Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Der Marathonlauf wird immer populärer und bei dem verbreiteten sitzenden Lebenswandel
sind die positiven Auswirkungen auf Stoffwechsel und Herz-Kreislauf-system unbestritten.
Unklar ist jedoch die Frage nach vorzeitigem Gelenk- und Sehnenverschleiß. Es wurden
geübte und ungeübte Läufer in der Vorbereitungszeit und direkt nach einem Marathonlauf
MR-tomografisch und klinisch untersucht, um eventuelle Schäden an Achillessehne (AS)
und Rückfuß zu beurteilen. Material und Methode: Prospektive Beobachtungsstudie einer Kohorte von 73 Läufern aus den Anmeldungen zu
einem Stadtlauf. Die Teilnehmer wurden vor Beginn des Trainings, gegen Ende des Trainings
und direkt (maximal 72 Stunden) nach einem Marathonlauf klinisch-orthopädisch und
kernspintomografisch mit 2 geblindeten Beurteilern auf Veränderungen an AS und Rückfuß
untersucht. Die Zielgrößen waren Läsionen mit Signalsteigerung in der STIR-Wichtung.
Die Ergebnisse wurden zwischen den Subgruppen der Läufer verglichen, außerdem wurde
eine Faktorenanalyse durchgeführt. Jeweils wurde bei p ≤ 0,05 von Signifikanz ausgegangen.
Ergebnisse: Es wurden 32 Frauen und 41 Männer eingeschlossen, von denen 53 die geplante Distanz
liefen (Finisher), während 20 als Nonfinisher vorzeitig abbrachen. Es gab 28 erfahrene
und 25 unerfahrene Läufer, 14 Läufer hatten Fußbeschwerden während des Trainings und
13 während des Marathons. Es war eine signifikante positive Korrelation zwischen AS-Durchmesser
und Gewicht (r = 0,37) bzw. Körpergröße (r = 0,34), aber eine negative Korrelation
zwischen Körpergröße und Signalintensität des Kalkaneus (r = −0,50) festzustellen.
Der Mittelwert der Signalintensität der asymptomatischen AS nahm im Training ab. Es
kam nach dem Lauf zu einer Zunahme des mittleren Volumens der Bursa retrocalcanea
sowie des mittleren Läsionsvolumens in der AS, das mittlere MR-Signal im Kalkaneus
nahm ab. Die Interraterreliabilität der Messungen war mittelgradig bis exzellent.
Schlussfolgerung: Ein planmäßiges Training auf einen Marathonlauf erlaubt eine Adaptation der muskuloskeletalen
Strukturen an die zunehmende Belastung. Es wurden weder in der Vorbereitung noch direkt
nach dem Marathon regelhafte neue Schäden festgestellt.
Abstract
Background: Marathon running is gaining in popularity. Its benefits regarding the cardiovascular
system as well as the metabolism are beyond doubt. However, whether or not there are
detrimental side effects to the musculoskeletal system such as wear and tear is an
unsolved question. We therefore prospectively looked at beginners and experienced
runners at a city marathon during training and after the competition for lesions to
the Achilles tendon (AT) or hindfoot. Material and Method: 73 healthy subjects were prospectively included in our study. They were recruited
from the applicants of the city marathon or half-marathon. They underwent an initial
clinical orthopaedic as well as three magnetic resonance (MRI) examinations. The MRI
were conducted at the time point of study enrolment, near the end of training and
directly (up to 72 hours) after the run. MRI evaluation (fat saturated T2 -weighted sagittal STIR sequence) was performed by two independent experienced radiologists
blinded to the clinical context. The results were compared for subgroups of runners,
also a factorial analysis was performed. Statistical results were deemed significant
for p ≤ 0.05. Results: 32 women and 41 men were included. In the end there were 53 finishers and 20 non-finishers;
28 seasoned runners and 25 novices. 57 runners had no foot complaints, while 14 had
foot pain during training and 13 during the marathon. Mean body weight was 71.6 kg,
height was 173 cm, age was 40.2 years. Mean AT diameter was 7.0 mm and showed no change
during training or after the marathon. There was no significant influence of gender
on other variables investigated. There was a significant and positive correlation
between AT diameter and weight (r = 0.37), also AT and height (r = 0.34), while there
was negative correlation between height and signal intensity of calcaneus (r = −0.50).
