Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(05): 364-369
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299751
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Reliability of Lower Extremity and Thoracic Kinematics at Various Running Speeds

K. Doma
1   Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
,
G. B. Deakin
1   Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
,
R. M. Sealey
2   Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 05 December 2011

Publication Date:
29 February 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Whilst various studies have examined lower extremity joint kinematics during running, there is limited investigation on joint kinematics at steady-state running and at intensities close to exhaustion. Subsequently, the purpose of this study was to determine whether the reliability of kinematics in the lower extremity and thorax is affected by varying the running speeds during a running economy test. 14 trained and moderately trained runners undertook 2 running economy tests with each test incorporating 3 intensity stages: 70-, 90- and 110% of the second ventilatory threshold, respectively. The participants ran for 10 min during each of the first 2 stages and to exhaustion during the last stage. Kinematics of the ankle, knee, hip, pelvis and thorax were recorded using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), limits of agreement (LOA) and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to calculate reliability. The ICC, LOA and CV of the lower extremity and thoracic kinematic variables ranged from 0.33–0.97, 1.03–1.39 and 2.0–18.6, respectively. Whilst the reliability did vary between the kinematic variables, the majority of results showed minimal within-subject variation and moderate to high reliability. In conclusion, examining thoracic and lower extremity kinematics is useful in determining whether running kinematics is altered with varying running intensities.

Key words

biomechanics - running - discontinuous - incremental - gait analyses
 

  • References

  • 1 Alcaraz PE, Palao JM, Elvira JL, Linthorne NP. Effects of three types of resisted sprint training devices on the kinematics of sprinting at maximum velocity. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 890-897
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Angeloni C, Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A. Quantification of relative displacement of skin- and plate-mounted markers with respect to bones. J Biomech 1993; 26: 864
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Method agreement and measurement error in the physiology of exercise. In: Winter EM, Mercer T, Bromley PD, Davison RC, Jones AM. eds Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines: Sport Testing. Volume 1. London: Routledge; 2006: 41-48
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Atkinson G, Neville AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Billat V, Renoux JC, Pinoteau J, Petit B, Koralsztein JP. Reproducibility of running time to exhaustion at VO2max in subelite runners. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1994; 26: 254-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Caplan N, Rogers R, Parr MK, Hayes PR. The effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and static stretch training on running mechanics. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1175-1180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Cappozzo A, Della Croce U, Leardini A, Chiari L. Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. Gait Posture 2005; 21: 186-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chen TC, Nosaka K, Lin MJ, Chen HL, Wu CJ. Changes in running economy at different intensities following downhill running. J Sports Sci 2007; 27: 1137-1144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Derrick TR, Dereu D, McLean SP. Impacts and kinematic adjustments during an exhaustive run. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 998-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dingwell JB, Cusumano JP, Cavanagh PR, Sternad D. Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking. J Biomech Eng 2001; 123: 27-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Diss CE. The reliability of kinetic and kinematic variables used to analyse normal running gait. Gait Posture 2001; 14: 98-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dutto DJ, Braun WA. DOMS-associated changes in ankle and knee joint dynamics during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 560-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ferber R, McClay Davis I, Williams 3rd DS, Laughton C. A comparison of within- and between-day reliability of discrete 3D lower extremity variables in runners. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 1139-1145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kellis E, Liassou C. The effect of selective muscle fatigue on sagittal lower limb kinematics and muscle activity during level running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39: 210-220
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Maynard V, Bakheit AM, Oldham J, Freeman J. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of gait measurements with CODA mpx30 motion analysis system. Gait Posture 2003; 17: 59-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Miana AN, Prudêncio MV, Barros RM. Comparison of protocols for walking and running kinematics based on skin surface markers and rigid clusters of markers. Int J Sports Med 2009; 30: 827-833
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Morgan DW, Martin PE, Krahenbuhl GS, Baldini FD. Variability in running economy and mechanics among trained male runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 378-383
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Neville AM, Atkinson G. Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31: 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Noehren B, Manal K, Davis I. Improving between-day kinematic reliability using a marker placement device. J Orthop Res 2010; 28: 1405-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Paschalis V, Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V, Jamurtas AZ, Theoharis V, Kotzamanidis C, Koutedakis Y. The effects of muscle damage following eccentric exercise on gait biomechanics. Gait Posture 2007; 25: 236-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pohl MB, Lloy C, Ferber R. Can the reliability of three-dimensional running kinematics be improved using functional joint methodology?. Gait Posture 2010; 32: 559-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Saunders PU, Pyne DB, Telford RD, Hawley JA. Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners. Sports Med 2004; 34: 465-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Snyder KR, Earl JE, O’Connor KM, Ebersole KT. Resistance training is accompanied by increases in hip strength and changes in lower extremity biomechanics during running. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009; 24: 26-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Vicon® . Plug-in-Gait modelling instructions. Vicon® Manual, Vicon Motion Systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford Metrics Ltd.; 2008: 23
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Vincent WJ (3rd ed.) Statistics in Kinesiology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005. 196.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Winter DA (4th ed.) Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. 51.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Wolf P, List R, Ukelo T, Maiwald C, Stacoff A. Day-to-day consistency of lower extremity kinematics during walking and running. J Appl Biomech 2009; 25: 369-376
    PubMedGoogle Scholar