Somatic Stem Cells in the Myometrium and in Myomas

Tetsuo Maruyama; Masanori Ono; Yasunori Yoshimura

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1331801

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Table of Contents

Semin Reprod Med 2013; 31(01): 077-081
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331801

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Somatic Stem Cells in the Myometrium and in Myomas

Authors

Tetsuo Maruyama

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Masanori Ono

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Yasunori Yoshimura

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

The human uterus mainly consists of two layers: an inner endometrium and an outer layer, the myometrium, made of smooth muscle. The uterus is characterized by its unique capacity for regeneration. This capacity permits cyclical regeneration and remodeling of the tissue over the course of a woman's reproductive life. During each menstrual cycle, the endometrium regenerates, and the uterus enlarges to make room for fetal growth. This cyclic physiologic pattern suggests that myometrial stem/progenitor cells are present in the tissue and play a role in myometrial functions. Our group (and others) recently characterized and isolated putative stem/progenitor cells in the myometrium. These findings are permitting a better understanding of myometrial physiology and pathology. We review current studies of myometrial stem/progenitor cells and suggestions that, in combination with hypoxia, these cells may contribute to uterine remodeling during pregnancy and the formation of myomas.

Keywords

somatic stem cells - myomas (fibroids) - hypoxia - pregnancy - myometrium

Full Text

References

References
1 Maruyama T, Masuda H, Ono M, Kajitani T, Yoshimura Y. Human uterine stem/progenitor cells: their possible role in uterine physiology and pathology. Reproduction 2010; 140 (1) 11-22
2 Maruyama T. Stem/progenitor cells and the regeneration potentials in the human uterus. Reprod Med Biol 2010; 9: 9-16
3 Ono M, Maruyama T, Masuda H , et al. Side population in human uterine myometrium displays phenotypic and functional characteristics of myometrial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104 (47) 18700-18705
4 Shynlova O, Tsui P, Jaffer S, Lye SJ. Integration of endocrine and mechanical signals in the regulation of myometrial functions during pregnancy and labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144 (Suppl. 01) S2-S10
5 Ramsey EM. Anatomy of the human uterus. In: Chard T, Grudzinskas JG, , eds. The Uterus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1994: 18-40
6 Shynlova O, Oldenhof A, Dorogin A , et al. Myometrial apoptosis: activation of the caspase cascade in the pregnant rat myometrium at midgestation. Biol Reprod 2006; 74 (5) 839-849
7 Golebiewska A, Brons NH, Bjerkvig R, Niclou SP. Critical appraisal of the side population assay in stem cell and cancer stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 2011; 8 (2) 136-147
8 Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, Conner AS, Mulligan RC. Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med 1996; 183 (4) 1797-1806
9 Ono M, Kajitani T, Uchida H , et al. OCT4 expression in human uterine myometrial stem/progenitor cells. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (8) 2059-2067
10 Mohyeldin A, Garzón-Muvdi T, Quiñones-Hinojosa A. Oxygen in stem cell biology: a critical component of the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 7 (2) 150-161
11 Shynlova O, Dorogin A, Lye SJ. Stretch-induced uterine myocyte differentiation during rat pregnancy: involvement of caspase activation. Biol Reprod 2010; 82 (6) 1248-1255
12 Gargett CE. Uterine stem cells: what is the evidence?. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13 (1) 87-101
13 Konishi I, Fujii S, Okamura H, Mori T. Development of smooth muscle in the human fetal uterus: an ultrastructural study. J Anat 1984; 139 (Pt 2) 239-252
14 He Q, Wan C, Li G. Concise review: multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in blood. Stem Cells 2007; 25 (1) 69-77
