Download PDF
Semin Liver Dis 2011; 31(1): 082-090
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1272836
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Assessment of Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Liver Biopsies: An Update

Giacomo Germani1 , Prodromos Hytiroglou3 , Anastasia Fotiadu3 , Andrew K. Burroughs1 , Amar P. Dhillon2
  • 1The Royal Free Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre and University Department of Surgery UCL, and Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Cellular Pathology, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
  • 3Department of Pathology, Aristotle University Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 February 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The liver biopsy specimen represents valuable material for the assessment of fibrosis and cirrhosis. Despite limitations related to sampling and interpretation, histologic examination remains the gold standard for staging chronic liver diseases. Hepatic fibrosis is currently viewed as a dynamic process that may often regress after successful treatment of chronic liver diseases. Even the excess fibrous tissue of cirrhotic livers may sometimes regress over time. Distinguishing between the amount of hepatic fibrosis and the disease stage is important for the assessment of the effects of antifibrotic treatments. Recent studies suggest that the proportion of the liver biopsy specimen occupied by collagen is correlated with the hepatic venous pressure gradient in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infection, with or without cirrhosis, and represents a predictor of clinical decompensation. This parameter has also been found to correlate with liver stiffness measurements of patients with chronic viral hepatitis obtained by transient elastography. Therefore, quantitative assessment of hepatic fibrosis in liver biopsy specimens holds promise as a prognostic marker, and as a means to validate noninvasive markers of fibrosis.

