Reliability of Venous Couplers for Microanastomosis of the Venae Comitantes in Free Radial Forearm Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction

Abstract

The radial forearm free flap has gained popularity in head and neck reconstruction after oncologic resection because of its versatility. This popularity has only intensified with the advances in technique and instrumentation. Although debated in the past, the success of using the deep venae comitantes system for flap drainage is well documented. Although the use of couplers in a variety of flap anastomoses has been described in the literature, to our knowledge this is the first series presented on the use of couplers in small, deep system venae comitantes. We retrospectively examined our experience in 61 patients who underwent radial forearm free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Of the 61 patients, 22 anastomoses were hand sewn, and 39 anastomoses were performed using venous couplers. No flap losses occurred in the group in whom venous couplers were used. In addition, no intraoperative thromboses, arterial or venous, were noted with coupler use. Our series demonstrates that the venous coupler is a safe and effective alternative to the hand-sewn anastomosis of the radial forearm free flap venous comitantes in head and neck reconstruction.

Keywords

microvascular coupler - radial forearm flap - venae comitantes

• References

• 1 Yang GF, Chen PJ, Gao YZ , et al. Forearm free skin flap transplantation: a report of 56 cases. 1981. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50 (3) 162-165
• 2 Futran ND, Gal TJ, Farwell DG. Radial forearm free flap. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2003; 15 (4) 577-591 , vi–vii
• 3 Evans GRD, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS , et al. The radial forearm free flap for head and neck reconstruction: a review. Am J Surg 1994; 168 (5) 446-450
• 4 Médard de Chardon V, Balaguer T, Chignon-Sicard B , et al. The radial forearm free flap: a review of microsurgical options. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (1) 5-10
• 5 Timmons MJ. The vascular basis of the radial forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (1) 80-92
• 6 Futran ND, Stack Jr BC. Single versus dual venous drainage of the radial forearm free flap. Am J Otolaryngol 1996; 17 (2) 112-117
• 7 Ichinose A, Tahara S, Terashi H , et al. Importance of the deep vein in the drainage of a radial forearm flap: a haemodynamic study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2003; 37 (3) 145-149
• 8 Selber JC, Sanders E, Lin H, Yu P. Venous drainage of the radial forearm flap: comparison of the deep and superficial systems. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (4) 347-350
• 9 Demirkan F, Wei FC, Lutz BS, Cher TS, Chen IH. Reliability of the venae comitantes in venous drainage of the free radial forearm flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (5) 1544-1548
• 10 Chernichenko N, Ross DA, Shin J, Sasaki CT, Ariyan S. End-to-side venous anastomosis with an anastomotic coupling device for microvascular free-tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (12) 2146-2150
• 11 Zhang T, Lubek J, Salama A , et al. Venous anastomoses using microvascular coupler in free flap head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70 (4) 992-996
• 12 Spector JA, Draper LB, Levine JP, Ahn CY. Routine use of microvascular coupling device for arterial anastomosis in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56 (4) 365-368
• 13 Ross DA, Chow JY, Shin J , et al. Arterial coupling for microvascular free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 131 (10) 891-895
• 14 Denk MJ, Longaker MT, Basner AL, Glat PM, Karp NS, Kasabian AK. Microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremity using the 3M microvascular coupling device in venous anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 35 (6) 601-606
• 15 Ahn CY, Shaw WW, Berns S, Markowitz BL. Clinical experience with the 3M microvascular coupling anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (7) 1481-1484
• 16 Yap LH, Constantinides J, Butler CE. Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (6) 666-669