Concise Diverted Total Synthesis
of Amphidinolide T1 and T4 from a (12E)-Cycloalkene
by Selective Functionalization of the C12-C13 Double Bond

Lijie Sun; Dongdong Wu; Jinlong Wu; Wei-Min Dai

doi:10.1055/s-0031-1289903

RSS-Feed abonnieren

Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000083.xml

Teilen / Bookmarken

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

PDF herunterladen

Synlett 2011(20): 3036-3040
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1289903

LETTER

Concise Diverted Total Synthesis of Amphidinolide T1 and T4 from a (12E)-Cycloalkene by Selective Functionalization of the C12-C13 Double Bond

Lijie Sun^a, Dongdong Wu^b, Jinlong Wu^b, Wei-Min Dai*^a,b
^a Center for Cancer Research and Department of Chemistry, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, P. R. of China
Fax: +85223581594; e-Mail: chdai@ust.hk;
^b Laboratory of Asymmetric Catalysis and Synthesis, Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. of China
Fax: +86(571)87953128; e-Mail: chdai@zju.edu.cn;

Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 2 October 2011
Publikationsdatum:
23. November 2011 (online)

Abstract
Volltext
Referenzen
Zusatzmaterial

Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik

Abstract

Starting from a 19-membered (12E)-cycloalkene prepared by ring-closing metathesis, amphidinolide T1 and T4 were efficiently synthesized via a short sequence of selective functionalization. The key steps highlighted stereoselective dihydroxylation of the (E)-C12-C13 double bond and highly regioselective silylation/desilylation of the (12S,13S)-diol. In particular, a significant solvent effect was discovered for suppressing 1,4 O→O silyl migration or disilylation during selective mono-silylation of the (12R,13R)- and (12S,13S)-diols in toluene. In combination with our previous synthesis of amphidinolide T3, the same (12E)-cycloalkene serves as an advanced common intermediate for concise diverted total synthesis of amphidinolide T family of marine macrolides.

Key words

alkenes - dihydroxylation - macrocycles - osmium - total synthesis

Supporting Information

References and Notes

For reviews, see:
1a Wilson RM. Danishefsky SJ. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71: 8329

Google Scholar
1b Cragg GM. Grothaus PG. Newman DJ. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109: 3012

Google Scholar
1c Szpilman AM. Carreira EM. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49: 9592

Google Scholar
1d Fürstner A. Isr. J. Chem. 2011, 51: 329

Google Scholar
1e Also, see: Wender PA. Miller BL. Nature (London) 2009, 460: 197

Google Scholar
1f Ghosh AK. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75: 7967

Google Scholar
For reviews, see:
2a Kobayashi J. Tsuda M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21: 77

Google Scholar
2b Kobayashi J. Kubota T. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70: 451

Google Scholar
2c Kobayashi J. J. Antibiot. 2008, 61: 271

Google Scholar
3a Tsuda M. Endo T. Kobayashi J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65: 1349

Google Scholar
3b Kobayashi J. Kubota T. Endo T. Tsuda M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66: 134

Google Scholar
3c Kubota T. Endo T. Tsuda M. Shiro M. Kobayashi J. Tetrahedron 2001, 57: 6175

Google Scholar
For total synthesis of amphidinolide T1, see:
4a Ghosh AK. Liu C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 2374

Google Scholar
4b Aïssa C. Riveiros R. Ragot J. Fürstner A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125: 15512

Google Scholar
4c Colby EA. O’Brien KC. Jamison TF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 998

Google Scholar
4d Colby EA. O’Brien KC. Jamison TF. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127: 4297

Google Scholar
4e Yadav JS. Reddy CS. Org. Lett. 2009, 11: 1705

Google Scholar
5 For total synthesis of amphidinolide T2, see: Li H. Wu J. Luo J. Dai W.-M. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16: 11530

Google Scholar
For total synthesis of amphidinolide T3, see:
6a Deng L.-S. Huang X.-P. Zhao G. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71: 4625

Google Scholar
6b Wu D. Li H. Jin J. Wu J. Dai W.-M. Synlett 2011, 895

Google Scholar
6c
See ref. 4b.

Google Scholar
For total synthesis of amphidinolide T4, see:
7a Fürstner A. Aïssa C. Riveiros R. Ragot J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41: 4763

Google Scholar
7b
See also refs. 4b and 4d.

Google Scholar
For synthesis of fragments, see:
8a O’Brien KC. Colby EA. Jamison TF. Tetrahedron 2005, 61: 6243

Google Scholar
8b Abbineni C. Sasmal PK. Mukkanti K. Iqbal J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48: 4259

Google Scholar
8c Luo J. Li H. Wu J. Xing X. Dai W.-M. Tetrahedron 2009, 65: 6828

Google Scholar
8d Sasmal PK. Abbineni C. Iqbal J. Mukkanti K. Tetrahedron 2010, 66: 5000

Google Scholar
8e Clark JS. Labre F. Thomas LH. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9: 4823

Google Scholar
For selective reviews on RCM, see:
9a Grubbs RH. Chang S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54: 4413

Google Scholar
9b Fürstner A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39: 3012

Google Scholar
9c Trnka TM. Grubbs RH. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34: 18

Google Scholar
9d Schrock RR. Hoveyda AH. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42: 4592

Google Scholar
9e Deiters A. Martin SF. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104: 2199

Google Scholar
9f Grubbs RH. Tetrahedron 2004, 60: 7117

Google Scholar
9g Nicolaou KC. Bulger PG. Sarlah D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44: 4490

Google Scholar
9h Gradillas A. Pérez-Castells J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45: 6086

Google Scholar
9i Schrodi Y. Pederson RL. Aldrichimica Acta 2007, 40: 45

Google Scholar
9j Hoveyda AH. Zhugralin AR. Nature (London) 2007, 450: 243

Google Scholar
9k Also see: Handbook of Metathesis Vol. 1: Grubbs RH. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2003.

