Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343720
Assessment of skinfold thickness equations in estimating body composition in children with inflammatory bowel
Introduction: Growth is a central process in paediatrics. Weight and height evaluation are therefore routine exams for every child but in some situation, particularly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), a wider evaluation of nutritional status needs to be performed. The assessment of body composition is essential in order to maintain acceptable growth using the following techniques: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), bio-impedance-analysis (BIA) and anthropometric measurements (skinfold thickness skin), the latter being most easily available and most cost effective.
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of skinfold equations in estimating percentage body fat (%BF) in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), compared with assessment of body fat dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
Methods: Twenty-one patients (11 females, 10 males; mean age: 14.3 years, range 12 – 16 years) with IBD (Crohn's disease n = 15, ulcerative colitis n = 6)). Estimated%BF was computed using 6 established equations based on the triceps, biceps, subscapular and suprailiac skinfolds (Deurenberg, Weststrate, Slaughter, Durnin & Rahaman, Johnston, Brook) and compared to DEXA. Concordance analysis was performed using Lin's concordance correlation and the Bland-Altman limits of agreement method.
Results: Durnin & Rahaman's equation shows a higher Lin's concordance coefficient with a small difference amongst raw values for skinfolds and DEXA compared to the other equations. Correlation coefficient between mean and difference is close to zero with a non-significant Bradley-Blackwood test.
§ between difference and mean. CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation of the difference. ***, p < 0.001 |
||||||||
Spearman |
Lin's concordance |
Bland-Altman limits of agreement |
Bradley-Blackwood |
|||||
correlation |
Coefficient |
95% CI |
Difference |
SD |
Correlation § |
Test |
P-value |
|
Deurenberg |
0.852 *** |
0.702 |
0.512 – 0.891 |
–3.6 |
4.2 |
–0.343 |
9.84 |
< 0.001 |
Weststrate |
0.898 *** |
0.850 |
0.734 – 0.966 |
2.5 |
3.3 |
0.003 |
5.62 |
< 0.05 |
Slaughter |
0.906 *** |
0.848 |
0.744 – 0.952 |
0.003 |
4.9 |
0.570 |
4.57 |
< 0.05 |
Durnin & Rahaman |
0.915 *** |
0.871 |
0.764 – 0.979 |
–1.0 |
3.6 |
–0.033 |
0.80 |
0.46 |
Johnson |
0.919 *** |
0.810 |
0.676 – 0.945 |
–3.4 |
3.3 |
–0.040 |
10.5 |
< 0.001 |
Brook |
0.900 *** |
0.876 |
0.779 – 0.972 |
1.8 |
3.6 |
0.355 |
4.18 |
< 0.05 |
Conclusion: Body composition in paediatric IBD patients using the Durnin & Rahaman skinfold-equation adequately reflects values obtained by DEXA.
Disclosure of Interest: None Declared