Most randomised trials on homeopathy are based either on a wrong epistemology, or
on a misunderstanding of the homeopathic method, or on both. The result is logically
irrelevant as seen with the efficacy paradox. In order to design trials appropriate
to assess the effect of a homeopathic therapy, a more detailed understanding of the
healing process is necessary. This article analyses some frequent mistakes of homeopathic
trials.
Key words
Randomised trials - Epistemology - Tuning - Practitionerʼs paradox