Google Scholar
9l Handbook of Metathesis Vol. 2: Grubbs RH. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2003.

Google Scholar
9m Handbook of Metathesis Vol. 3: Grubbs RH. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2003.

Google Scholar
For recent reviews on AD, see:
10a Zaitsev AB. Adolfsson H. Synthesis 2006, 1725

Google Scholar
10b Français A. Bedel O. Haudrechy A. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 2495

Google Scholar
For our total synthesis of macrolides using RCM strategy, see:
11a Chen Y. Jin J. Wu J. Dai W.-M. Synlett 2006, 1177

Google Scholar
11b Jin J. Chen Y. Wu J. Dai W.-M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9: 2585

Google Scholar
11c Dai W.-M. Chen Y. Jin J. Wu J. Lou J. He Q. Synlett 2008, 1737

Google Scholar
11d Sun L. Feng G. Guan Y. Liu Y. Wu J. Dai W.-M. Synlett 2009, 2361

Google Scholar
11e Liu Y. Wang J. Li H. Wu J. Feng G. Dai W.-M. Synlett 2010, 2184

Google Scholar
11f Liu Y. Feng G. Wang J. Wu J. Dai W.-M. Synlett 2011, 1774

Google Scholar
For selected examples of 1,4 O→O silyl migration, see:
12a Ogilvie KK. Beaucage SL. Schifman AL. Theriault NY. Sadana KL. Can. J. Chem. 1978, 56: 2768

Google Scholar
12b Jones SS. Reese CB. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 2762

Google Scholar
12c Evans DA. Gauchet-Prunet JA. Carreira EM. Charette AB. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56: 741

Google Scholar
12d Yamazaki T. Mizutani K. Kitazume T. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58: 4346

Google Scholar
12e Yamazaki T. Oniki T. Kitazume T. Tetrahedron 1996, 52: 11753

Google Scholar
12f Lassaletta JM. Schmidt RR. Synlett 1995, 925

Google Scholar
12g Lassaletta JM. Meichle M. Weiler S. Schmidt RR. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1996, 15: 241

Google Scholar
12h Masaguer CF. Blériot Y. Charlwood J. Winchester BG. Leet GWJ. Tetrahedron 1997, 53: 15147

Google Scholar
12i Boger DL. Ichikawa S. Zhong W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123: 4161

Google Scholar
12j Hunter TJ. O’Doherty GA. Org. Lett. 2001, 3: 1049

Google Scholar
12k Teranish K. Ueno F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44: 4843

Google Scholar
12l Zhao ZQ. Peng LZ. Li YL. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2005, 16: 290

Google Scholar
12m Perali RS. Mandava S. Chunduri VR. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52: 3045

Google Scholar
12n Also see: Rücher C. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95: 1009

Google Scholar
12o Wuts PGM. Greene TW. Greene’s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis 4th ed.: John Wiley & Sons; New Jersey: 2007. p.166

Google Scholar

13

Chem3D models show that the (13R)-OH group in 5 orients opposite to both the (12R)-OH and the (14R)-Me groups while (13S)-OH group in 6 aligns closely with both the (12S)-OH and the (14R)-Me groups. It should be possible for hydrogen bonding or 1,4 O→O silyl migration to take place in 6 but not in 5.

14

Characterization Data for Amphidinolide T4 (3): colorless oil; [α]_D ^²0 -9.6 (c = 0.12, CHCl₃), lit.^4b,4d,7a [α]_D ^²³
-7.5 (c = 0.8, CHCl₃), [α]_D ^²0 -3.0 (c = 0.12, CHCl₃); R _f 0.35 (20% EtOAc in hexane). IR (film): 3458 (br), 2934, 1724, 1459, 1252, 1071 cm^-¹. ^¹H NMR and ^¹³C NMR data are identical to those of natural amphidinolide T4 (see Figures S3 and S4 in the Supporting Information). HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + H⁺] calcd for C₂₅H₄₃O₅: 423.3111; found: 423.3116.

15

Characterization Data for Amphidinolide T1 (1): colorless oil; [α]_D ^²0 +20.3 (c = 0.15, CHCl₃), lit.^³a [α]_D ^²0 +18 (c = 0.3, CHCl₃); R_f 0.27 (17% EtOAc in hexane). IR (film): 3401 (br), 2928, 1727, 1463, 1253, 1060 cm^-¹; ^¹H NMR and ^¹³C NMR data are identical to those of natural amphidinolide T1 (see Figures S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information). HRMS (+ESI): m/z [M + H⁺] calcd for C₂₅H₄₃O₅: 423.3111; found: 423.3104.

Zusatzmaterial

Supporting Information