The signal intensity of the AT decreased during training. The signal intensity of
the calcaneus decreased from inclusion until after the marathon, while the mean retrocalcanear
bursa volume and AT lesion volume increased. Some of the non-finishers stopped the
training because of orthopaedic symptoms. These runners generally had an apparent
lesion visible in their initial MRI examination. Regarding the factorial analysis
of the data, there were no risk factors predicting non-finishing or development of
new lesions to be detected. Interrater reliability was moderate for retrocalcanear
bursa, while it was good to excellent for AT diameter and calcaneus MR signal intensity.
Conclusion: In our sample of primarily asymptomatic German runners, the AT diameter was higher
than in symptomatic American patients. The diameter did not change during training
or after the marathon. Non-finishers with orthopaedic reasons generally had a lesion
on MRI in the initial examination. Apart from this, no new lesions to the AT or hindfoot
are to be expected during normal training. Adaptive processes seem to be the main
effect of this training.
Schlüsselwörter
Achillessehne - Marathon - degeneration - MRT - Bursitis
Key words
Achilles tendon - marathon - degeneration - MRI - bursitis
Literatur
1
Ziegler M, Braumann K M, Reer R.
Joggen – Schwimmen – Treppensteigen: So schützt regelmässiges Training Herz und Kreislauf.
[The role of jogging in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease].
MMW Fortschritte der Medizin.
2004;
146
29-32
2
Krampla W W, Newrkla S P, Kroener A H et al.
Changes on magnetic resonance tomography in the knee joints of marathon runners: a
10-year longitudinal study.
Skeletal Radiol.
2008;
37
619-626
3
Rees J D, Wilson A M, Wolman R L.
Current concepts in the management of tendon disorders.
Rheumatology (Oxford, England).
2006;
45
508-521
4
Shalabi A, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M, Aspelin P et al.
Immediate Achilles tendon response after strength training evaluated by MRI.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
2004;
36
1841-1846
5
Wilder R P, Sethi S.
Overuse injuries: tendinopathies, stress fractures, compartment syndrome, and shin
splints.
Clin Sports Med.
2004;
23
55-81
vi
6
Alfredson H, Pietila T, Jonsson P et al.
Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis.
Am J Sports Med.
1998;
26
360-366
7
Collins M S.
Imaging evaluation of chronic ankle and hindfoot pain in athletes.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am.
2008;
16
39-58
v-vi
8
Reiter M, Ulreich N, Dirisamer A et al.
Panorama-Ultraschall in der Abklärung symptomatischer Achillessehnenerkrankungen:
ein Vergleich zur MRT. [Extended field-of-view sonography in Achilles tendon disease:
a comparison with MR imaging].
Fortschr Roentgenstr.
2004;
176
704-708
9
Schweitzer M E, Karasick D.
MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon.
AJR.
2000;
175
613-625
10
Shalabi A, Svensson L, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M et al.
Tendon injury and repair after core biopsies in chronic Achilles tendinosis evaluated
by serial magnetic resonance imaging.
Br J Sports Med.
2004;
38
606-612
11
Bleakney R R, White L M.
Imaging of the Achilles tendon.
Foot Ankle Clin.
2005;
10
239-254
12
Shalabi A, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M, Papadogiannakis N et al.
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and histopathology in chronic achilles tendinosis.
A longitudinal MR study of 15 patients.
Acta Radiol.
2002;
43
198-206
13
Bencardino J, Rosenberg Z S, Delfaut E.
MR imaging in sports injuries of the foot and ankle.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am.
1999;
7
131-149
ix
14
Rosenberg Z S, Beltran J, Bencardino J T.
From the RSNA Refresher Courses. Radiological Society of North America. MR imaging
of the ankle and foot.
Radiographics.
2000;
20
S153-S179
15
Haims A H, Schweitzer M E, Patel R S et al.
MR imaging of the Achilles tendon: overlap of findings in symptomatic and asymptomatic
individuals.
Skeletal Radiology.
2000;
29
640-645
16
Schweitzer M E, White L M.
Does altered biomechanics cause marrow edema?.
Radiology.
1996;
198
851-853
17
Jones B H, Harris J M, Vinh T N et al.
Exercise-induced stress fractures and stress reactions of bone: epidemiology, etiology,
and classification.
