Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51(5): 427-431
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325371
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Dynamic Vascular Pattern (DVP), a Quantification Tool for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

Dynamic Vascular Pattern: ein neues Quantifizierungswerkzeug für kontrastverstärkte Ultraschalltechniken
X. W. Cui
,
A. Ignee
,
M. Jedrzejczyk
,
C. F. Dietrich
Further Information

Publication History

30 March 2012

26 August 2012

Publication Date:
16 May 2013 (online)

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is widely applied in tumour diagnosis, especially for focal liver lesions (FLL), due to its high sensitivity and specificity. According to the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) CEUS guidelines (2012) and non-liver guidelines (2011), the majority of tumours, regardless of location, show specific CEUS enhancement patterns that can distinguish benign from malignant lesions. However, even experienced clinicians evaluating FLL may find occasional irregularities in these patterns, due to particular FLL pathologies, that make a definitive diagnosis difficult. Hence, there is a need to train physicians to utilize contrast enhancement kinetics to aid in the correct interpretation of data from CEUS examinations in patients with divergent liver tumour pathologies. Here we report on a CEUS quantitation software, SonoLiver®, to verify and improve diagnostic accuracy in the characterization of suspicious liver lesions through the analysis of dynamic vascular patterns (DVP).

Zusammenfassung

Kontrastverstärkte Ultraschalltechniken haben sich im klinischen Alltag etabliert und es wurden Leitlinien publiziert. In manchen Fällen sind diskrete Anreicherungsunterschiede, bspw. in einem Lebertumor und umgebenden Leberparenchym, schwierig zu differenzieren. Dynamic Vascular Pattern (DVP) ist eine hilfreiche Methode, diese Unterschiede farblich zu markieren, d. h. ein rot/orangener Farbton spricht für eine relative Mehranreicherung im Vergleich zur Umgebung und eine blaue Färbung für eine relative Minderanreicherung. In der folgenden Arbeit wird die Technik dargelegt und mögliche Anwendungsbereiche diskutiert.

 
  • References

  • 1 Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) – update 2008. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 28-44
  • 2 Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CF et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 33-59
  • 3 Dietrich CF. Liver tumor characterization – comments and illustrations regarding guidelines. Ultraschall (Suppl) 2012; 33: S22-S30
  • 4 Dietrich CF, Cui XW, Ignee A. EFSUMB Guidelines 2011: Comments and illustrations. Ultraschall (Suppl) 2012; 33: S11-S21
  • 5 Dietrich CF, Averkiou M, Correas J et al. An EFSUMB introduction into dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall 2012; 33: 344-351
  • 6 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M et al. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 350-356
  • 7 Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Trojan J et al. Improved characterisation of histologically proven liver tumours by contrast enhanced ultrasonography during the portal venous and specific late phase of SHU 508A. Gut 2004; 53: 401-405
  • 8 Dietrich CF, Schuessler G, Trojan J et al. Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2005; 78: 704-707
  • 9 Strobel D, Bernatik T, Blank W et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of small (≤20 mm) and subcentimetric (≤ 10 mm) focal liver lesions in comparison with histology. Results of the DEGUM multicenter trial. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 593-597
  • 10 Seitz K, Greis C, Schuler A et al. Frequency of tumor entities among liver tumors of unclear etiology initially detected by sonography in the noncirrhotic or cirrhotic livers of 1349 patients. Results of the DEGUM multicenter study. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 598-603
  • 11 Piscaglia F, Venturi A, Mancini M et al. Diagnostic features of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 276-282
  • 12 Dietrich CF, Mertens JC, Braden B et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven liver hemangiomas. Hepatology 2007; 45: 1139-1145
  • 13 Dietrich CF, Cui XW, Boozari B et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnostic algorithm of hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Ultraschall (Suppl) 2012; 33: S57-S66
  • 14 Dietrich CF, Maddalena ME, Cui XW et al. Liver tumor characterization – review of the literature. Ultraschall (Suppl) 2012; 33: S3-S10
  • 15 Bernatik T, Seitz K, Blank W et al. Unclear focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography – lessons to be learned from the DEGUM multicenter study for the characterization of liver tumors. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 577-581
  • 16 Schacherer D, Girlich C, Wiest R et al. Semiquantitative characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) – perfusion with contrast-enhanced ultrasound and perfusion analysis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2010; 44: 97-105
  • 17 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C. Evidence based endoscopic ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 599-621
  • 18 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C, Hocke M et al. Imaging of gastrointestinal stromal tumours with modern ultrasound techniques – a pictorial essay. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 457-467
  • 19 Dietrich CF, Hocke M, Jenssen C. Interventional endosonography. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 8-22 , quiz
  • 20 Claudon M, Dietrich CF, Choi BI et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver-update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34 (01) 11-29
  • 21 Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34 (02) 169-184
  • 22 Dietrich CF, Ponnudurai R, Bachmann NM. [Is there a need for new imaging methods for lymph node evaluation?]. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (05) 411-414
  • 23 Dietrich CF, Jenssen C. [Focal liver lesion, incidental finding]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2012; 137 (41) 2099-2116
  • 24 Dietrich CF. [Elastography, the new dimension in ultrasonography]. Praxis (Bern 1994 ); 2011; 100 (25) 1533-1542
  • 25 Dietrich CF. Echtzeit-Gewebeelastographie. Anwendungsmöglichkeiten nicht nur im Gastrointestinaltrakt. Endoskopie Heute 2010; 23: 177-212
  • 26 Cui XW, Ignee A, Bachmann NM et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound of sentinel lymph nodes. J Ultrason 2012; in press
  • 27 Dietrich CF, Cui XW, Barreiros AP et al. EFSUMB guidelines 2011: comment on emergent indications and visions. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 Suppl 1: S39-S47
  • 28 Dietrich CF. Editorial “Challenges for the German Health Care System”. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50 (06) 555-556
  • 29 Dietrich CF, Riemer-Hommel P. Challenges for the German Health Care System. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50 (06) 557-572
  • 30 Schreiber-Dietrich D, Dietrich CF. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and off-label use (in children). Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (03) 295-296