Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2012; 16(04): 163-169
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327027
Schwerpunkt Wirkmechanismen der WS-Manipulation
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Spinale Manipulation funktioniert – nur wie?

Timothy W Flynn
1   Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions, 561 East 1860 South, Provo, UT 84606
,
Shane Koppenhaver
,
Joshua Cleland
,
Jeff Hebert
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 September 2012 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

PARADIGMENWECHSEL:

Die aktuelle Evidenz zeigt, rein mechanische Modelle werden der spinalen Manipulation nicht gerecht. Umfassendere Modelle scheinen schlüssiger zu sein. Wie können sich Ausbildung und Praxis an das neue Paradigma anpassen?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Abbott J, Mercer S. Lumbar segmental hypomobility: criterion-related validity of clinical examination items (a pilot study). New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy 2003; 31 (1) 3-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Balagué F, Mannion AF, Pellisé F et al. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2012; 379 (9814) 482-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Beffa R, Mathews R. Does the adjustment cavitate the targeted joint? An investigation into the location of cavitation sounds. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 2004; 27 (2) 5p-5p
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bialosky J, Bishop M, Price D et al. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther 2009; 14 (5) 531-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bialosky J, George S, Bishop M et al. How spinal manipulative therapy works: why ask why?. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2008; 38 (6) 293-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bialosky J, Simon C, Bishop M et al. Basis for spinal manipulative therapy: A physical therapist perspective. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2011; DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.11.014.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bolton PS, Budgell BS. Spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization influence different axial sensory beds. Medical Hypotheses 2006; 66 (2) 258-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans R et al. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with spinal manipulation and mobilization. The Spine Journal: Official Journal Of The North American Spine Society 2008; 8 (1) 213-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL et al. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. The Spine Journal: Official Journal Of The North American Spine Society 2004; 4 (3) 335-356
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM et al. Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. The Journal Of Orthopaedic And Sports Physical Therapy 2008; 38 (9) A1-A34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW et al. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Annals Of Internal Medicine 2004; 141 (12) 920-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chiradejnant A, Latimer J, Maher C et al. Does the choice of spinal level treated during posteroanterior (PA) mobilisation affect treatment outcome?. Physiotherapy Theory & Practice 2002; 18 (4) 165-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Chiradejnant A, Maher C, Latimer J et al. Efficacy of “therapist-selected” versus “randomly selected” mobilisation techniques for the treatment of low back pain: a randomised controlled trial.. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2003; 49 (4) 233-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Annals Of Internal Medicine 2007; 147 (7) 478-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cleland JA, Glynn P, Whitman JM et al. Short-Term Effects of Thrust Versus Nonthrust Mobilization/Manipulation Directed at the Thoracic Spine in Patients With Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Physical Therapy 2007; 87 (4) 431-440 DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060217.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cleland J, Flynn T, Childs J et al. The audible pop from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and its relation to short-term outcomes in patients with neck pain. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2007; 15 (3) 143-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cleland J, Fritz J, Kulig J et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2009; 34 (25) 2720-2729 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b48809.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Coronado R, Gay C, Bialosky J et al. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2012; DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.12.013.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cramer GD, Gregerson DM, Knudsen JT et al. The effects of side-posture positioning and spinal adjusting on the lumbar Z joints: a randomized controlled trial with sixty-four subjects. Spine 2002; 27 (22) 2459-2466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dagenais S, Tricco AC, Haldeman S et al. Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines. The Spine Journal: Official Journal Of The North American Spine Society 2010; 10 (6) 514-529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Degenhardt B, Darmani N, Johnson J et al. Role of osteopathic manipulative treatment in altering pain biomarkers: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2007; 107 (9) 387-400
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Delitto A, Erhard RE, Bowling RW et al. A treatment-based classification approach to low back syndrome: identifying and staging patients for conservative treatment. Physical therapy 1995; 75 (6) 470-85
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 DeVocht JW, Pickar JG, Wilder DG et al. pinal manipulation alters electromyographic activity of paraspinal muscles: a descriptive study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005; 28 (7) 465-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dreyfuss P, Michaelsen M, Pauza K et al. The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. Spine 1996; 21 (22) 2594-2602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dunning JR, Cleland CA, Waldrop MA et al. Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. The Journal Of Orthopaedic And Sports Physical Therapy 2012; 42 (1) 5-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dunning J, Rushton A. The effects of cervical high-velocity low-amplitude thrust manipulation on resting electromyographic activity of the biceps brachii muscle. Manual Therapy 2009; 14 (5) 508-513
