Re-operations for Hirschsprung’s Disease: Long-term Complications

Abstract

Introduction:

In some patients with Hirschsprung’s disease (HD), the initial surgical procedure fails, and the patients suffer from repeated or persistent symptoms. These patients complain of severe inflammation, intestinal obstruction, fecal or urinary incontinence, abdominal pain or dystrophy. However, little data has been published on the long-term follow-up results after re-operations for HD.

Materials and Methods:

We followed 8 cases between 2004 and 2006, of complicated HD requiring repeated surgery and recorded prior procedures, histological results, indications for re-operation, postoperative follow-up as well as long-term clinical outcomes including stool patterns, nutrition and micturition.

Results:

The follow-up period ranged from 3.0 to 5.5 years (mean: 4.4 years). Indications for repeat procedures were as follows: blind rectal pouch after a Duhamel operation (n=2), persistent aganglionosis (n=4), long-segment stenosis (n=1) after a Rehbein operation, and anal stenosis following TERPT (transanal endorectal pull-through) (n=1). In one patient who had a Duhamel-Martin operation, extirpation of the rectum and a definitive terminal ileostomy was necessary. A Duhamel procedure was performed in five patients with a primary Rehbein and 1 patient with a primary Duhamel operation. Complete stool continence was achieved in 4 patients. Partial fecal incontinence persisted in one patient with associated trisomy 21. 1 patient with total colonic aganglionosis and 1 patient with a pelvic fistula and a previous subtotal colectomy reported soiling 1–2 times per week after a repeat operation. 4 patients in our series experienced postoperative complications following repeated surgery [perianal ulceration (n=2), repeated botulinum toxin injection for sphincter achalasia (n=1) and functionally impaired colonic transit without stenosis (n=1)]. Micturition was normal in 7 patients, 1 patient with associated trisomy 21 was partially continent, and 1 patient reported infrequent urge incontinence.

Conclusions:

All patients improved after further surgical intervention. However, resolution of their symptoms was delayed and partial stool incontinence or soiling persisted in 3 patients. Most complications leading to repeat procedures are preventable, especially residual aganglionosis. Therefore, great efforts should be made to minimize complications when planning and performing the primary surgery.

Key words

Hirschsprung’s disease - redo operation - outcome - complication - aganglionosis

• References

• 1 Keshtgar Ward HC, Clayden GS. et al. Investigations for incontinence and constipation after surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2003; 19: 4-8
• 2 Langer JC. Persistent obstructive symptoms after surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease: development of a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 1458-1462
• 3 Moore SW, Albertyn R, Cywes S. Clinical outcome and long-term quality of life after surgical correction of Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31 (11) 1496-1502
• 4 Levitt MA, Dickie B, Pena A. Evaluation and treatment of the patient with Hirschsprung disease who is not doing well after a pull-through procedure. Sem Pediatr Surg 2010; 19: 146-153
• 5 Teitelbaum DH, Coran A. Reoperative surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 2003; 12: 124-131
• 6 Dasgupta R, Langer JC. Evaluation and management of persistent problems after surgery for Hirschsprung disease in a child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2008; 46: 13-19
• 7 Till H, Heinrich M, Schuster T et al. Is the anorectal sphincter damaged during transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) for Hirschsprung’s disease? A 3-dimensional, vector manometric investigation. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2006; 16: 188-191
• 8 Obermayr F, Hacker HW, Bornemann A et al. Redo-endorectal pull through following various pull-through procedures in Hirschsprung’s disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008; 393: 493-499
• 9 Schweizer P, Berger S, Schweizer M et al. Repeated pull-through surgery for complicated Hirschsprung’s disease – principles derived from clinical experience. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 536-543
• 10 Van Leeuwen K, Teitelbaum DH, Elhalaby EA et al. Long-term follow-up of redo pull-through procedures for Hirschsprung’s disease: efficacy of the endorectal pull-through. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35 (06) 829-834
• 11 Rassouli R, Holschneider AM, Bolkenius M et al. Long-term results of Rehbein’s procedure: A retrospective study in German-speaking countries. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003; 13: 187-194
• 12 Fuchs O, Booß D. Rehbein’s procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease. An appraisal of 45 years. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1999; 9: 389-391
• 13 Reifferscheid P, Schweizer O, Oemichen M. Erworbene segmentäre Hypoganglionosen. Z Kinderchir 1978; 23: 49-52
• 14 Schweizer P, Pfeiffer J, Oemichen M. Pathogenese sekundärer neuronaler Veränderungen am Darm. Z Kinderchirur 1980; 31: 197-201
• 15 Wester T, Zetterlind L, Fredin K et al. Postoperative obstructive symptoms are common after Rehbein’s procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2006; 16: 100-103
• 16 Visser R, van de Ven TJ, van Rooij IALM et al. Is the Rehbein procedure obsolete in the treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease?. Pediatrc Surg Int 2010; 26: 1117-1120
• 17 Menezes M, Puri P. Long-term clinical outcome in patients with Hirschsprung’s disease and associated Down’s syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (05) 810-812
• 18 Quinn FM, Surana R, Puri P. The influence of trisomy 21 on outcome in children with Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29 (06) 781-783
• 19 Wester T, Hoehner J, Olsen L. Rehbein’s anterior resection in Hirschsprung’s disease, using a circular stapler. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1995; 5: 358-362
• 20 Langer JC. Repeat pull-through surgery for complicated Hirschsprung’s disease: indication, technique and results. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 7: 1136-1141
• 21 Pini-Prato A, Mattiolo G, Giunta C et al. Redo surgery in Hirschsprung disease: what did we learn? Unicentric experience with 70 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45: 747-754
• 22 Weber TR, Fortuna RS, Silen ML et al. Reoperation for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 1: 153-157
• 23 Pena A, Elicevik M, Levitt MA. Reoperations in Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 1008-1014
• 24 Pini-Prato A, Gentilino V, Giunta C et al. Hirschsprung disease: do risk factors of poor surgical outcome exist?. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 612-619
• 25 Tariq GM, Brereton RJ, Wright VM. Complications of endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 1991; 10: 1202-1206
• 26 Wilcox DT, Kiely EM. Repeat pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 1998; 10: 1507-1509
• 27 Gobran TA, Ezzat A, Hassan ME et al. Redo transanal endorectal pull-through study. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23: 189-193
• 28 Hadidi A, Bartoli F, Waag KL. Role of transanal endorectal pull-through in complicated for Hirschsprung’s disease: experience in 18 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 544-548
• 29 El-Sawaf MI, Drongowski RA, Chamberlain JN et al. Are the long-term results of the transanal pull-through equal to those of the transabdominal pull-through? A comparison of the 2 approaches for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 41-47
• 30 Obermayr F, Szavay P, Beschorner R et al. Outcome of transanal endorectal pull-through in patients with for Hirschsprung’s disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19: 220-223
• 31 Rescorla FJ, Morrison AM, Engels D et al. Hirschsprung’s disease. Evaluation of mortality and long-term function in 260 cases. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 934-941