Exerc Sport Sci Rev.
1989;
17
379-422
18
Milgrom C, Giladi M, Stein M et al.
Stress fractures in military recruits. A prospective study showing an unusually high
incidence.
J Bone Joint Surg [Br].
1985;
67
732-735
19
Sijbrandij E S, van Gils A P, de Lange E E.
Overuse and sports-related injuries of the ankle and hind foot: MR imaging findings.
Eur J Radiol.
2002;
43
45-56
20
Trappeniers L, De Maeseneer M, De Ridder F et al.
Can bone marrow edema be seen on STIR images of the ankle and foot after 1 week of
running?.
Eur J Radiol.
2003;
47
25-28
21
Bottger B A, Schweitzer M E, El-Noueam K I et al.
MR imaging of the normal and abnormal retrocalcaneal bursae.
AJR.
1998;
170
1239-1241
22
Krampla W, Mayrhofer R, Malcher J et al.
MR imaging of the knee in marathon runners before and after competition.
Skeletal Radiol.
2001;
30
72-76
23
Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schueller G, Uffmann M et al.
Does marathon running cause acute lesions of the knee? Evaluation with magnetic resonance
imaging.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
2179-2185
24
Lazzarini K M, Troiano R N, Smith R C.
Can running cause the appearance of marrow edema on MR images of the foot and ankle?.
Radiology.
1997;
202
540-542
25
Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Schwaighofer B, Gundry C et al.
Jogging causes acute changes in the knee joint: an MR study in normal volunteers.
AJR.
1990;
154
1233-1235
26
Soila K, Karjalainen P T, Aronen H J et al.
High-resolution MR imaging of the asymptomatic Achilles tendon: new observations.
AJR.
1999;
173
323-328
27
Nicholson C W, Berlet G C, Lee T H.
Prediction of the success of nonoperative treatment of insertional Achilles tendinosis
based on MRI.
Foot Ankle Int.
2007;
28
472-477
28
Lohman M, Kivisaari A, Vehmas T et al.
MRI abnormalities of foot and ankle in asymptomatic, physically active individuals.
Skeletal Radiology.
2001;
30
61-66
29
Khan K M, Forster B B, Robinson J et al.
Are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of value in assessment of Achilles tendon
disorders? A two year prospective study.
Br J Sports Med.
2003;
37
149-153
30
Shalabi A, Kristoffersen-Wiberg M, Aspelin P et al.
MR evaluation of chronic Achilles tendinosis. A longitudinal study of 15 patients
preoperatively and two years postoperatively.
Acta Radiol.
2001;
42
269-276
31
Schweitzer M E, van Leersum M, Ehrlich S S et al.
Fluid in normal and abnormal ankle joints: amount and distribution as seen on MR images.
AJR.
1994;
162
111-114
32 R_Development_Core_Team.. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Version 2.10.0. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009. http://www.r-project.org/
33
Bland J M, Altman D G.
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Lancet.
1986;
1
307-310
34
Jepsen J R, Laursen L H, Hagert C G et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of the neurological upper limb examination I: inter-rater reproducibility
of selected findings and patterns.
BMC Neurology.
2006;
6
8
35 Portney L G, Watkins M P. Correlations. In: Portney L G, Watkins M P, eds. Foundations
of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall
Health; 2000: 491-508
36
Ohberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H.
Eccentric training in patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis: normalised tendon
structure and decreased thickness at follow up.
Br J Sports Med.
2004;
38
8-11
37
Hansen P, Aagaard P, Kjaer M et al.
Effect of habitual running on human Achilles tendon load-deformation properties and
cross-sectional area.
J Appl Physiol.
2003;
95
2375-2380
38
Brushoj C, Henriksen B M, Albrecht-Beste E et al.
Reproducibility of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of tendon
size.
Acta Radiol.
2006;
47
954-959
39
Gardin A, Bruno J, Movin T et al.
Magnetic resonance signal, rather than tendon volume, correlates to pain and functional
impairment in chronic Achilles tendinopathy.
Acta Radiol.
2006;
47
718-724
Dr. Wolfgang Freund
Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Steinhövelstraße 9
89075 Ulm
Telefon: 07 31/50 06 10 04
Fax: 07 31/50 06 10 05
eMail: freund-ulm@t-online.de