15 Deans RJ, Moseley AB. Mesenchymal stem cells: biology and potential clinical uses. Exp Hematol 2000; 28 (8) 875-884
16 Wakitani S, Saito T, Caplan AI. Myogenic cells derived from rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells exposed to 5-azacytidine. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18 (12) 1417-1426
17 Gang EJ, Jeong JA, Hong SH , et al. Skeletal myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells 2004; 22 (4) 617-624
18 Arango NA, Szotek PP, Manganaro TF, Oliva E, Donahoe PK, Teixeira J. Conditional deletion of beta-catenin in the mesenchyme of the developing mouse uterus results in a switch to adipogenesis in the myometrium. Dev Biol 2005; 288 (1) 276-283
19 Chan RW, Gargett CE. Identification of label-retaining cells in mouse endometrium. Stem Cells 2006; 24 (6) 1529-1538
20 Szotek PP, Chang HL, Zhang L , et al. Adult mouse myometrial label-retaining cells divide in response to gonadotropin stimulation. Stem Cells 2007; 25 (5) 1317-1325
21 Tanwar PS, Lee HJ, Zhang L , et al. Constitutive activation of Beta-catenin in uterine stroma and smooth muscle leads to the development of mesenchymal tumors in mice. Biol Reprod 2009; 81 (3) 545-552
22 Teixeira J, Rueda BR, Pru JK. Uterine stem cells. In Stembook; Cambridge, MA: Harvard Stem Cell Institute. Available at www.stembrook.org Accessed 2008
23 Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 1975; 255 (5505) 197-200
24 Lennartsson J, Rönnstrand L. The stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit as a drug target in cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2006; 6 (1) 65-75
25 Okolo S. Incidence, aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 22 (4) 571-588
26 Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (5) 1041-1048
27 Walker CL, Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids: the elephant in the room. Science 2005; 308 (5728) 1589-1592
28 Townsend DE, Sparkes RS, Baluda MC, McClelland G. Unicellular histogenesis of uterine leiomyomas as determined by electrophoresis by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 107 (8) 1168-1173
29 Lobel MK, Somasundaram P, Morton CC. The genetic heterogeneity of uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2006; 33 (1) 13-39
30 Fujii S, Konishi I, Horiuchi A, Orii A, Nikaido T. Mesenchymal Cell Differentiation: Speculation about the Histogenesis of Uterine Leiomyomas. New York, NY: Parthenon; 1999: 3-15
31 Pavlovich CP, Schmidt LS. Searching for the hereditary causes of renal-cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4 (5) 381-393
32 Fukuhara K, Kariya M, Kita M , et al. Secreted frizzled related protein 1 is overexpressed in uterine leiomyomas, associated with a high estrogenic environment and unrelated to proliferative activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87 (4) 1729-1736
33 Mayer A, Hoeckel M, von Wallbrunn A, Horn LC, Wree A, Vaupel P. HIF-mediated hypoxic response is missing in severely hypoxic uterine leiomyomas. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 662: 399-405
34 Mäkinen N, Mehine M, Tolvanen J , et al. MED12, the mediator complex subunit 12 gene, is mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas. Science 2011; 334 (6053) 252-255
35 Flake GP, Andersen J, Dixon D. Etiology and pathogenesis of uterine leiomyomas: a review. Environ Health Perspect 2003; 111 (8) 1037-1054
36 Wang X, Kumar D, Seidman JD. Uterine lipoleiomyomas: a clinicopathologic study of 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2006; 25 (3) 239-242
37 Bhattacharya N, Banerjee AK, Sengupta J. Ossification of leiomyoma. J Indian Med Assoc 1998; 96 (3) 99
38 Chang HL, Senaratne TN, Zhang L , et al. Uterine leiomyomas exhibit fewer stem/progenitor cell characteristics when compared with corresponding normal myometrium. Reprod Sci 2010; 17 (2) 158-167
39 Ono M, Qiang W, Serna VA , et al. Role of stem cells in human uterine leiomyoma growth. PLoS ONE 2012; 7 (5) e36935
40 Mas A, Cervello I, Gil-Sanchis C , et al. Identification and characterization of the human leiomyoma side population as putative tumor-initiating cells. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (3) 741-751