Download PDF
Der Klinikarzt 2012; 41(S 01): 44-50
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312462
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Antikoagulation mit Vitamin-K-Antagonisten bei nicht-valvulärem Vorhofflimmern – Standortbestimmung 2012

Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
Dieter Horstkotte
1   Kardiologische Klinik, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
,
Detlef Hering
1   Kardiologische Klinik, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
,
Wolfgang Prohaska
2   Institut für Laboratoriums- und Transfusionsmedizin, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
,
Cornelia Piper
1   Kardiologische Klinik, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 April 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Nach Zulassung des ersten direkten Thrombinantagonisten Dabigatran und des ersten Faktor Xa-Inhibitors Rivaroxaban zur Thromboembolieprophylaxe bei nicht-valvulärem Vorhofflimmern haben die Vitamin-K-Antagonisten (VKA) ihr Alleinstellungsmerkmal als orale Antikoagulantien verloren. Inwieweit sich die neuen Substanzen im primär zugelassenen Indikationsbereich und darüber hinaus durchsetzen, werden die Ergebnisse weiterer Zulassungsstudien, die klinischen Erfahrungen mit den neuen Substanzen und deren Akzeptanz angesichts der hohen Tagestherapiekosten zeigen.

With the introduction of dabigatran and rivaroxaban into routine clinical practice, the vitamin K antagonists (VKA) lost their unique position as oral anticoagulants hitherto for the indication of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The new oral anticoagulants however have been tested against warfarin (Coumadin®) only, while in Germany nearly exclusively phenprocoumon (Marcumar®, Falithrom®) is used. Phenprocoumon significantly differs in a variety of pharmacological features from the warfarin-type VKA.

The extensive widening of indications for the long-term use of oral anticoagulants based on score systems providing a selectivity as low as 20 % is critically discussed and an algorithm given for the differential use of VKA vs. the new oral anticoagulants focusing on first ever vs. already established therapy, effectiveness of VKA, underlying etiology of atrial fibrillation (e. g. ”lone“ , ”valvular“, and/or ”rheumatic“ atrial fibrillation) and potential contraindications for the use of either anticoagulants.

Key words

vitamin K antagonists - phenprocoumon - dabigatran - rivaroxaban - atrial fibrillation - stability of oral anticoagulation - left atrial appendage closure
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-891
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Oldenburg J, Watzka M, Rost S, Müller CR. VKORC1: molecular target of coumarins. J Thromb Haemost. 05.07.2007; (Suppl. 01) 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gulati G, Hevelow M, George M, Behling E, Siegel J. International Normalized Ratio Versus Plasma Levels of Coagulation Factors in Patients on Vitamin K Antagonist Therapy. Arch Path Lab Med 2011; 135: 490-494
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Horstkotte D, Hohnloser S, Keller F et al. Empfehlung zur Einführung der Internationalen Normalisierten Ratio (INR) als objektives Maß für die Intensität einer oralen Antikoagulantien-Therapie. Z Kardiol 1994; 83: 676-679
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zivelin A, Rao VM, Rapaport SI. Mechanism of the anticoagulant effect of warfarin as evaluated in rabbits by selective depression of individual procoagulant vitamin-K dependent clotting factors. J Clin Invest 1993; 92: 2131-2140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ansell J, Hirsh J, Hylek E et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. (Suppl. 06) 2008; 133: 160-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dunn AS, Turpie AGG. Perioperative Management of Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulants. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 901-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR, Wintzen AR et al. Optimal oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Piper C, Schulte HD, Horstkotte D. Optimization of Oral Anticoagulation for Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve Prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4: 127-137
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 El Rouby S, Mestres CA, LaDuca FM, Zucker ML. Racial and ethnic differences in warfarin response. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 15-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Palaniswamy C, Sekhri A, Aronow WS et al. Association of warfarin use with valvular and vascular calcification: a review. Clin Cardiol 2011; 34: 74-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Horstkotte D, Bergemann R eds. Antithrombotic Management after Heart Valve Replacement: Results and Consequences of the GELIA study. Proceedings of an International Symposium. Eur Heart J Suppl 2001; 03 (Suppl. 01)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Karnofsky DA, Burchenai JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacLoad CM, ed Sympoisum held at New York Academy of Medicine. Columbia University Press; 1949: 191-305
    Google Scholar
  • 16 You JJ, Singer DE, Howard PA et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW. Death and other time-related events after valve replacement. Circulation 1995; 72: 753-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Horstkotte D, Piper C, Wiemer M. Optimal frequency of patient monitoring and intensity of oral anticoagulation therapy in valvular heart disease. J Thromb Thrombol 1998; 5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Koertke H, Zittermann A, Wagner O et al. Efficacy and safety of very low-dose self-management of oral anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90: 1487-1493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fitzmaurice D, Horstkotte D. Executive Summary: Prevention of Thromboembolic events: the role of point of care management. J Heart Valve Dis 2007; 16: 184-186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ellis DJ, Usman MH, Milner PG et al. The first evaluation of a novel vitamin K antagonist, Tecarfarin (ATI-5923), in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2009; 120: 1029-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: Results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 2001; 285: 2864-2870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lip GY, Frison L, Halperin JL, Lane DA. Identifying patients at high risk for stroke despite anticoagulation: a comparison of contemporary stroke risk stratification schemes in an anticoagulated atrial fibrillation cohort. Stroke 2010; 41: 2731-2738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lip GY, Niewlaat R, Pisters R et al. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest 2010; 137: 263-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y et al. Comparison of risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in people with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 810-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138: 1093-1100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Poli D, Antonucci E, Grifoni E et al. Bleeding risk during oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients older than 80 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 999-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Reddy VY, Holmes D, Doshi SK, Neuzil P, Kar S. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry. Circulation 2011; 123: 417-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 755-759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar