Determining the Isometric Point of the Knee

James P. Stannard; Allan Hammond; Danny Tunmire; Matthew Clayton; Chris Johnson; Cid Moura

doi:10.1055/s-0031-1299664

The Journal of Knee Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Knee Surg 2012; 25(01): 071-074
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299664

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Determining the Isometric Point of the Knee

Autor*innen

James P. Stannard

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, Missouri
Allan Hammond

²Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Danny Tunmire

³Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Matthew Clayton

³Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Chris Johnson

³Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
Cid Moura

³Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

Abstract

Posteromedial and posterolateral reconstructions of the knee are frequently required in the management of knee dislocations. This study compares the accuracy of radiographic reference points to established anatomical landmarks in reproducing the isometric points of the posteromedial corner and posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee. Posteromedial and posterolateral surgical approaches were made in 20 cadaveric knees. The posteromedial and posterolateral isometric points of each femur were determined using the anatomic landmarks and radiographic reference points in a randomized order. An Isometer was used to measure the displacement, to the nearest millimeter; knees were passed into flexion. A two-tailed t-test was used to analyze the data and statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. For the isometric point of the PLC, the radiographic method resulted in a mean displacement of 1.63 mm as the knee was passed from extension into flexion, while the anatomic method had a mean displacement of 4.84 mm (p < 0.00018). The mean displacement on the posteromedial side using the radiographic method was 2.10 mm as the knee was passed from extension into flexion, while the anatomic method resulted in 3.21 mm of displacement (p = 0.074).

Keywords

isometric point - posteromedial ligament reconstructions - posterolateral ligament reconstructions - radiographic reference points

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Stannard JP, Brown SL, Farris RC, McGwin Jr G, Volgas DA. The posterolateral corner of the knee: repair versus reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (6) 881-888
2 Fanelli GC, Edson CJ. Arthroscopically assisted combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multiple ligament injured knee: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (7) 703-714
3 Bin S-I, Nam T-S. Surgical outcome of 2-stage management of multiple knee ligament injuries after knee dislocation. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (10) 1066-1072
4 Sigward SM, Markolf KL, Graves BR, Chacko JM, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Femoral fixation sites for optimum isometry of posterolateral reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (11) 2359-2368
5 Feeley BT, Muller MS, Allen AA, Granchi CC, Pearle AD. Biomechanical comparison of medial collateral ligament reconstructions using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (6) 1123-1130
6 LaPrade RF, Muench C, Wentorf F, Lewis JL. The effect of injury to the posterolateral structures of the knee on force in a posterior cruciate ligament graft: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (2) 233-238
7 LaPrade RF, Resig S, Wentorf F, Lewis JL. The effects of grade III posterolateral knee complex injuries on anterior cruciate ligament graft force. A biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27 (4) 469-475
8 Bartel DL, Marshall JL, Schieck RA, Wang JB. Surgical repositioning of the medial collateral ligament. An anatomical and mechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59 (1) 107-116
9 LaPrade RF, Engebretsen AH, Ly TV, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L. The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (9) 2000-2010
10 Victor J, Wong P, Witvrouw E, Sloten JV, Bellemans J. How isometric are the medial patellofemoral, superficial medial collateral, and lateral collateral ligaments of the knee?. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (10) 2028-2036
11 Stannard J, Schmidt A, Kregor P. Surgical Treatment of Orthopedic Trauma. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007
12 Robinson JR, Sanchez-Ballester J, Bull AM, Thomas RdeW, Amis AA. The posteromedial corner revisited. An anatomical description of the passive restraining structures of the medial aspect of the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (5) 674-681
13 Pietrini SD, LaPrade RF, Griffith CJ, Wijdicks CA, Ziegler CG. Radiographic identification of the primary posterolateral knee structures. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (3) 542-551
14 Wijdicks CA, Griffith CJ, LaPrade RF , et al. Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (3) 521-529
15 Kim S-J, Park I-S, Cheon Y-M, Ryu S-W. New technique for chronic posterolateral instability of the knee: posterolateral reconstruction using the tibialis posterior tendon allograft. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (Suppl. 02) 195-200
16 Nau T, Chevalier Y, Hagemeister N, Deguise JA, Duval N. Comparison of 2 surgical techniques of posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (12) 1838-1845
17 Park SE, DeFrate LE, Suggs JF, Gill TJ, Rubash HE, Li G. The change in length of the medial and lateral collateral ligaments during in vivo knee flexion. Knee 2005; 12 (5) 377-382
18 Stannard JP, Wilson TC, Sheils TM, McGwin Jr G, Volgas DA, Alonso JE. Heterotopic ossification associated with knee dislocation. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (8) 835-839