PDF herunterladen
Ultraschall Med 2012; 33(05): 463-468
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325428
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Reliability of Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography for Neck Lesions Identified in Routine Clinical Practice

Reliabilität der Scherwellen-Ultraschall-Elastografie von Halsläsionen, die bei der klinischen Routine entdeckt wurden
K. Bhatia
1   Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong
,
C. S. L. Tong
2   Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital
,
C. C. M. Cho
2   Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital
,
E. H. Y. Yuen
2   Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital
,
J. Lee
3   Divison of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
,
A. T. Ahuja
1   Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Chinese University of Hong Kong
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

02. Februar 2012

09. August 2012

Publikationsdatum:
21. September 2012 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of shear wave ultrasound elastography (SWE) in the neck.

Materials and Methods: 176 neck lesions (40 thy roid, 56 lymph nodes, 46 salivary, 34 miscella neous) identified in a routine US clinic underwent SWE by one or two blinded radiologists. For this study, SWE required the operator to acquire three 10 second dynamic colour-coded SWE cineloops per lesion, select one static image per cineloop, and place circular regions-of-interest within the entire lesion and stiffest part to generate 3 SWE measurements per static image. For logistical rea sons, one radiologist evaluated all 176 lesions and the other evaluated 58 lesions. Both radiologists also reviewed 27 archived cineloops independ ently to assess SWE excluding practical technique. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correla tion coefficients (ICCs) concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and coefficients of repeatabil ity (CORs).

Results: Test-retest ICCs for the radiologist evalu ating 176 lesions were 0.78–0.85 (fair-excellent agreement), CCCs were 0.85–0.88 (substantial agreement), and CORs were 14.9–36.1 kPa. For both radiologists evaluating 58 lesions, intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs were 0.65–0.78 and 0.72–0.77 respectively. For SWE excluding practical technique, inter-rater ICCs were 0.97–0.98 (ex cellent agreement). ICCs differed according to tis sue, being higher in thyroid lesions than lymph nodes (p < 0.001), and higher in benign than ma lignant lesions (p values < 0.001).

Conclusion: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of SWE is fair to excellent according to ICCs. SWE re liability is influenced appreciably by acquisition technique. Nevertheless, CORs for SWE are not negligible. To determine whether these results are acceptable clinically, further research is re quired to establish SWE stiffness values of normal and pathological tissues in the neck.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Die Bewertung der Reabilität der Scherwellen-Ultraschall-Elastografie (SWE) des Halses.

Material und Methoden: Bei 176 Halsläsionen (davon 40 der Schilddrüse, 56 der Lymphknoten, 46 der Speicheldrüsen und 34 verschiedenartige), die durch Routineultraschall festgestellt wurden, wurde eine SWE durch einen oder zwei Radiologen unter Verblindung durchgeführt. In dieser Studie war bei der SWE erforderlich, dass der Untersucher drei 10 s lange dynamische farbkodierte SWE-Cineloops pro Läsion aufnahm, ein statisches Bild für den Cineloop auswählte und kreisförmige Bereiche der Region-of-Interest innerhalb der gesamten Läsion platzierte und den steifsten Teil um 3 SWE-Messungen pro statischem Bild zu generieren. Aus logistischen Gründen beurteilte ein Radiologe alle 176 Läsionen und ein anderer 58 Läsionen. Beide Radiologen überprüften unabhängig voneinander 27 archivierte Cineloops, um die SWE unter Aus schluss der praktischen Technik einzuschätzen. Die Reliabilität wurde mittels „Intra-Class“- Korrelationskoeffizienten (ICCs), Konkordanz- Korrelationskoeffizienten (CCCs) und den Wie derholbarkeitskoeffizienten (coefficients of re peatability, CORs) bewertet.

Ergebnisse: Die Test-Testwiederholungs-ICCs des Radiologen, der die 176 Läsionen bewertete, betrugen 0,78–0,85 (gute bis ausgezeichnete Über einstimmung), die CCCs betrugen 0,85–0,88 (erhe bliche Übereinstimmung) und die CORs betrugen 14,9–36,1 kPa. Für beide Radiologen, die 58 Läsio nen bewerteten, betrugen die Intrarater-ICCs 0,65–0,78 und die Interrater-ICCs 0,72–0,77. Für die SWE unter Ausschluss der praktischen Technik betrugen die Interrater-ICCs 0,97–0,98 (ausge zeichnete Übereinstimmung). Die ICCs unterschie den sich je nach Gewebe und waren in Schilddrü sen-Läsionen höher als in Lymphknoten (p < 0,001) und in gutartigen Läsionen höher als in malignen (p-Werte < 0,001).