KEYWORDS

Biopsy - cirrhosis - collagen - fibrosis - hepatitis - liver - stage

REFERENCES

  • 1 Friedman S L. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 (6) 1655-1669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Anthony P P, Ishak K G, Nayak N C, Poulsen H E, Scheuer P J, Sobin L H. The morphology of cirrhosis: definition, nomenclature, and classification.  Bull World Health Organ. 1977;  55 (4) 521-540
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wanless I R. Vascular disorders. In: Burt A D, Portmann B C, Ferrell L D, eds. MacSween's Pathology of the Liver. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2007: 613-648
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Crawford J M. Evidence-based interpretation of liver biopsies.  Lab Invest. 2006;  86 (4) 326-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Garcia-Tsao G, Friedman S, Iredale J, Pinzani M. Now there are many (stages) where before there was one: In search of a pathophysiological classification of cirrhosis.  Hepatology. 2010;  51 (4) 1445-1449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Afdhal N H, Nunes D. Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 (6) 1160-1174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bedossa P, Poynard T. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group . An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C.  Hepatology. 1996;  24 (2) 289-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Colloredo G, Guido M, Sonzogni A, Leandro G. Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease.  J Hepatol. 2003;  39 (2) 239-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Goldin R D, Goldin J G, Burt A D et al.. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation in the histopathological assessment of chronic viral hepatitis.  J Hepatol. 1996;  25 (5) 649-654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Scheuer P J. Liver biopsy size matters in chronic hepatitis: bigger is better.  Hepatology. 2003;  38 (6) 1356-1358
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schiano T D, Azeem S, Bodian C A et al.. Importance of specimen size in accurate needle liver biopsy evaluation of patients with chronic hepatitis C.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 (9) 930-935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schlichting P, Hølund B, Poulsen H. Liver biopsy in chronic aggressive hepatitis. Diagnostic reproducibility in relation to size of specimen.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1983;  18 (1) 27-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bravo A A, Sheth S G, Chopra S. Liver biopsy.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  344 (7) 495-500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bedossa P, Dargère D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.  Hepatology. 2003;  38 (6) 1449-1457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Colombo M, Del Ninno E, de Franchis R et al.. Ultrasound-assisted percutaneous liver biopsy: superiority of the Tru-Cut over the Menghini needle for diagnosis of cirrhosis.  Gastroenterology. 1988;  95 (2) 487-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Vargas-Tank L, Martínez V, Jirón M I, Soto J R, Armas-Merino R. Tru-cut and Menghini needles: different yield in the histological diagnosis of liver disease.  Liver. 1985;  5 (3) 178-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Poynard T, McHutchison J, Manns M et al.. Impact of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  122 (5) 1303-1313
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dienstag J L, Goldin R D, Heathcote E J et al.. Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 (1) 105-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Czaja A J, Carpenter H A. Decreased fibrosis during corticosteroid therapy of autoimmune hepatitis.  J Hepatol. 2004;  40 (4) 646-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dixon J B, Bhathal P S, Hughes N R, O'Brien P E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Improvement in liver histological analysis with weight loss.  Hepatology. 2004;  39 (6) 1647-1654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Falize L, Guillygomarc'h A, Perrin M et al.. Reversibility of hepatic fibrosis in treated genetic hemochromatosis: a study of 36 cases.  Hepatology. 2006;  44 (2) 472-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bortolotti F, Guido M, Cadrobbi P et al.. Spontaneous regression of hepatitis B virus-associated cirrhosis developed in childhood.  Dig Liver Dis. 2005;  37 (12) 964-967
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Malekzadeh R, Mohamadnejad M, Rakhshani N et al.. Reversibility of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 (4) 344-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Serpaggi J, Carnot F, Nalpas B et al.. Direct and indirect evidence for the reversibility of cirrhosis.  Hum Pathol. 2006;  37 (12) 1519-1526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wanless I R, Nakashima E, Sherman M. Regression of human cirrhosis. Morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;  124 (11) 1599-1607
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Knodell R G, Ishak K G, Black W C et al.. Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis.  Hepatology. 1981;  1 (5) 431-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Scheuer P J. Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need for reassessment.  J Hepatol. 1991;  13 (3) 372-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ludwig J. The nomenclature of chronic active hepatitis: an obituary.  Gastroenterology. 1993;  105 (1) 274-278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Desmet V J, Gerber M, Hoofnagle J H, Manns M, Scheuer P J. Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging.  Hepatology. 1994;  19 (6) 1513-1520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hytiroglou P, Thung S N, Gerber M A. Histological classification and quantitation of the severity of chronic hepatitis: keep it simple!.  Semin Liver Dis. 1995;  15 (4) 414-421