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Downey C, Miangolarra-Page JC et al. Immediate changes in radiographically determined lateral flexion range of motion following a single cervical HVLA manipulation in patients presenting with mechanical neck pain: A case series. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 2005; 8: 139-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C, Palomeque-del-Cerro L, Rodríguez-Blanco C et al. Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: A case series. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2007; 30 (4) 312-320
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Feuerstein M, Marcus SC, Huang GD et al. National trends in nonoperative care for nonspecific back pain. The Spine Journal: Official Journal Of The North American Spine Society 2004; 4 (1) 56-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J et al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 2002; 27 (24) 2835-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Flynn TW, Childs J, Childs J et al. The audible pop from high-velocity thrust manipulation and outcome in individuals with low back pain. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 2006; 29 (1) 40-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Flynn T, Fritz J, Wainner R et al. The audible pop is not necessary for successful spinal high-velocity thrust manipulation in individuals with low back pain. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2003; 84 (7) 1057-1060
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Fritz J, Koppenhaver S, Kawchuk G et al. Preliminary Investigation of the Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Manipulation: Exploration of a Multivariate Model Including Spinal Stiffness, Multifidus Recruitment, and Clinical Findings. Spine 2011; (Phila Pa 1976) 36 (21) 1772-1781 DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216337d.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gal J, Herzog W, Kawchuk G et al. Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1997; a 20 (1) 30-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gal J, Herzog W, Kawchuk G et al. Measurements of vertebral translations using bone pins, surface markers and accelerometers. Clin Biomech 1997; b (Bristol, Avon) 12 (5) 337-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gal JM, Herzog W, Kawchuk GN et al. Forces and relative vertebral movements during SMT to unembalmed post-rigor human cadavers: peculiarities associated with joint cavitation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995; 18 (1) 4-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Haas M. Efficacy of Cervical Endplay Assessment as an Indicator for Spinal Manipulation. Spine 2003; 28 (11) 1091-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Haavik-Taylor H, Murphy B. Cervical spine manipulation alters sensorimotor integration: a somatosensory evoked potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118 (2) 391-402 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.014.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hancock MJ, Maher CG, Latimer J et al. Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomised controlled trial. European Spine Journal: Official Publication Of The European Spine Society, The European Spinal Deformity Society, And The European Section Of The Cervical Spine Research Society 2008; 17 (7) 936-936
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Harvey N, Cooper C. Physiotherapy for neck and back pain. BMJ 2005; (Clinical Research Ed.) 330 (7482) 53-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hebert JJ, Koppenhaver SL, Walker BF. Subgrouping Patients With Low Back Pain: A Treatment-Based Approach to Classification. Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach 2011; DOI: 10.1177/1941738111415044.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Herzog W, Scheele D, Conway PJ. Electromyographic responses of back and limb muscles associated with spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 1999; 24 (2) 146-52 discussion 153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ianuzzi A, Khalsa PS. High loading rate during spinal manipulation produces unique facet joint capsule strain patterns compared with axial rotations. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005; 28 (9) 673-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Jull G, Moore A. Are manipulative therapy approaches the same?. Manual Therapy 2002; 7 (2) 63-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R et al. The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Archives Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation 2009; 90 (2) 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R et al. Immediate effects of the central posteroanterior mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain. Disability & Rehabilitation 2010; 32 (8) 622-628 DOI: 10.3109/09638280903204716.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Keating JC, Bergmann TF, Jacobs GE et al. Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality. Journal Of Manipulative And Physiological Therapeutics 1990; 13 (8) 463-470
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Keller TS, Colloca CJ. Mechanical force spinal manipulation incr. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000; 23 (9) 585-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Koppenhaver S, Fritz J, Hebert J et al. Association between changes in abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and clinical improvement after spinal manipulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011; 41 (6) 389-99 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3632.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Kulig K, Landel R, Powers C et al. Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2004; 34 (3) 57-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Lafont O. From the willow to aspirin. Revue D’histoire De La Pharmacie 2007; 55 (354) 209-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Lawrence DJ, Meeker W, Branson R et al. Chiropractic management of low back pain and low back-related leg complaints: a literature synthesis. Journal Of Manipulative And Physiological Therapeutics 2008; 31 (9) 659-674