Schlussfolgerung: Die Intra- und Interrater-Reliabilität der SWE ist den ICCs zufolge gut bis ausgezeichnet. Die Reabilität der SWE wird deutlich von der Aufnahmetechnik beeinflusst. Dennoch sind die CORs der SWE nicht unerheblich. Um zu ermitteln, ob diese Ergeb nisse klinisch akzeptierbar sind, ist noch weitere Forschungsarbeit in Bezug auf die Feststellung der SWE-Steifigkeitswerte im normal en und pathologischen Halsgewebe erforderlich.

Key words

ultrasound - thyroid - head/neck - salivary glands - elastography
 

  • References

  • 1 Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004; 51: 396-409 . Epub 2004/05/14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G. et al. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid 2010; 20: 1145-1150 . Epub 2010/09/24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM. et al. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 551-563 . Epub 2010/04/09
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R. et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography – initial experience. Radiology 2007; 243: 258-267 . Epub 2007/02/13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Giovannini M. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: A multicenter study. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2009; 15: 1587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S. et al. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS (R)-US classification system with sonoelastography. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 484-491 . Epub 2010/04/22
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ciurea AI, Bolboaca SD, Ciortea CA. et al. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: S27-S34 . Epub 2010/10/13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schrader H, Wiese M, Ellrichmann M. et al. Diagnostic Value of Quantitative EUS Elastography for Malignant Pancreatic Tumors: Relationship with Pancreatic Fibrosis (EUS-Elastografie in der Diagnostik maligner Pankreastumoren: Korrelation zur Pankreasfibrose). Ultraschall in Med 2011, Epub 2011/06/02
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yoon JH, Kim MJ, Kim EK. et al. Discordant Elastography Images of Breast Lesions: How Various Factors Lead to Discordant Findings (Diskordante elastografische Bilder von Brusttumoren: Wie verschiedene Faktoren zu diskordanten Befunden führen). Ultraschall in Med 2012, Epub 2012/06/23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rubaltelli L, Corradin S, Dorigo A. et al. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules at elastosonography. Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 175-179 . Epub 2008/05/23
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H. et al. Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterisation and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Ultraschall in Med 2006; 27: 535-542 . Epub 2006/12/13
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sebag F, Vaillant-Lombard J, Berbis J. et al. Shear wave elastography: a new ultrasound imaging mode for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 5281-5288 . Epub 2010/10/01
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M. et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging – preliminary results. Radiology 2010; 256: 297-303 . Epub 2010/05/28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A. et al. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 1373-1386 . Epub 2008/04/09
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Arda K, Ciledag N, Aktas E. et al. Quantitative assessment of normal softtissue elasticity using shear-wave ultrasound elastography. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 532-536 . Epub 2011/08/25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K. et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12: R104 . Epub 2010/12/03
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tozaki M, Fukuma E. Pattern classification of ShearWaveTM Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses. Acta Radiologica 2011; 52 (10) 1069-1075 . Epub 2011/10/21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N. et al. Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2011; 129: 89-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ. et al. Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses. Radiology 2012; 262: 435-449 . Epub 2012/01/28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Dore CJ. et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 2011, Epub 2012/01/03
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Tong CS. et al. Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging of Cervical Lymph Nodes. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, Epub 2011/12/20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Tong CS. et al. Shear wave elastography of focal salivary gland lesions: preliminary experience in a routine head and neck US clinic. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 957-965 . Epub 2011/12/28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Tong CS. et al. Shear wave elastography of focal salivary gland lesions: preliminary experience in a routine head and neck US clinic. Eur Radiol 2011, Epub 2011/12/28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bhatia KS, Tong CS, Cho CC. et al. Shear wave elastography of thyroid nodules in routine clinical practice: preliminary observations and utility for detecting malignancy. Eur Radiol 2012, Epub 2012/05/31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological bulletin 1979; 86: 420-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255-268 . Epub 1989/03/01
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 2nd. ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health: Upper Saddle River; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Sanchez MM, Binkowitz BS. Guidelines for measurement validation in clinical trial design. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics 1999; 9: 417-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Precision of test methods 1: Guide for the determination and reproducibility for a standard test method BS 597, Part 1. London, BSI: British Standards Institution; 1979
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Yuen YH. et al. Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of cervical lymph nodes in routine clinical practice: interobserver agreement and correlation with malignancy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010; 36: 1990-1997 . Epub 2010/10/19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tan R, Xiao Y, He Q. Ultrasound elastography: Its potential role in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 849-855 . Epub 2010/06/15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lim DJ, Luo S, Kim MH. et al. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility in thyroid ultrasound elastography. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 896-901 . Epub 2012/03/28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Park SH, Kim SJ, Kim EK. et al. Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: W416-W423 . Epub 2009/10/22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar