Abstract
Aim To report the first European survey on the current management of gastroschisis and
ascertain the degree of variability between centers.
Methods A 10-question survey was administered at the 2011 European Paediatric Surgeons' Association
(EUPSA) Congress. Questionnaires were completed by 205 delegates from 39 countries.
A total of 21 responses (10%) were incomplete and voided. The remaining 184 were divided
on the basis of following region of practice: Western Europe (WE, n = 102), Eastern Europe (EE, n = 59), and non-European countries (n = 23). Differences between WE and EE were analyzed using contingency tests. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results A total of 15% WE and 2% EE responders work in centers where antenatal magnetic resonance
imaging scans are routinely used. Nonplanned delivery is the most popular approach
(WE 46%, EE 58%). Primary closure is the preferred choice (WE 92%, EE 86%), and it
is achieved by operative fascial closure in the majority (WE 80%, EE 75%) rather than
by Bianchi technique (WE 20%, EE 25%). Staged reduction and closure is less popular
(WE 8%, EE 14%), and it is achieved by custom-made silo (WE 25%, EE 12.5%), preformed
silo (PFS) followed by surgical closure (WE 63%, EE 75%), or PFS followed by sutureless
closure (WE 12%, EE 12.5%). Objection to PFS in WE is mainly related to surgeons'
lack of confidence in the technique (40%), whereas in EE it is due to unavailability
and high cost (62%, p = 0.01). In case of associated intestinal atresia, immediate resection and anastomosis
is preferred by 60% of WE surgeons versus 35% of EE surgeons (p = 0.03), who equally favor primary closure and delayed surgery (33%). Nutrition is
preferably delivered by peripheral long line in WE (64%) and by central line inserted
in the first week of life in EE (62%, p = 0.003).
Conclusions Primary fascial closure is currently the preferred method of gastroschisis closure
across Europe. Aspects of care such as strategy for intestinal atresia and delivery
of parenteral nutrition differ significantly between WE and EE. Economic considerations
appear to influence management strategy particularly in EE. A Europe-wide audit appears
warranted to identify whether this survey reflects actual practice.
Keywords
abdominal wall defect - preformed silo - intestinal atresia - Bianchi
