Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60(03): 189-194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1271042
Original Cardiovascular
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Aortic Arch Repair: Let It Beat!

A. Rüffer
1   Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
C. Klopsch
2   Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
,
F. Münch
1   Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
U. Gottschalk
3   Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University-Heart-Center-Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
T. S. Mir
3   Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University-Heart-Center-Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
J. Weil
3   Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University-Heart-Center-Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
H. C. Reichenspurner
4   Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University-Heart-Center-Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
R. A. Cesnjevar
1   Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 December 2010

18 March 2011

Publication Date:
28 April 2011 (online)

Abstract

Objective Aortic arch repair (AAR) on the beating heart may reduce cross-clamping times and offer improved postoperative cardiac function.

Methods A single-center review of all patients (n = 24) who underwent surgical AAR during biventricular repair between 01/2006 and 01/2008 was done. All patients were operated on under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP). During AAR, 13 patients (group 1) received cardioplegic arrest, and were compared to 11 patients (group 2) who underwent a beating-heart modification with selective myocardial perfusion. Seventeen patients had additional intracardiac lesions and underwent simultaneous correction during the procedure.

Results Durations of CPB, AAR and ACP did not differ statistically between groups. Cardioplegic arrest time was significantly lower in group 1 (34 ±  13 vs. 76 ±  11 min, p = 0.02) and resulted in a subsequent reduction of myocardial ischemic damage as borne out by lower postoperative levels of troponin T and CK-MB (2.5 ±  0.7 vs. 7.1 ±  1.4 ng/mL, p = 0.02; 68.7 ±  11.5 vs. 149.1 ±  27.2 U/l, p = 0.03). We observed an enhanced patient recovery with shorter inotropic and ventilatory support times (p < 0.05).

Conclusion Pediatric aortic arch correction on a CPB beating heart with selective myocardial perfusion is technically feasible and safe. The reduction of the myocardial ischemic time is effective and results in less myocardial damage.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ishino K, Kawada M, Irie H, Kino K, Sano S. Single-stage repair of aortic coarctation with ventricular septal defect using isolated cerebral and myocardial perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 17: 538-542
  • 2 Ishino K, Sano S. Aortic arch repair with a working beating heart in premature infants. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 1653-1654
  • 3 Karl TR, Sano S, Brawn W, Mee RB. Repair of hypoplastic or interrupted aortic arch via sternotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 104: 688-695
  • 4 Kotani Y, Ishino K, Kasahara S , et al. Continuous cerebral and myocardial perfusion during aortic arch repair in neonates and infants. ASAIO J 2006; 52: 536-538
  • 5 Lim C, Kim WH, Kim SC , et al. Aortic arch reconstruction using regional perfusion without circulatory arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 23: 149-155
  • 6 Lim HG, Kim WH, Jang WS , et al. One-stage total repair of aortic arch anomaly using regional perfusion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31: 242-248
  • 7 Masuda Z, Ishino K, Kato G , et al. [Isolated cerebral and myocardial perfusion during aortic arch repair in neonates]. J Cardiol 2001; 38: 163-168
  • 8 Ozkara A, Cetin G, Tireli E , et al. Off pump repair of aortic arch anomalies with concomitant intracardiac defects via anterior approach. J Card Surg 2006; 21: 550-552
  • 9 Photiadis J, Asfour B, Sinzobahamvya N , et al. Improved hemodynamics and outcome after modified Norwood operation on the beating heart. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 976-981
  • 10 Sano S, Mee RB. Isolated myocardial perfusion during arch repair. Ann Thorac Surg 1990; 49: 970-972
  • 11 Kostelka M, Walther T, Geerdts I , et al. Primary repair for aortic arch obstruction associated with ventricular septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1989-1993
  • 12 Lacour-Gayet F, Clarke D, Jacobs J , et al. The Aristotle score: a complexity-adjusted method to evaluate surgical results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 911-924
  • 13 Rubio A, Hakami L, Munch F , et al. Noninvasive control of adequate cerebral oxygenation during low-flow antegrade selective cerebral perfusion on adults and infants in the aortic arch surgery. J Card Surg 2008; 23: 474-479
  • 14 Pigula FA, Nemoto EM, Griffith BP, Siewers RD. Regional low-flow perfusion provides cerebral circulatory support during neonatal aortic arch reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 331-339
  • 15 Münch F, Vestweber-Wilmes E, Bretzger J. “MUF-DeLuxe“-Erlanger Verfahren der modifizierten Ultrafiltration. Kardiotechnik 2003; 12: 138-141
  • 16 Asou T, Kado H, Imoto Y , et al. Selective cerebral perfusion technique during aortic arch repair in neonates. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 1546-1548
  • 17 Fraser Jr CD, Andropoulos DB. Principles of antegrade cerebral perfusion during arch reconstruction in newborns/infants. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 2008; 11: 61-68
  • 18 Roerick O, Seitz T, Mauser-Weber P , et al. Low-flow perfusion via the innominate artery during aortic arch operations provides only limited somatic circulatory support. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29: 517-524
  • 19 Ou P, Mousseaux E, Celermajer DS , et al. Aortic arch shape deformation after coarctation surgery: effect on blood pressure response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132: 1105-1111
  • 20 McCrindle BW, Tchervenkov CI, Konstantinov IE , et al. Risk factors associated with mortality and interventions in 472 neonates with interrupted aortic arch: a Congenital Heart Surgeons Society study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 343-350