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L et al.. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis.  J Hepatol. 1995;  22 (6) 696-699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Germani G, Burroughs A K, Dhillon A P. The relationship between liver disease stage and liver fibrosis: a tangled web.  Histopathology. 2010;  57 (6) 773-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lagging L M, Westin J, Svensson E et al.. Progression of fibrosis in untreated patients with hepatitis C virus infection.  Liver. 2002;  22 (2) 136-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Scheuer P J, Standish R A, Dhillon A P. Scoring of chronic hepatitis.  Clin Liver Dis. 2002;  6 (2) 335-347 v-vi
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Brunt E M, Janney C G, Di Bisceglie A M, Neuschwander-Tetri B A, Bacon B R. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for grading and staging the histological lesions.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 (9) 2467-2474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies.  J Hepatol. 2006;  44 (1) 217-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Burroughs A K, Cholongitas E. Non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis: encouraging or discouraging results?.  J Hepatol. 2007;  46 (5) 751-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Castera L, Forns X, Alberti A. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography.  J Hepatol. 2008;  48 (5) 835-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Standish R A, Cholongitas E, Dhillon A, Burroughs A K, Dhillon A P. An appraisal of the histopathological assessment of liver fibrosis.  Gut. 2006;  55 (4) 569-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Puchtler H, Meloan S N, Waldrop F S. Are picro-dye reactions for collagens quantitative? Chemical and histochemical considerations.  Histochemistry. 1988;  88 (3–6) 243-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Rojkind M, Ponce-Noyola P. The extracellular matrix of the liver.  Coll Relat Res. 1982;  2 (2) 151-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Jimenez W, Parés A, Caballería J et al.. Measurement of fibrosis in needle liver biopsies: evaluation of a colorimetric method.  Hepatology. 1985;  5 (5) 815-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 López-De León A, Rojkind M. A simple micromethod for collagen and total protein determination in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections.  J Histochem Cytochem. 1985;  33 (8) 737-743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 James J, Bosch K S, Aronson D C, Houtkooper J M. Sirius red histophotometry and spectrophotometry of sections in the assessment of the collagen content of liver tissue and its application in growing rat liver.  Liver. 1990;  10 (1) 1-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Calvaruso V, Burroughs A K, Standish R et al.. Computer-assisted image analysis of liver collagen: relationship to Ishak scoring and hepatic venous pressure gradient.  Hepatology. 2009;  49 (4) 1236-1244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Duchatelle V, Marcellin P, Giostra E et al.. Changes in liver fibrosis at the end of alpha interferon therapy and 6 to 18 months later in patients with chronic hepatitis C: quantitative assessment by a morphometric method.  J Hepatol. 1998;  29 (1) 20-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kage M, Shimamatu K, Nakashima E, Kojiro M, Inoue O, Yano M. Long-term evolution of fibrosis from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis C: morphometric analysis of repeated biopsies.  Hepatology. 1997;  25 (4) 1028-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Nohlgård C, Rubio C A, Kock Y, Hammar H. Liver fibrosis quantified by image analysis in methotrexate-treated patients with psoriasis.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;  28 (1) 40-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 O'Brien M J, Keating N M, Elderiny S et al.. An assessment of digital image analysis to measure fibrosis in liver biopsy specimens of patients with chronic hepatitis C.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;  114 (5) 712-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Pilette C, Rousselet M C, Bedossa P et al.. Histopathological evaluation of liver fibrosis: quantitative image analysis vs semi-quantitative scores. Comparison with serum markers.  J Hepatol. 1998;  28 (3) 439-446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Fontana R J, Goodman Z D, Dienstag J L HALT-C Trial Group et al. Relationship of serum fibrosis markers with liver fibrosis stage and collagen content in patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C.  Hepatology. 2008;  47 (3) 789-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hui A Y, Liew C T, Go M Y et al.. Quantitative assessment of fibrosis in liver biopsies from patients with chronic hepatitis B.  Liver Int. 2004;  24 (6) 611-618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lazzarini A L, Levine R A, Ploutz-Snyder R J, Sanderson S O. Advances in digital quantification technique enhance discrimination between mild and advanced liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.  Liver Int. 2005;  25 (6) 1142-1149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Levine R A, Sanderson S O, Ploutz-Snyder R et al.. Assessment of fibrosis progression in untreated Irish women with chronic hepatitis C contracted from immunoglobulin anti-D.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 (10) 1271-1277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Maduli E, Andorno S, Rigamonti C et al.. Evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C with a computer-assisted morphometric method.  Ann Ital Med Int. 2002;  17 (4) 242-247
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Manabe N, Chevallier M, Chossegros P et al.. Interferon-alpha 2b therapy reduces liver fibrosis in chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis: a quantitative histological evaluation.  Hepatology. 1993;  18 (6) 1344-1349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Chevallier M, Guerret S, Chossegros P, Gerard F, Grimaud J A. A histological semiquantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: comparison with morphometric studies.  Hepatology. 1994;  20 (2) 349-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Caballero T, Pérez-Milena A, Masseroli M et al.. Liver fibrosis assessment with semiquantitative indexes and image analysis quantification in sustained-responder and non-responder interferon-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C.  J Hepatol. 2001;  34 (5) 740-747
