Endoscopy 2012; 44(02): 128-136
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291487
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J. Wu
Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
B. Hu
Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 02 April 2011

accepted after revision 28 July 2011

Publication Date:
23 January 2012 (online)

Background and study aims: Insufflation of the intestinal tract, usually with room air, is necessary to improve visualization during colonoscopy. However, most patients complain of bowel distension and abdominal pain afterwards. Recently, carbon dioxide (CO2) rather than air insufflation has been used. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency, safety, and comfort of colonoscopy CO2 insufflation, with systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Science Citation Index, and important meeting abstracts were searched and evaluated by two reviewers independently.

Results: Nine RCT studies involving 1577 patients were analyzed. There was significant heterogeneity for some major results; we analyzed these using a random-effects model. Meta-analysis showed fewer patients with abdominal pain in the CO2 group during the procedure (relative risk [RR] 0.77, 95 % confidence intervals [CI] 0.62 – 0.96), and post procedure at 1 hour (0.26, 0.16 – 0.43), 6 hours (0.36, 0.20 – 0.64), and 24 hours (0.53, 0.31 – 0.91). The number needed to treat (NNT) during the procedure was 7; post procedure, the NNT at 1 hour was 2, at 6 hours it was 3, and at 24 hours it was 12. Compared with air, CO2 insufflation was associated with less passage of flatus post procedurally, at 1 hour (RR 0.09, 95 %CI 0.03 – 0.24) and 6 hours (0.30, 0.14 – 0.62). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding safety, gas volume, and cecal intubation rate.

Conclusions: Insufflation with CO2 in colonoscopy could decrease abdominal discomfort during and following the procedure, without any additional adverse reactions, warranting routine clinical use.

  • References

  • 1 Phaosawasdi K, Cooley W, Wheeler J et al. Carbon dioxide-insufflated colonoscopy: an ignored superior technique. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 330-333
  • 2 Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J et al. Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 564-567
  • 3 Rogers BH. CO2 during colonoscopy for safety and comfort. Gastrointest Endosc 1985; 31: 108-109
  • 4 Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1984; 30: 68-70
  • 5 Bretthauer M, Hoff G, Thiis-Evensen E et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1103-1107
  • 6 Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO(2) insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO(2) delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 190-194
  • 7 Church J, Delaney C. Randomized, controlled trial of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 322-326
  • 8 Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G et al. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut 2002; 50: 604-607
  • 9 Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS et al. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 843-849
  • 10 Mazaki T, Ebisawa K. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in the English literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 739-755
  • 11 Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 2001; 323: 101-105
  • 12 Bretthauer M, Hoff GS, Thiis-Evensen E et al. Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 203-206
  • 13 Bretthauer M, Lynge AB, Thiis-Evensen E et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: safe and effective in sedated patients. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 706-709
  • 14 Wong JC, Yau KK, Cheung HY et al. Towards painless colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial on carbon dioxide-insufflating colonoscopy. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78: 871-874
  • 15 Liu X, Liu D, Li J et al. [Safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colonoscopy]. J Cent S Univ Med Sci 2009; 34: 825-829
  • 16 Riss S, Akan B, Mikola B et al. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2009; 121: 464-468
  • 17 Yamano HO, Yoshikawa K, Kimura T et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gas volume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partial CO2 pressure. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 1235-1240
  • 18 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T et al. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with the patient under conscious sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 537-542
  • 19 Nakajima K, Lee SW, Sonoda T et al. Intraoperative carbon dioxide colonoscopy: a safe insufflation alternative for locating colonic lesions during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 321-325