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lee RYW, McGregor AH, Bull AMJ et al. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation. Clinical Biomechanics 2005; (Bristol, Avon) 20 (2) 228-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Lehman GJ, McGill SM. Spinal manipulation causes variable spine kinematic and trunk muscle electromyographic responses. Clin Biomech 2001; (Bristol, Avon) 16 (4) 293-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Lehman GJ, Vernon H, McGill SM. Effects of a mechanical pain stimulus on erector spinae activity before and after a spinal manipulation in patients with back pain: a preliminary investigation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001; 24 (6) 402-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Love RM, Brodeur RR. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of motion palpation for the thoracolumbar spine. Journal Of Manipulative And Physiological Therapeutics 1987; 10 (1) 1-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Machado LAC, Kamper SJ, Herbert RD et al. Analgesic effects of treatments for non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Rheumatology 2009; 48 (5) 520-520
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Maigne JY, Guillon F. Highlighting of interverebral movements and variations of intradiskal pressure during lumbar spine manipulation: a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000; 23: 531-535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Maitland G. Maitland’s Vertebral Manipulation. 6th ed.. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Martínez-Segura R, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Ruiz-Sáez M et al. Immediate effects on neck pain and active range of motion after a single cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2006; 29 (7) 511-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Meijne W, van Neerbos K, Aufdemkampe G. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet Test. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 1999; 22 (1) 4-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Mootz RD, Keating JC, Kontz HP et al. Intra- and interobserver reliability of passive motion palpation of the lumbar spine. Journal Of Manipulative And Physiological Therapeutics 1989; 12 (6) 440-445
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Nilsson N, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J. Lasting changes in passive range motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind controlled trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1996; 19 (3) 165-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 O’Haire C, Gibbons P. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Manual Therapy 2000; 5 (1) 13-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Pettman E. A History of Manipulative Therapy. The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 15 (3) 165-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Puentedura EJ, Landers MR, Cleland JA et al. Thoracic spine thrust manipulation versus cervical spine thrust manipulation in patients with acute neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2011; 41 (4) 208-220 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3640.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Raney NH, Teyhen DS, Childs JD. Observed changes in lateral abdominal muscle thickness after spinal manipulation: a case series using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007; 37 (8) 472-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Ross J, Bereznick D, McGill S et al. Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?. Spine 2004; 29 (13) 1452-1457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Rubinstein SM, van Middelkoop M, Assendelft WJ et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews (Online) 2011; (2) CD008112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Schmid A, Brunner F, Wright A et al. Paradigm shift in manual therapy? Evidence for a central nervous system component in the response to passive cervical joint mobilisation. Man Ther 2008; 13 (5) 387-96 DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.12.007.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Schneider M, Erhard R, Brach J et al. Spinal palpation for lumbar segmental mobility and pain provocation: an interexaminer reliability study. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 2008; 31 (6) 465-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A. Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Man Ther 2001; 6 (2) 72-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Suter E, McMorland G. Decrease in elbow flexor inhibition after cervical spine manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain. Clin Biomech 2002; (Bristol, Avon) 17 (7) 541-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Suter E, McMorland G, Herzog W et al. Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint manipulation in patients with anterior knee pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999; 22 (3) 149-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Sutlive TG, Mabry LM, Easterling EJ et al. Comparison of short-term response to two spinal manipulation techniques for patients with low back pain in a military beneficiary population. Military Medicine 2009; 174 (7) 750-756
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Taylor HH, Murphy B. The effects of spinal manipulation on central integration of dual somatosensory input observed after motor training: a crossover study. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2010; a 33 (4) 261-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Taylor HH, Murphy B. Altered central integration of dual somatosensory input after cervical spine manipulation. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics 2010; b 33 (3) 178-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, Injeyan HS, Ruegg R. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29 (1) 14-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Tullberg T, Blomberg S, Branth B et al. Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine 1998; 23 (10) 1124-8 discussion 1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 van Schalkwyk R, Parkin-Smith G. A clinical trial investigating the possible effect of the supine cervical rotatory manipulation and the supine lateral break manipulation in the treatment of mechanical neck pain: a pilot study. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 2000; 23 (5) 324-331
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 van Tulder MW, Koes B, Malmivaara A. Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review. European Spine Journal: Official Publication Of The European Spine Society, The European Spinal Deformity Society, And The European Section Of The Cervical Spine Research Society 2006; 15 (1) S64-S81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Whittingham W, Nilsson N. Active range of motion in the cervical spine increases after spinal manipulation (toggle recoil). J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001; 24 (9) 552-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar