Rhytidectomy: Principles and Practice Emphasizing Safety

ABSTRACT

There is an unprecedented acceptance of rhytidectomy by today's society. No longer limited to the affluent few, middle class citizens are devoting their expendable income to achieve a more youthful appearance that is natural and inconspicuous. Despite recent difficult economic times, the mindset of the working population continues to be welcoming of rhytidectomy as a way to achieve a refreshed look while expecting minimal downtime and morbidity. To achieve these results, the current literature has described an array of techniques; however, there is no consensus on a preferred method, which reflects limitations and advantages inherent to every style of face-lifting. Each individual patient will have specific needs, and it is key for the facial plastic surgeon to select a technique that can address those areas most affected by the aging process. Whichever method used, an emphasis on safety is of the utmost importance. A solid understanding of the relevant anatomy is imperative as is the awareness of how to best avoid complications. Rhytidectomy can be a challenging procedure, and although complications are fortunately rare, they can be cosmetically devastating and poorly accepted by the elective cosmetic patient. This article aims at providing a summary of the history, the anatomy, and the currently accepted methods in rhytidectomy, emphasizing principles and practices of safety.

KEYWORDS

Rhytidectomy - safety - face-lift

REFERENCES

• 1 Perkins S W, Naderi S. Rhytidectomy. In: Patel I D, ed. Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2008: 207-225
• 2 Zimbler M S. Tord Skoog: face-lift innovator.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;  3 63
• 3 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;  58 80-88
• 4 Paul M D, Calvert J W, Evans G RD. The evolution of the midface lift in aesthetic plastic surgery.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 1809-1827
• 5 Tessier P. Face lifting and frontal rhytidectomy. In: Ely J F, ed. Transactions of the International Symposium on Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Cartgraft, Rio de Janeiro. 1979: 393
• 6 Hamra S T. The deep-plane rhytidectomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;  86 53-61 discussion 62-63
• 7 Hamra S T. Composite rhytidectomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  90 1-13
• 8 Scarborough D, Bisaccia E. The Webster-type face and neck lift: an extensive cervico-facial rhytidectomy employing a minimally invasive technique.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 747-755
• 9 Tonnard P, Verpaele A. The MACS-lift short scar rhytidectomy.  Aesthet Surg J. 2007;  27 188-198
• 10 Gonzalez-Ulloa M, Flores E S. Senility of the face: basic study to understand its causes and effects.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;  36 239-246
• 11 Psillakis J M, Rumley T O, Camargos A. Subperiosteal approach as an improved concept for correction of the aging face.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  82 383-394
• 12 Gilchrest B A. Physiologic and pathologic alterations in old skin. In: Platt D, ed. Geriatrics. 3rd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1984: 283-299
• 13 Gilchrest B A. Skin aging and photoaging: an overview.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;  21 (3 Pt 2) 610-613
• 14 Shumrick K A, Campbell A, Becker F. Nasal reconstruction in the elderly patient. The case for not letting age determine method.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;  1 297-301
• 15 Griffin J E, Jo C. Complications after superficial plane cervicofacial rhytidectomy: a retrospective analysis of 178 consecutive facelifts and review of the literature.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;  65 2227-2234
• 16 Baker D C, Stefani W A, Chiu E S. Reducing the incidence of hematoma requiring surgical evacuation following male rhytidectomy: a 30-year review of 985 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 1973-1985 discussion 1986-1987
• 17 Stuzin J M, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto H K, Wolfe S A. Anatomy of the frontal branch of the facial nerve: the significance of the temporal fat pad.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  83 265-271
• 18 Trussler A P, Stephan P, Hatef D, Schaverien M, Meade R, Barton F E. The frontal branch of the facial nerve across the zygomatic arch: anatomical relevance of the high-SMAS technique.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;  125 1221-1229
• 19 Ishikawa Y. An anatomical study on the distribution of the temporal branch of the facial nerve.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1990;  18 287-292
• 20 Gosain A K. Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve.  Clin Plast Surg. 1995;  22 241-251
• 21 Furnas D W. Landmarks for the trunk and the temporofacial division of the facial nerve.  Br J Surg. 1965;  52 694-696
• 22 Accioli de Vasconcellos J J, Britto J A, Henin D, Vacher C. The fascial planes of the temple and face: an en-bloc anatomical study and a plea for consistency.  Br J Plast Surg. 2003;  56 623-629
• 23 Agarwal C A, Mendenhall III S D, Foreman K B, Owsley J Q. The course of the frontal branch of the facial nerve in relation to fascial planes: an anatomic study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;  125 532-537
• 24 Dingman R O, Grabb W C. Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve based on the dissection of 100 facial halves.  Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962;  29 266-272
• 25 Wilhelmi B J, Mowlavi A, Neumeister M W. The safe face lift with bony anatomic landmarks to elevate the SMAS.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 1723-1726
• 26 Stuzin J M, Baker T J, Gordon H L. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to rhytidectomy and aging.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  89 441-449 discussion 450-451
• 27 Ghassemi A, Prescher A, Riediger D, Axer H. Anatomy of the SMAS revisited.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;  27 258-264
• 28 Furnas D W. The retaining ligaments of the cheek.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  83 11-16
• 29 Har-Shai Y, Sela E, Rubinstien I, Lindenbaum E S, Mitz V, Hirshowitz B. Computerized morphometric quantitation of elastin and collagen in SMAS and facial skin and the possible role of fat cells in SMAS viscoelastic properties.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102 2466-2470
• 30 Saulis A S, Lautenschlager E P, Mustoe T A. Biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of skin, SMAS, and composite flaps as they pertain to rhytidectomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 590-598 discussion 599-600
• 31 Whetzel T P, Stevenson T R. The contribution of the SMAS to the blood supply in the lateral face lift flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 1011-1018
• 32 Whetzel T P, Mathes S J. The arterial supply of the face lift flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 480-486 discussion 487-488
• 33 Schuster R H, Gamble W B, Hamra S T, Manson P N. A comparison of flap vascular anatomy in three rhytidectomy techniques.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95 683-690
• 34 Schaverien M V, Pessa J E, Saint-Cyr M, Rohrich R J. The arterial and venous anatomies of the lateral face lift flap and the SMAS.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  123 1581-1587
• 35 Webster R C. Conservative facelift surgery.  Arch Laryngol. 1976;  102 657-682
• 36 Webster R C, Brown C A, Hilger P A, Smith R C. Comparison between short and long term results in face lifts.  Aesthetic Reconstr Facial Plast Surg. 1978;  5 1-98
• 37 Cohen S R, Webster R C. “How I do it”—head and neck and plastic surgery. A targeted problem and its solution. Primary rhytidectomy—complications of the procedure and anesthetic.  Laryngoscope. 1983;  93 654-656
• 38 Mowlavi A, Wilhelmi B J. The extended SMAS facelift: identifying the lateral zygomaticus major muscle border using bony anatomic landmarks.  Ann Plast Surg. 2004;  52 353-357
• 39 Baker D. Rhytidectomy with lateral SMASectomy.  Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  16 209-213
• 40 Webster R C, Smith R C, Papsidero M J, Karolow W W, Smith K F. Comparison of SMAS plication with SMAS imbrication in face lifting.  Laryngoscope. 1982;  92 (8 Pt 1) 901-912
• 41 Ivy E J, Lorenc Z P, Aston S J. Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;  98 1135-1143 discussion 1144-1147
• 42 Godin M S, Johnson Jr C M. Deep-plane/composite rhytidectomy.  Facial Plast Surg. 1996;  12 231-239
• 43 Gentile R D. Subperiosteal deep plane rhytidectomy: the composite midface lift.  Facial Plast Surg. 2005;  21 286-295
• 44 Ghali G E, Smith B R. A case for superficial rhytidectomy.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;  56 349-351
• 45 Alpert B S, Baker D C, Hamra S T, Owsley J Q, Ramirez O. Identical twin face lifts with differing techniques: a 10-year follow-up.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;  123 1025-1033 discussion 1034-1036
• 46 Baker D C, Conley J. Avoiding facial nerve injuries in rhytidectomy. Anatomical variations and pitfalls.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;  64 781-795
• 47 Rees T D, Liverett D M, Guy C L. The effect of cigarette smoking on skin-flap survival in the face lift patient.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;  73 911-915
• 48 Jones B M, Grover R. Reducing complications in cervicofacial rhytidectomy by tumescent infiltration: a comparative trial evaluating 678 consecutive face lifts.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 398-403
• 49 Jones B M, Grover R. Avoiding hematoma in cervicofacial rhytidectomy: a personal 8 year quest. Reviewing 910 patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113 381-387
• 50 Lee S, Pham A M, Pryor S G, Tollefson T, Sykes J M. Efficacy of Crosseal fibrin sealant (human) in rhytidectomy.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;  11 29-33
• 51 Campanile G, Hautmann G, Lotti T. Cigarette smoking, wound healing and face-lift.  Clin Dermatol. 1998;  16 575-578