J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75(02): 098-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1342934
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

No Significant Displacement of Basal Brain Structures upon Head Movement: Kinematic MRI Morphometry Relevant to Neuroendoscopy

Avril Horsburgh
1   Section of Neuroradiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Ramez W. Kirollos
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Tarik F. Massoud
1   Section of Neuroradiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
3   Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 July 2012

20 December 2012

Publication Date:
24 June 2013 (online)

Abstract

Background An appreciation of normal intracranial anatomy allows optimal planning of trajectories necessary for safe and effective neuroendoscopy. Little information exists on displacement of the caudal brain relative to the skull upon head movement; this could have important implications for planning and performance of neuroendoscopic procedures. We used kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies to examine the morphometric displacement and changing anatomical relationships between the clivus and basal brain structures, intracranial vessels, and subarachnoid spaces.

Patients We retrospectively analyzed 15 patients undergoing sagittal T2 kinematic MRI of the head and neck in modest flexion and extension. The angle between a horizontal axial reference plane and a line between the opisthion and the hard palate defined the degree of flexion and extension. We then measured in flexion and extension (1) the cervicomedullary angle (CMA), (2) displacement of the ventral surface of the brainstem (i.e., depth of the prepontine and premedullary cisterns), (3) total sagittal area of the combined suprasellar and ventral brainstem cisterns, and (4) the basilar tip to tuber cinereum distance.

Results Relative to neutral head position, a mean extension angle of −15.8 degrees was achieved in all 15 patients, and a mean flexion angle of +9.9 degrees was achieved in 6 patients. The mean CMA was 146 degrees in flexion and 158 degrees in extension. The mean reduction in prepontine and premedullary cistern depth was 0.7 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively, upon flexion from extension. The combined area of suprasellar and ventral brainstem cisterns was minimally reduced from 402 mm2 in flexion to 399 mm2 in extension. The basilar tip did not move significantly from its position in flexion to extension, 5.3 mm to 5.2 mm respectively from the tuber cinereum.

Conclusion Kinematic MRI shows minimal brainstem-to-clivus displacement even within minor physiological changes in head flexion. Importantly, these movements are small and there is no significant shift in the position of the basilar tip in modest flexion or extension. These results should be useful for presurgical planning of optimal patient positioning during neuroendoscopic procedures such as third ventriculostomy and the expanded endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the retroclival space.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ji S, Zhu Q, Dougherty L, Margulies SS. In vivo measurements of human brain displacement. Stapp Car Crash J 2004; 48: 227-237
  • 2 Lawlor DA, Stone T. Public health and data protection: an inevitable collision or potential for a meeting of minds?. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1221-1225
  • 3 Schroter S, Plowman R, Hutchings A, Gonzalez A. Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals. J Med Ethics 2006; 32: 718-723
  • 4 Karhu JO, Parkkola RK, Koskinen SK. Evaluation of flexion/extension of the upper cervical spine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an MRI study with a dedicated positioning device compared to conventional radiographs. Acta Radiol 2005; 46: 55-66
  • 5 Reijnierse M, Breedveld FC, Kroon HM, Hansen B, Pope TL, Bloem JL. Are magnetic resonance flexion views useful in evaluating the cervical spine of patients with rheumatoid arthritis?. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29: 85-89
  • 6 Bundschuh C, Modic MT, Kearney F, Morris R, Deal C. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine: surface-coil MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151: 181-187
  • 7 Greitz D, Wirestam R, Franck A, Nordell B, Thomsen C, Ståhlberg F. Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology 1992; 34: 370-380
  • 8 Feinberg DA, Mark AS. Human brain motion and cerebrospinal fluid circulation demonstrated with MR velocity imaging. Radiology 1987; 163: 793-799
  • 9 Zhu DC, Xenos M, Linninger AA, Penn RD. Dynamics of lateral ventricle and cerebrospinal fluid in normal and hydrocephalic brains. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 756-770
  • 10 Enzmann DR, Pelc NJ. Brain motion: measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185: 653-660
  • 11 Poncelet BP, Wedeen VJ, Weisskoff RM, Cohen MS. Brain parenchyma motion: measurement with cine echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185: 645-651
  • 12 Pudenz RH, Shelden CH. The lucite calvarium; a method for direct observation of the brain; cranial trauma and brain movement. J Neurosurg 1946; 3: 487-505
  • 13 Couper Z, Albermani F. Infant brain subjected to oscillatory loading: material differentiation, properties, and interface conditions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2008; 7: 105-125
  • 14 Belingardi G, Chiandussi G, Gaviglio I. Development and validation of a new finite element model of human head. Available at: http://www.biomedcafeonline.com/documents/aow9.pdf . Accessed June 25, 2012
  • 15 Anastasian ZH, Ramnath B, Komotar RJ , et al. Evoked potential monitoring identifies possible neurological injury during positioning for craniotomy. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 817-821
  • 16 Fabiano AJ, Leonardo J, Grand W. Posterior cerebral artery P1 segment at the stoma during endoscopic third ventriculostomy in adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81: 374-378
  • 17 Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19: E4
  • 18 Prevedello DM, Ditzel Filho LF, Solari D, Carrau RL, Kassam AB. Expanded endonasal approaches to middle cranial fossa and posterior fossa tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2010; 21: 621-635 , vi
  • 19 Kassam AB, Mintz AH, Gardner PA, Horowitz MB, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1) (Suppl. 01) E162-E165 , discussion E162–E165
  • 20 Jho HD, Ha HG. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: Part 3—The clivus and posterior fossa. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47: 16-23
  • 21 Holzmann D, Reisch R, Krayenbühl N, Hug E, Bernays RL. The transnasal transclival approach for clivus chordoma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010; 53: 211-217
  • 22 Reinges MH, Krings T, Nguyen HH , et al. Is the head position during preoperative image data acquisition essential for the accuracy of navigated brain tumor surgery?. Comput Aided Surg 2000; 5: 426-432