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Sakaida I, Nagatomi A, Hironaka K, Uchida K, Okita K. Quantitative analysis of liver fibrosis and stellate cell changes in patients with chronic hepatitis C after interferon therapy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 (2) 489-496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Goodman Z D, Becker Jr R L, Pockros P J, Afdhal N H. Progression of fibrosis in advanced chronic hepatitis C: evaluation by morphometric image analysis.  Hepatology. 2007;  45 (4) 886-894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Triantos C K, Nikolopoulou V, Burroughs A K. Review article: the therapeutic and prognostic benefit of portal pressure reduction in cirrhosis.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;  28 (8) 943-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Armonis A, Patch D, Burroughs A. Hepatic venous pressure measurement: an old test as a new prognostic marker in cirrhosis?.  Hepatology. 1997;  25 (1) 245-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Burroughs A K, Groszmann R, Bosch J et al.. Assessment of therapeutic benefit of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C: is hepatic venous pressure gradient a better end point?.  Gut. 2002;  50 (3) 425-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Burroughs A K, Thalheimer U. Hepatic venous pressure gradient in 2010: optimal measurement is key.  Hepatology. 2010;  51 (6) 1894-1896
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Manolakopoulos S, Triantos C, Theodoropoulos J et al.. Antiviral therapy reduces portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis due to HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B and significant portal hypertension.  J Hepatol. 2009;  51 (3) 468-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G Portal Hypertension Collaborative Group et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 (2) 481-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Blasco A, Forns X, Carrión J A et al.. Hepatic venous pressure gradient identifies patients at risk of severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.  Hepatology. 2006;  43 (3) 492-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Samonakis D et al.. Clinical outcome of HCV-related graft cirrhosis and prognostic value of hepatic venous pressure gradient.  Transpl Int. 2009;  22 (2) 172-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Samonakis D N, Cholongitas E, Thalheimer U et al.. Hepatic venous pressure gradient to assess fibrosis and its progression after liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis.  Liver Transpl. 2007;  13 (9) 1305-1311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 van Leeuwen D J, Sherlock S, Scheuer P J, Dick R. Wedged hepatic venous pressure recording and venography for the assessment of pre-cirrhotic and cirrhotic liver disease.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989;  24 (1) 65-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Manousou P, Burroughs A, Isgro G et al.. Computer assisted image analysis of liver collagen at one year biopsy can predict clinical outcome in HCV post LT patients.  Hepatology. 2009;  50 (S4) 302A-303A
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Isgro G, Calvaruso V, Manousou P et al.. Correlation of Ishak stage, transient elastography, HVPG and collagen proportionate area in HCV transplanted patients.  Hepatology. 2009;  50 (S4) 481A-482A
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Nitta Y, Kawabe N, Hashimoto S et al.. Liver stiffness measured by transient elastography correlates with fibrosis area in liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.  Hepatol Res. 2009;  39 (7) 675-684
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Ziol M, Kettaneh A, Ganne-Carrié N, Barget N, Tengher-Barna I, Beaugrand M. Relationships between fibrosis amounts assessed by morphometry and liver stiffness measurements in chronic hepatitis or steatohepatitis.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  21 (11) 1261-1268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Kutami R, Girgrah N, Wanless I et al.. The Laennec grading system for assessment of hepatic fibrosis: validation by correlation with wedged hepatic vein pressure and clinical features.  Hepatology. 2000;  32 407A
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Nagula S, Jain D, Groszmann R J, Garcia-Tsao G. Histological-hemodynamic correlation in cirrhosis-a histological classification of the severity of cirrhosis.  J Hepatol. 2006;  44 (1) 111-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Kumar M, Sakhuja P, Kumar A et al.. Histological subclassification of cirrhosis based on histological-haemodynamic correlation.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;  27 (9) 771-779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Viola A, Jain D, Garcia-Tsao G. Quantitative histological assessment in cirrhosis: septal thickness predicts clinical decompensation.  J Hepatol. 2009;  50 (Suppl 1) S94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Calvaruso V, Grillo F, Manousou P et al.. Liver collagen proportionate area and hepatic venous pressure gradient to sub-classify cirrhosis: proof of concept in HCV infected liver transplant recipients with allograft cirrhosis.  Hepatology. 2008;  48 (Suppl 1) 1043A
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Germani G, Dhillon A, Andreana L et al.. Histological subclassification of cirrhosis.  Hepatology. 2010;  52 (2) 804-805
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Amar Paul DhillonM.D. 

Department of Cellular Pathology, UCL Medical School

Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK

Email: a.dhillon@medsch.ucl.ac.uk

      >