Morphometric Measurements of the Anterior Skull Base for Endoscopic Transoral and Transnasal Approaches

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to determine the bony limits of the transnasal and transoral approaches to the anterior skull base. The data we present are meant to assist surgeons in preoperative planning for lesions of the sella, clivus, foramen magnum, and odontoid. Using precise measurements undertaken on 41 high-resolution computed tomography scans from patients at the University of Pennsylvania without any history of sinus or sellar pathology, we sought to define the bony limits of transoral and transnasal approaches. Direct measurements and calculated angles were used to assess the dimensions of the anterior skull base. Using our measurements, a transnasal approach can reach an average of 22.5 mm below the plane of the hard palate to the body of C2, and a transoral route can reach 38 mm above the basion along the length of the clivus. Analysis of variance demonstrated no significant differences when subjects were grouped based on race or gender. The measurements outlined within this article help to define the relative dimensions necessary for adapted transoral and transnasal skull base surgeries.

Skull base - morphometry - transoral - transnasal - endoscopic surgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Gandhi C D, Christiano L D, Eloy J A, Prestigiacomo C J, Post K D. The historical evolution of transsphenoidal surgery: facilitation by technological advances.  Neurosurg Focus. 2009;  27 E8
• 2 Eloy P, Watelet J B, Hatert A S, de Wispelaere J, Bertrand B. Endonasal endoscopic resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma.  Rhinology. 2007;  45 24-30
• 3 Sciarretta V, Pasquini E, Farneti G, Frank G, Mazzatenta D, Calbucci F. Endoscopic sinus surgery for the treatment of vascular tumors.  Am J Rhinol. 2006;  20 426-431
• 4 Kassam A B, Mintz A H, Gardner P A, Horowitz M B, Carrau R L, Snyderman C H. The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  59 (1) ONSE 162-165 discussion ONSE162-165
• 5 Cheng W Y, Chao S C, Shen C C. Endoscopic microvascular decompression of the hemifacial spasm.  Surg Neurol. 2008;  70 (S 01) 40-46
• 6 Pletcher S D, Metson R. Endoscopic optic nerve decompression for nontraumatic optic neuropathy.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;  133 780-783
• 7 Kassam A B, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report.  Neurosurgery. 2005;  57 (1) E213 discussion E213
• 8 Alfieri A, Jho H D, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;  144 219-225 discussion 225
• 9 Gardner P A, Prevedello D M, Kassam A B, Snyderman C H, Carrau R L, Mintz A H. The evolution of the endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas.  J Neurosurg. 2008;  108 1043-1047
• 10 Kennedy D W. Technical innovations and the evolution of endoscopic sinus surgery.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2006;  196 3-12
• 11 Xia T, Baird C, Jallo G et al.. An integrated system for planning, navigation and robotic assistance for skull base surgery.  Int J Med Robot. 2008;  4 321-330
• 12 Pillai P, Baig M N, Karas C S, Ammirati M. Endoscopic image-guided transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomic study comparing surgical exposure and surgical freedom obtained with the endoscope and the operating microscope.  Neurosurgery. 2009;  64 (5) 437-442 discussion 442-444
• 13 Weinstein G S, O'Malley Jr B W, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;  133 1220-1226
• 14 O'Malley Jr B W, Weinstein G S. Robotic skull base surgery: preclinical investigations to human clinical application.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;  133 1215-1219
• 15 O'Malley Jr B W, Weinstein G S. Robotic anterior and midline skull base surgery: preclinical investigations.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;  69 (2) S125-S128
• 16 Lee J YK, Lega B, Bhowmick D et al.. Da Vinci robot-assisted transoral odontoidectomy for basilar invagination.  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2010;  72 (2) 91-95
• 17 Lee J YK, O' Malley Jr B W, Newman J G et al.. Transoral robotic surgery of the skull base: a cadaver and feasibility study.  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2010;  72 (4) 181-187
• 18 Lee J YK, O'Malley Jr B W, Newman J G et al.. Transoral robotic surgery of craniocervical junction and atlantoaxial spine: a cadaveric study.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;  12 13-18
• 19 Axlund T W, Behrend E N, Sorjonen D C, Simpson S T, Kemppainen R J. Canine hypophysectomy using a ventral paramedian approach.  Vet Surg. 2005;  34 179-189
• 20 Zawawi K H, Al-Badawi E A, Lobo S L, Melis M, Mehta N R. An index for the measurement of normal maximum mouth opening.  J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;  69 737-741
• 21 Zacharek M A, Han J K, Allen R, Weissman J L, Hwang P H. Sagittal and coronal dimensions of the ethmoid roof: a radioanatomic study.  Am J Rhinol. 2005;  19 348-352
• 22 Lebowitz R A, Terk A, Jacobs J B, Holliday R A. Asymmetry of the ethmoid roof: analysis using coronal computed tomography.  Laryngoscope. 2001;  111 2122-2124
• 23 Arikan O K, Unal B, Kazkayasi M, Koc C. The analysis of anterior skull base from two different perspectives: coronal and reconstructed sagittal computed tomography.  Rhinology. 2005;  43 115-120
• 24 de Almeida J R, Zanation A M, Snyderman C H et al.. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine.  Laryngoscope. 2009;  119 239-244
• 25 Baird C J, Conway J E, Sciubba D M, Prevedello D M, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Kassam A B. Radiographic and anatomic basis of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: a comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches.  Neurosurgery. 2009;  65 (6) 158-163 discussion 63-64
• 26 Menezes A H. Surgical approaches: postoperative care and complications “transoral-transpalatopharyngeal approach to the craniocervical junction.”  Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;  24 1187-1193
• 27 Menezes A H, VanGilder J C. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten-year experience with 72 patients.  J Neurosurg. 1988;  69 895-903
• 28 Perrini P, Benedetto N, Guidi E, Lorenzo N D. Transoral approach and its superior extensions to the craniovertebral junction malformations: surgical strategies and results.  Neurosurgery. 2009;  March 11 [Epub ahead of Print]
• 29 Hadley M N, Spetzler R F, Sonntag V KH. The transoral approach to the superior cervical spine. A review of 53 cases of extradural cervicomedullary compression.  J Neurosurg. 1989;  71 16-23
• 30 Jones D C, Hayter J P, Vaughan E D, Findlay G FG. Oropharyngeal morbidity following transoral approaches to the upper cervical spine.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;  27 295-298
• 31 Safdar N, Bradley E A. The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus.  Am J Med. 2008;  121 310-315
• 32 Davis K A, Stewart J J, Crouch H K, Florez C E, Hospenthal D R. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection.  Clin Infect Dis. 2004;  39 776-782
• 33 Smith A J, Robertson D, Tang M K, Jackson M S, MacKenzie D, Bagg J. Staphylococcus aureus in the oral cavity: a three-year retrospective analysis of clinical laboratory data.  Br Dent J. 2003;  195 701-703 discussion 694
• 34 Rose-Innes A P, Oosthuizen J H. The transoral transpalatal approach to the pituitary fossa.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1995;  38 22-26