: Open vs. laparoscopic approach.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;  51 1232-1236
  • 5 Mazeh H, Greenstein A J, Swedish K et al. Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure – a comparative retrospective analysis.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23 496-502
  • 6 Rosen M J, Cobb W S, Kercher K W et al. Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann’s procedure.  Am J Surg. 2005;  189 670-674
  • 7 Nugent K P, Daniels P, Stewart B et al. Quality of life in stoma patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 1569-1574
  • 8 Anderson C A, Fowler D L, White S et al. Laparoscopic colostomy closure.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;  3 69-72
  • 9 Kahnamoui K, Cadeddu M, Farrokhyar F et al. Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review.  Surg. 2007;  50 48-57
  • 10 Kube R, Ptok H, Steinert R et al. Clinical value of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.  Chirurg. 2008;  79 1145-1150
  • 11 Schwenk W, Haase 0, Neudecker J et al. Short term benefits for lapa­roscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 3: CD003145
  • 12 Sosa J L, Sleeman D, Puente I et al. Laparoscopic-assisted colostomy closure after Hartmann’s procedure.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;  37 149-152
  • 13 Hermeneit S, Müller M, Terzic A et al. Sense or nonsense of a prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery – a prospective study.  Zentralbl Chir. 2008;  133 250-254
  • 14 Hermeneit S, Müller M, Terzic A et al. Influenceable surgical and anesthesiological risk factors for the development of cardiac and pulmonary complications in laparoscopic surgery of the colon.  Zentralbl Chir. 2008;  133 156-163
  • 15 Menke H, Klein A, Böttger T et al. Pulmonary complications following surgical abdominal interventions. Identification of various risk groups.  Chirurg. 1992;  63 548-552
  • 16 Griffa C, Basilico V, Bellotti R et al. Colon recanalization after Hartmann’s procedure. A challenge for the surgeon or a strategy to be changed?.  Minerva Chir. 2004;  59 489-493
  • 17 Petersen M, Köckerling F, Lippert H et al. Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann procedure.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;  19 48-51
  • 18 Soop M, Nelson H. Perioperative mortality in laparoscopic-assisted vs open resection for colon cancer.  Colorectal Dis. 2008;  10 305-308
  • 19 Tjandra J J, Chan M K. Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.  Colorectal Dis. 2006;  8 375-388
  • 20 Dimick J B, Welch H G, Birkmeyer J D. Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size.  JAMA. 2004;  292 847-851
  • 21 Leroy J, Costantino F, Cahill R A et al. Technical aspects and outcome of standardized full laparoscopic approach to the reversal of Hartmann’s procedure in a teaching centre.  Colorectal Dis. 2010;  Aug 16 (Epub ahead of print)
  • 22 Regadas F S, Siebra J A, Rodrigues L V et al. Laparoscopically assisted colorectal anastomose post-Hartmann’s procedure.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996;  6 1-4
  • 23 Ptok H, Kube R, Schmidt U et al. Conversion from laparoscopic to open colonic cancer resection – associated factors and their influence on long-term oncological outcome.  Surg Oncol. 2009;  35 1273-1279
  • 24 Costantino G N, Mukalian G G. Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure.  J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994;  4 429-433
  • 25 Vernava 3rd A M, Liebscher G, Longo W E. Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann procedure.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;  5 129-132
  • 26 Macpherson S C, Hansell D T, Porteous C. Laparoscopic-assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: A simplified technique and audit of twelve cases.  Surg. 1996;  6 305-310
  • 27 Delgado Gomis F, Garcia Lozano A, Domingo del Pozo C et al. Laparoscopic reconstruction of intestinal continuity following Hartmann’s procedure.  Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1998;  90 499-502
  • 28 Holland J C, Winter D C, Richardson D. Laparoscopically assisted reversal of Hartmann’s procedure revisited.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;  12 291-294
  • 29 Siddiqui M R, Sajid M S, Baig M K. Open vs laparoscopic approach for reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a systematic review.  Colorectal Dis. 2010;  12 733-741

Prof. Dr. T. C. Böttger

EuromedClinic

Europa-Allee 1

90763 Fürth

Deutschland

Phone: +49 / (0)9 11 / 9 71 40

Fax: +49 / (0)9 11 / 9 71 45 55

Email: thomasboettger@gmx.de

    >